Trump gave a positive response to Musk's Party formation, which I think is quite appropriate. From the previous responses, it can be seen that the two main reasons for the reversal between the two sides are: 1. The cancellation of subsidies for electric vehicles; 2. People recommended by Musk are not allowed to be the director of NASA. I agree with both of the above points: 1. The backward power generation and fragile power grid in the United States do not support the large-scale development of electric vehicles, and the country is not short of oil and gas. On the contrary, China has strong power generation and transmission capabilities, and it is not short of coal but oil and gas. It is unreasonable to force the promotion of electric vehicles without considering the reality of national resources. As for environmental protection, it is another matter. 2. People recommended by Musk are not allowed to serve as directors of NASA. Not only because the other party is a Democrat, but also because they are too close to Musk. Musk's SpaceX is a strategic resource, and installing a nuclear warhead would be an intercontinental ballistic missile. He cannot be both an athlete and a referee. If the management resources are also in his hands, it is obviously inappropriate, not only for the growth of other competitors, but also for national security. So Trump said, "My primary responsibility is to protect the American public.".