You said Binance has the right to vote. Yes, Binance can certainly vote. But Binance's vote is to 'abolish the voting mechanism itself'. It's like casting a vote in a democratic society, and the result is: 'Starting from tomorrow, cancel the election and all power belongs to me.' This is not exercising governance rights, but a 'institutional suicide' disguised as governance. The governance model is not about 'whoever holds the most shares at the moment wins', but about' whoever is willing to contribute to the project in the long run by locking up and voting will '. This operation has undermined the incentive and trust logic of the VE model itself, leading to a direct collapse of community governance. This is not exercising power, but using tactics to break through the institutional structure. Ordinary large households vote based on long-term holdings and expectations of common interests. But this time, Binance is personally clearing the disobedient community DAO by the controlling party who holds on chain resources, voting rules, ecological structure, money, and discourse power. This is not governance, this is the power center directly eliminating community game opponents, it is capital cleansing, not market cooperation. Please do not use 'Binance has the right to vote' to whitewash political changes. Today you think they are just voting, but tomorrow you will find that you are not qualified to vote at all. Do not use "formal justice" to cover up "substantive violence", as it may seem reasonable but overlooks the most crucial point - this is not an ordinary large-scale participation in governance, but a clearing act of the power center personally taking back control.