On July 1, 2026, what should have been just an ordinary trading day was compressed into an extremely crowded time node due to the overlap of technology companies, personnel changes, on-chain governance, policy relaxation, and political financial disclosures: Phantom announced the integration of three core members of the Ventuals team into its own system, translating their accumulated experience from operating OpenAI and Anthropic perpetual futures markets on Hyperliquid into a perpetual contract business layout aimed at a broader user base; almost simultaneously, ENS DAO completed a snapshot vote on a proposal to renew the security council for two years, which was rejected with an approximately 82% disapproval rate, while co-founder Nick Johnson, holding about 3.26 million ENS tokens and approximately 80% of the voting weight, guided the outcome, stating in the explanation that he would abstain from the formal vote, while also emphasizing his support for the continuation of the council system but not accepting the current member list, making this failure more like an open game about power structures and personnel arrangements; on the other end of the technical narrative, the U.S. Department of Commerce notified Anthropic that it was lifting export controls on two models, Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5, and Anthropic announced it would restore access the next day, yet specific terms and applicable regions had not been disclosed, adding a typical policy boon scenario to the AI and crypto narrative; meanwhile, the political narrative reached a climax with Trump's financial disclosure — he confirmed that in 2025, he gained at least $1.4 billion from crypto and meme coin-related income through entities such as World Liberty Financial and CIC Digital LLC, with the former generating over $594 million and the latter approximately $636 million, marking the clear coordinates of political figures deeply embedded in the crypto business; however, on the same day these positive and power restructuring stories unfolded, U.S. crypto concept stocks broadly fell on July 1: Circle plummeted by 17.55%, Strategy dropped 6.20%, Bitmine Immersion, SharpLink, and Bullish also declined by 3.55%, 2.44%, and 1.10% respectively; the declines were notable but there was no single clear bearish factor to explain this adjustment, the coexistence of policy relaxation and price weakening, technological advancement and political profit-seeking on the same trading day made this day a highly concentrated time node of mixed signals and structural contradictions.
Phantom Poaches Ventuals Wallet for Perpetual
The trajectory of Ventuals completed a closed loop suddenly on July 1: previously, they operated perpetual futures markets around OpenAI and Anthropic on Hyperliquid and earlier this month chose to gradually shut down these AI-themed perpetuities, laying the groundwork for the team's next movement. Now Phantom confirms the inclusion of all three core members of the Ventuals team, Alvin Hsia, Emily Hsia, and Aris Samad, clearly positioning to strengthen its perpetual contract business, allowing an originally protocol-side AI perpetual attempt to ultimately settle as a derivative capability within the wallet product.
Phantom, originally starting as a crypto wallet, has long played the role of asset custody and basic transaction entry; by bringing in a mature perpetual team, it effectively shifts the “payment tool” forward to “derivative trading front end,” directly participating in the competition where users choose to initiate leverage and contract trading. For the perpetual narrative, this signals a shift from merely chasing new targets to competing for control of end-user access; for users, the perpetual opening path may further concentrate from the exchange interface towards the wallet side; for the wallet track, being able to provide a smoother contract trading experience beyond safe custody is becoming a new watershed.
ENS Whales Vote Down Security Council
Switching from the perpetual access competition to power distribution at the protocol level, the ENS DAO snapshot vote on July 1 brought the contradiction of “who should steer protocol security” to the forefront. The proposal to renew the security council was not radical; it simply planned to extend the terms of the current council by two years, yet faced overwhelming rejection during the voting phase. According to AiCoin data, the opposition vote ratio was about 82%, but the more critical aspect was the highly concentrated voting power behind it: co-founder Nick Johnson holds about 3.26 million ENS, accounting for about 80% of the voting weight in the votes cast, meaning a single address nearly decided the fate of the entire proposal.
Nick intentionally delineated several boundaries in the snapshot explanation: on one hand, he explicitly stated that he would choose to abstain from subsequent formal on-chain voting, emphasizing that he did not want personal will to influence governance conclusions in the long term; on the other hand, he specified his support for the security council to “extend this institutional arrangement,” only disagreeing with the composition of the current member list. This “support the mechanism, disagree with the list” voting stance reflects a layer of reality often overlooked in DAO governance — representativeness and decision-making power do not necessarily coincide. The concentration of tokens leads to a decision-making power that can veto specific proposals, while the “I support this system but oppose this council’s members” statement exposes the community's tug-of-war between risk control, power concentration, and trust: if the cost of security is allowing a few large whales to control key positions long-term, then the next question that ENS and the broader DAO community must answer is how to ensure governance appears sufficiently fair without sacrificing resilience against attacks.
Anthropic Export Ban Lifted, AI Boosts Crypto Imagination
On the same day the ENS community debated “who should hold the safety button,” the U.S. regulators provided a more direct answer to another technological narrative. Anthropic confirmed in an official statement that the U.S. Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5, two high-performance models that were previously listed under export controls, and access will be restored on the day following the company's notification receipt. Specific applicable regions, terms, and quotas have not yet been disclosed, but the shift in attitude from “ban” to “relaxation” itself is enough for the market to interpret it as a policy boon for the cross-border use of cutting-edge AI capabilities.
For the crypto circle, such benefits initially occur at the narrative level. Over the past year, the imagination of “AI and crypto integration” has mostly remained within white papers and roadshows, with high-performance models being strictly regulated, making concepts like decentralized computing networks and on-chain inference markets feel more like theoretical plans rather than executable business. Now that some top models have had export restrictions lifted, it means that in the future, whether concerning compliance custody rights or on-chain settlement regarding inference results and data labeling, they can be incorporated into the design space more boldly, and this expectation itself will strengthen the presence of “AI + crypto” as an independent investment theme.
However, in the secondary market, this policy boon did not immediately translate into price performance. On the evening of July 1, U.S. crypto concept stocks collectively fell, with publicly available data showing that Circle (CRCL) dropped 17.55%, Strategy (MSTR) declined 6.20%, and Bitmine Immersion (BMNR), SharpLink (SBET), and Bullish (BLSH) recorded declines in the 1%-4% range. The report did not provide any clear triggering factors, and there is currently no direct correlation between this round of adjustment and specific regulatory or macroeconomic bearishness, which can only be viewed as a short-term divergence between the “technological and policy good news” and “capital markets choosing to reduce exposure” within the same time window. The misalignment of technical narratives and stock price performance is a clear slice of the current complexity in market sentiment regarding crypto and AI.
Trump's Crypto Income Exposes Power-Business Link
The financial data disclosed within the same time window brought another more subtle power clue into the spotlight. Trump revealed that in 2025, his income from crypto and meme coin-related businesses reached at least $1.4 billion, with two major entities forming the absolute core: one is World Liberty Financial, co-founded with his son and official Steven Witkoff, which alone contributed over $594 million in revenue; the other is CIC Digital LLC, responsible for meme coin licensing, which approximately generated $636 million from royalty sharing. The report did not list other details, but beyond these two segments, the total still reaches into the billion-level, means that the crypto narrative has already evolved from a campaign slogan to a concrete business engine.
This structure is difficult for the public to simply regard as “ordinary side business.” World Liberty Financial itself combines family capital, government connections, and crypto products, while CIC Digital LLC transforms internet cultural symbols into high-margin financial licensing businesses. When policymakers have such substantial direct benefits from the crypto and meme coin industry chain, any future regulatory action — whether to loosen or tighten — will inevitably be placed under the scrutiny of “whether it is neutral.” This financial disclosure does not provide regulatory answers but significantly deepens the narrative of “political power intertwining with crypto business interests,” preemptively outlining battle lines for the upcoming debates around industry rules, electoral strategies, and even conflicts of interest, making it increasingly difficult for the crypto landscape to return to the margins in the power contest at the highest levels in the U.S.
General Stock Decline and Misalignment of Long and Short Signals
On the same trading day that talent mobility, governance restructuring, policy relaxation, and political financial disclosure pushed the crypto narrative to a climax, according to AiCoin data, U.S. crypto concept stocks collectively provided a lukewarm price response. Circle (CRCL) fell 17.55%, Strategy (MSTR) dropped 6.20%, Bitmine Immersion (BMNR) down 3.55%, SharpLink (SBET) down 2.44%, and Bullish (BLSH) down 1.10%. From the structure of the declines, it wasn’t an isolated sector or individual theme that was targeted, but rather a “full row of red lights” from trading infrastructure to derivative narratives, from liquidity platforms to peripheral services, forming an intuitive sense of misalignment with the complex and diverse signals stemming from Phantom’s integration of core members of Ventuals, the ENS DAO's completion of a key governance rejection, Anthropic's export restriction lift, and Trump’s large crypto income exposure.
What’s more worth noting on the timeline is that current materials have not locked in any directly identifiable triggering factors: there's no specified macroeconomic data impact, nor is there a single regulatory bearishness directly corresponding to the fundamentals of these companies. This means we cannot easily link the stock price declines in a causal chain to any policy decision or governance vote, and can only categorize it within the framework of “declining risk appetite” sentiment. In the context of high-frequency intermingling of long and short narratives alongside the sequential emergence of institutional and technological benefits, the secondary market opted for a general decline to preemptively price in uncertainties; this round of decline can only be temporarily viewed as a negative feedback on sentiment, whether it can be corrected by fundamentals and policy signals remains to be answered by the market.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
