Author: Zhang Feng
Real World Assets (RWA) are accelerating their entry into the DeFi space, bringing liquidity transformation to traditional finance. However, in practice, the anonymity of DeFi conflicts with the strong regulations of traditional finance (especially KYC/AML). Achieving compliance is not a simple transplant; it requires innovative architecture and technological integration.
The integration of RWA and DeFi is not merely a "connection," but rather gives rise to a new type of financial infrastructure. Successful KYC/AML compliance solutions must be hybrid architectures: off-chain identity verification and legal entities as the foundation, while on-chain, efficient and privacy-friendly verification and execution are achieved through ZKP, DID, and programmable compliance. Regulatory agencies need to embrace innovation and clarify adaptive rules under the principle of "same risk, same regulation." Technology developers should view compliance as a core design goal rather than an afterthought.
1. Decoupling Identity and Transaction with Layered Architecture
Layout from both blockchain identity and contract access perspectives.
Off-Chain/On-Chain Hybrid Identity. Users complete strict KYC/AML verification through off-chain professional KYC providers such as Circle (USDC issuer), Fractal ID, and Parallel Markets. Biometric verification, document verification, and risk database screening are all conducted in a secure off-chain environment. At the same time, based on on-chain verifiable credentials, zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) credentials (such as Polygon ID) or soulbound tokens (SBT) are generated to prove that the user "has passed KYC" or "is not on the sanctions list," without exposing specific identity information. The credentials are bound to the user's wallet address.
Compliance Access Layer (Gated Access / Permissioned Pools). Specific RWA funding pools of DeFi protocols (such as Centrifuge and Goldfinch) set access control rules based on credentials. Users must provide valid credentials to participate (deposit, borrow, trade specific RWA assets). When the KYC status expires or is revoked, the credentials automatically become invalid, triggering pre-set dynamic credential management rules within the protocol (such as prohibiting new investments or initiating exit processes).
2. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring and Automated AML Screening Challenges
In terms of dynamic regulation, multiple measures are taken through off-chain data integration, on-chain transaction behavior monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting.
On-Chain Transaction Monitoring. Tools like Chainalysis and Elliptic can analyze wallet transaction histories and associated addresses (such as interactions with the dark web or mixers), generating risk scores for addresses. Additionally, build anomaly detection to monitor large, frequent, and unusually sourced/directed transactions (such as suddenly transferring a large amount of funds to immediately invest in RWA).
Off-Chain AML Database Integration. Integrate real-time screening APIs from providers like ComplyAdvantage and LexisNexis. The key challenge is to associate wallet addresses with off-chain identities (relying on the aforementioned credential system) for the screening to have legal effect. On the other hand, how can on-chain smart contracts securely and reliably obtain updates to off-chain AML lists? Specific solutions need to be developed within decentralized oracle networks (such as Chainlink).
Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) On-Chain-Off-Chain Interaction. When protocols or monitoring services detect high-risk transactions, they need to report encrypted transaction data + associated identity information to regulatory agencies/compliance teams through compliance interfaces. The key challenge is that the reporting process, responsible parties, and data formats need to be standardized.
3. Clarifying Responsible Parties and Basic Mechanisms for Dispute Resolution
Mainly addressing responsibility and dispute resolution mechanisms.
Clarifying Compliance Obligations (The Gatekeeper Problem). For special purpose vehicles (SPV) / legal entities, RWA initiators (such as real estate companies, bond issuers) or core developers of protocols establish regulated entities (such as Centrifuge's registered entity in the U.S.) to act as legal responsible parties for KYC/AML compliance. For permissioned DeFi protocols, the protocol itself needs to be designed to require permission for joining (nodes and liquidity providers must undergo KYC), as seen in some enterprise-level blockchain solutions (such as Fnality). Additionally, third-party compliance service providers, such as licensed institutions (like trust companies, payment institutions), are needed to handle user due diligence and transaction monitoring.
Jurisdiction and Legal Applicability. Real estate RWAs are primarily governed by the laws of their physical location, i.e., the law of the asset's location. In some scenarios, the law of the user's location applies, requiring compliance with the financial regulations of the user's residence/nationality (such as U.S. FATCA, EU AMLD). At the same time, protocols are required to have transparent designs that clearly announce the applicable laws, regulatory agencies, and user rights.
4. Combining Technology and Law to Solve the Balance of Privacy and Efficiency
Integrating privacy computing technology, decentralized identity technology, and recognized regulatory technology with smart contracts.
Deep Application of Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP). KYC credentials can prove that user information is valid and not on a blacklist without disclosing specific content. It can also conduct AML screening, where users run screening software locally to generate ZKP proof that "my counterparty is not on the latest blacklist," without exposing the counterparty's address to the protocol/counterparty. Additionally, it can generate transaction compliance proofs, where complex transactions can generate ZKP proof that they comply with all preset rules (such as single investor limits).
Decentralized Identity (DID) and Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users have complete control over their identity data (stored in personal digital wallets) and can selectively disclose specific information to specific parties when needed (such as only disclosing "annual income > $100,000" proof to the RWA pool). This enhances interoperability and reduces redundant KYC.
Combining RegTech with Smart Contracts. Programmable compliance, such as directly encoding AML rules, investment limits, lock-up periods, etc., into smart contracts for automatic execution. Providing regulatory agencies with "read-only" API regulatory sandbox interfaces to monitor overall risk without needing to view the privacy details of each transaction.
5. Moving Forward Amid Ongoing Challenges and Solutions
The eternal tension between privacy and compliance, that is, how to meet regulatory real-name requirements while maximizing the protection of user financial privacy. ZKP/DID is the direction, but large-scale application requires more mature practices.
Cross-jurisdictional coordination is also a major challenge. There is a lack of a unified regulatory framework for crypto assets/DeFi globally, and RWA protocols face fragmented compliance requirements.
Ambiguity in Responsibility Definition. How to allocate responsibility among developers, nodes, users, and SPVs when smart contract vulnerabilities lead to violations? The law urgently needs to catch up. Agreements can be made in advance during model design.
Trust and Security of Oracles. The on-chain transfer of critical off-chain data (AML lists, asset prices) must be highly secure and reliable; otherwise, it becomes a single point of failure or a target for attacks.
Challenges in Sanction Enforcement. How to effectively freeze the assets of specific sanctioned addresses on a permissionless underlying blockchain? The technical implementation is extremely difficult and relies on controlling front-end/inflow and outflow channels, combining on-chain and off-chain.
Despite the significant challenges, the compliance path for RWA in DeFi is being explored in projects like Centrifuge, MakerDAO (RWA collateral), and Ondo Finance (tokenized government bonds). This is not only about legality but is also the key to unlocking trillions of dollars in liquidity for RWA—compliance is the necessary path for DeFi to go mainstream, rather than an obstacle.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
