Yeah, it's not because I didn't get the staking reward. I have always believed that the success or failure of Babylon is related to the breakthrough of the entire BTCFi sector, and is the core narrative that has the opportunity to break through the ceiling. I have communicated with a lot of BTCFi protocols, and I sincerely hope that this track can run out. In this direction, I have received a lot of feedback from staking, early suggestions, and airdrop distributors. But today, Babylon's performance shattered my judgment. It not only disappoints staking users, but if it fails, it can be considered a failure for the entire industry. If even such a platform cannot treat co builders kindly, what will BTCFi rely on next? Many people have not participated in BTC staking at all, just standing at the "conventional hair picking logic" to see the project, naturally unable to understand which group of people are hurt and how deeply they are hurt. Many people, including many KOLs, actually did not participate in BTC staking at all. They don't know how high Babylon's gas consumption is, let alone that staking BTC represents the biggest narrative of BTCFi! It plays a dual role of "infrastructure+security layer" for BTCFi and is a key pivot for the future of BTCFi. Pledged users are not simply "users", but participants, validators, and pressure bearers in this experiment. The disappointment brought about by the failure of this airdrop is not due to the lack of money, but rather a misalignment of values. If you can't even take care of the person who first walked into the deep waters with you, then tell me, why did BTCFi come out?