How to Uncover Berachain PUA Speech, Principles, and Logic The community's criticism of Berachain seems to have been heard by the project team, but it seems that they have not fully responded. Many project parties in the market are filled with this ineffective reflection of "rationalization after the fact", which may seem sincere at first glance, but lacks any substantive content. If all reflections are reflected in the statement of 'if we could start over', then this is not reflection, it is just a market public relations behavior. The reason is simple. 1. At the beginning, when designing token economics, the fairness of community distribution and VC distribution should be considered. The current so-called reflection can only indicate that from the beginning, they highly recognized the rationality of selling tokens to VC, rather than the so-called long-term construction. A light and airy phrase like 'if I could start over' has no essential difference from confessing to a scumbag/domestic violence man. Because there is a very clever linguistic logic hidden here, because once you believe in the premise assumption of 'if you could start over', his mistake becomes irrelevant. This has a proprietary term in psychology called counterfactual thinking (weakening responsibility) and cognitive dissociation (making mistakes appear unimportant). All those who do not intend to admit their mistakes are very accustomed to using hypothetical reflection to cover up their true mistakes and gain sympathy. The correct way to admit a mistake should be to understand why you did it at the time, and to openly acknowledge that it was a hasty decision made for quick success. 2. Repurchase as a remedial measure is very unconvincing and ineffective. I'll ask, where does the repurchase fund come from? Does your fund still come from community/user contributions? Is it possible that you want to issue more tokens. If you can't explain this clearly, then it's just a case of using community contributions to continue cashing out and paying for VC. This is a proprietary term in psychology called symbolic compensation. In other words, to cover up my mistake, I symbolically compensate, but this is not! Yes! Really! Exactly! Wait! Price! of All those who do not intend to correct their mistakes are very accustomed to using evasive methods to cover up their mistakes and try to reconcile. If you are truly correcting your mistakes, you should not say that you are striving to repurchase, but rather that you should disclose in detail what specific actions you have taken in the past period to restore the reputation of the community@ berachain