It's a bit interesting. Just a few days ago, I saw OKX Web3 wallet set up liquidity on Alpha. Today, BNBChain also has @ uptopmeme, a unilateral liquidity provider, and liquidity is still a battleground for the military. Recently, I have been brushing Alpha again and I also feel that not all Alphas have good liquidity. After brushing for so many days, everyone may be brushing ZKJ again mainly because of its good depth and low wear and tear. However, the biggest problem with bilateral liquidity is that if the popularity of this token decreases, it is very likely to acquire a lot of coins. Even if liquidity is maintained within a certain range, it is possible to incur losses due to the decline in coin prices, especially with the current situation where altcoins are prone to falling but too difficult to rise. Therefore, unilaterally adding liquidity can indeed reduce the risk of altcoins, but the problem is not without its drawbacks. How to operate unilateral liquidity, what to do if the liquidity of altcoins and BNB does not match, what is the matching mechanism, and how to ensure returns? These are all issues that need to be addressed for unilateral liquidity, especially during the peak of DeFi in 2021 when there were also unilateral liquidity pools, but they were settled in USDT at that time, so it was slightly better. The current BNB settlement plan is definitely good. If there is a more detailed mechanism to match Alpha's high traffic, it may really be an opportunity to earn BNB.