According to multiple media reports on April 30, 2026, the cryptocurrency project WorldLibertyFi (WLFI), supported by the Trump family, recently passed a key governance proposal. The proposal focuses on the token unlocking arrangements for early supporters and the founding team, ultimately passing with an overwhelming support rate of about 99.5%. This unlocking involves a total of approximately 62 billion WLFI tokens, primarily aimed at internal stakeholders such as early supporters, the founding team, advisors, and partners. Although the voting results show a seemingly high consensus within the community, reports indicate that the current top four wallets hold approximately 40% of the voting power. This highly concentrated governance structure has raised external scrutiny regarding project governance transparency and power balance, while also reflecting a unified internal interest.

In terms of specific release logic and timeline anchor points, the proposal set a long-term locking period for internal tokens. Among them, approximately 17 billion WLFI held by early supporters will adopt a “2-year cliff + 2-year linear unlocking” scheme, totaling 4 years to complete the release; whereas approximately 45.2 billion WLFI held by the founding team, advisors, and partners will adopt a “2-year cliff + 3-year linear unlocking” arrangement, resulting in a total period of 5 years. Additionally, the proposal introduced a flexible destruction mechanism, allowing internal stakeholders to voluntarily permanently burn 10% of their holdings, while tokens that do not actively accept the new proposal will remain in a permanently locked state (retaining governance rights). Although the two-year cliff period isolates direct selling pressure in the short term, the massive amount of 62 billion tokens, combined with the top four wallets' absolute dominance over governance proposals, has become a core variable for the market to assess the future token distribution and governance risks of the project.

99.5% High Approval: How a Few Large Holders Dominated the Vote

According to AiCoin data, the governance vote on the unlocking proposal for 62 billion WLFI tokens showed an extremely high level of consensus, with a support rate of 99.5%. However, behind this seemingly overwhelming data, the distribution of voting rights reveals a highly concentrated governance ecosystem. Reports indicate that the current WLFI governance system has the top four wallet addresses collectively holding about 40% of the voting power. Under a “one token, one vote” governance structure, this distribution of tokens means that the decisions of a few core large holders are sufficient to decisively influence the outcome of any proposal, making the 9.5% very high approval rate more a reflection of the will of large holders rather than the result of broad community consensus.

This concentration of power has prompted the market to scrutinize the long-term credibility of WorldLibertyFi. The proposal stipulates that tokens that do not actively accept the new unlocking plan will remain locked but still retain the right to participate in governance, which means that even if the tokens do not enter the circulation market, their underlying governance influence remains solid. This design ensures stable direction for the protocol while planting hidden risks for governance: future proposals regarding resource allocation, protocol parameter adjustments, or further asset unlocking may be long-term dominated by a few stakeholders. For ordinary investors, distinguishing between “formal community voting” and “substantive power concentration” is crucial, as a highly concentrated governance environment often means that the protocol's risk resilience and decentralization narrative will face ongoing tests.

62 Billion Unlock Proposal: Two Different Paces for Early Supporters and the Team

According to the latest proposal passed by the WLFI community, the unlocking of the 62 billion tokens will not happen all at once but sets different exercise rhythms for internal addresses with varying attributes. Specifically, this plan categorizes internal holdings into two core paths: the first category includes about 17 billion WLFI held by early supporters, with an unlocking plan of a 2-year cliff (Cliff) plus 2 years of linear unlocking, spanning a total of 4 years; the second category covers the founding team, advisors, and partners, involving approximately 45.2 billion tokens, which can opt for a 2-year cliff combined with 3 years of linear unlocking, extending the overall exercise period to 5 years.

This “staggered” unlocking design reflects the project’s balance between rewarding core contributors and hedging against market selling pressure. According to the details of the proposal compiled by AiCoin, in order to further alleviate concerns about token dilution, the proposal also introduced a voluntary reduction mechanism: allowing the aforementioned internal stakeholders to voluntarily burn 10% of their total WLFI holdings. Additionally, for those tokens that do not actively accept the new unlocking proposal, the proposal stipulates that they will remain in a permanently locked state. It is worth noting that although these permanently locked tokens lose the possibility of liquidity realization, they still retain governance participation rights.

From the perspective of on-chain governance logic, this arrangement attempts to maintain the stability of the protocol's early token structure by restricting short-term funding outflows during the two-year “vacuum period.” However, because the tokens that did not accept the proposal can still exercise voting rights, it means that even if some internal tokens cannot enter the secondary market due to not signing the proposal, their underlying entities can still exert influence on the future direction of the protocol based on their substantial holdings. This special setting of “locking tokens but not locking power” allows WLFI to control short-term selling pressure expectations while also making the long-term distribution of governance rights more inclined towards the early core circles.

Five-Year Lock: Is Selling Pressure Delayed or Dissolved?

From a temporal perspective, the passed unlocking proposal for 62 billion WLFI tokens essentially uses a long lock-up period to gain a psychological hedge against market selling pressure. According to the proposal details, approximately 17 billion WLFI held by early supporters adopts a “2-year cliff + 2-year linear unlocking” model, which means that this portion of the tokens will not have any possibility of entering the secondary market before 2028; whereas the approximately 45.2 billion WLFI held by the founding team, advisors, and partners has a linear unlocking period that lasts for 3 years, extending the overall release period to 5 years. This system design starting with a 2-year cliff largely postpones the short-term liquidity shock that could have formed to several years later, providing a longer window for the construction of the project ecology.

To further alleviate market concerns about the massive supply release, the proposal introduces a 10% voluntary burn clause and a permanent lock mechanism, creating a "buffer zone" between nominal supply and potential circulating volume. The proposal allows internal stakeholders to voluntarily burn 10% of their holdings, and for those who do not actively accept the unlocking proposal, their tokens will be subject to permanent lock status. Although these locked tokens still retain governance participation rights, in the perspective of token economics, they have been temporarily excluded from contributing to selling pressure. This design can soothe existing holders by artificially reducing long-term circulation expectations, attempting to counteract the negative sentiment caused by the unlocking of 62 billion tokens.

It should be noted that, according to AiCoin data, specific quantitative indicators such as the current price, trading volume, or holdings distribution of WLFI have not yet been disclosed in the public materials. In the absence of price anchors and on-chain fund flow data, the market cannot infer the immediate impact of this proposal on WLFI market performance through quantitative models. The current analysis boundaries are limited to the design aspects of the token timetable and governance system, with the core logic being to decouple the concentration of governance power from the release of token liquidity through conventional market expectation management methods of “extending lock-up + linear release.” Although selling pressure is effectively dissolved on a time scale, whether this long-term lock is merely a “delay of selling pressure” depends on the support from the project's fundamentals within the next 2 to 5 years.

Trump Family Endorsement: Political Halo and Discourse Power Game

WorldLibertyFi's uniqueness lies in its inherent political narrative. Multiple media outlets explicitly describe it as a cryptocurrency project supported by the Trump family, and this powerful background endorsement not only gives the project very high visibility but also pushes its governance actions to the forefront of public opinion. The latest developments on April 30, 2026, indicate that the unlocking proposal involving 62 billion WLFI has been passed with an overwhelming support rate of approximately 99.5%. However, this near-unanimous result is closely related to the high concentration of on-chain governance rights: data shows that the current top four WLFI wallets hold approximately 40% of the voting power. When the political halo combines with a highly concentrated discourse power, the public's doubts about “who the project ultimately serves” extend from simple financial logic to governance ethics.

In this narrative context, the passing of the large-scale internal unlocking proposal further amplifies the community's higher demands for conflict of interest disclosure. This proposal primarily targets internal stakeholders such as early supporters, the founding team, advisors, and partners, and although it is designed with a unlocking cycle of up to 4 to 5 years (including a 2-year cliff period), and offers a 10% voluntary burn option, the governance transparency still has blind spots until the public materials disclose the specific holding and voting details of the Trump family or related entities at the on-chain address level. When endorsements from political figures become a core part of the project's value, the risks of concentrated on-chain governance are often interpreted by the market as a collaboration of internal interests. Currently, regulatory agencies have not publicly expressed their stance on this unlocking arrangement, but under the driving of political narrative, how the project balances internal incentives with public interest disclosure will be a long-term challenge it faces during the unlocking execution period in the coming years.

Pay Attention to These Key Governance Signals Next

After the unlocking proposal for 62 billion WLFI passes with a high approval rate of 99.5%, subsequent on-chain governance dynamics will become core indicators for evaluating the project's competitive landscape. Investors should focus on tracking the trends in token distribution and voting power evolution, especially whether the current situation of the top four wallets holding about 40% of voting power will become further concentrated as the proposal is executed. According to the proposal rules, tokens that do not actively accept the new unlocking plan will enter a permanently locked state but retain governance rights, providing internal stakeholders with a choice of “giving up liquidity in exchange for long-term control.” In the coming period, whether stakeholders choose to voluntarily burn 10% of their tokens in exchange for partial unlocking after the 2-year cliff, or choose to maintain permanent locking, will directly reflect the core circle’s real preferences regarding the long-term value of the project and governance weights.

Furthermore, since this proposal was announced as passed on April 30, ahead of the May 7 deadline reported by some media, its governance process's transparency and standardization still need to be further observed through subsequent proposals. During the 2-year cliff period, although the 62 billion tokens will not immediately impact the market, governance votes involving adjustments to the token economic model, protocol fee allocations, or key business shifts will become a litmus test for the current governance structure’s practical performance. The trade-offs among the long unlocking cycles of 4 to 5 years, additional burn constraints, and highly concentrated governance rights form the mid-to-long-term basis of the WLFI valuation narrative. In the absence of immediate market data support, the breadth of participation in on-chain governance and the voting direction of new proposals will be the most direct window for outsiders to insight into the internal interest collaboration of this project with a special background.

Join our community to discuss together and become stronger!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
AiCoin On-chain: https://aicoin.com/hyperliquid
AiCoin Exclusive Hyperliquid Benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin Exclusive Aster Benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。