Linea @LineaBuild In my opinion, Linea's approach towards LXP-L users is very unreasonable. The official guidance for users to participate in LXP and LXP-L activities, where everyone provides liquidity and bears financial risks according to the rules, but there are no rewards at all during the TGE stage, which itself is a betrayal of user trust. 1. LXP stands for 'Task Score', while LXP-L stands for 'LP Score' 2 LXP， 9% of users will be airdropped, TGE will be released in this round, and the cost of Voyage activities is relatively high, including POH costs. TGE must have rewards. 3 LXP-L， In the 75% range, it is released when not in TGE. That is to say, there are no rewards. In fact, when it comes to real capital hedging and LP operations, although the cost of GAS is lower, the capital cost and risk borne by these users are higher. Real pledge of assets, bearing multiple risks such as unpredictable losses and price fluctuations are required. Compared to simple task-based LXP users, the participation threshold and sunk costs for LXP-L users are also very high. 4. Currently, Linea has officially allocated the LXP-L reward to the '75% Ecosystem Fund', which will be decided by the Consortium Alliance in the future. This means that LP users may not be able to receive the initial airdrop tokens when TGE is launched, and the dual contributions of time and funds will be delayed in return, which is precisely the most concerned and anticipated part of the community. 5. I feel that Linea officials prioritize LXP users. And lxp-l users are officially said to provide feedback through a longer-term, ongoing mechanism. In my opinion, this is very unreasonable. Initially, I personally believed that the official rules and guidelines of linea should not have been set up without thinking. At least you guided users to participate in activities, and everyone focused on the ratio and share of LXP and LXP-L. However, LXP-L users have no motivation in TGE. To put it more directly, this group of users >Real gold and silver participation, bearing real financial risks >LP plays a more constructive role in the ecosystem, as it directly affects the availability and transaction depth of the protocol. TVL is the cornerstone of ecological liquidity. In my opinion, in the current fiercely competitive L2 project, LP users are the key beneficiaries of the long-term ecosystem, and LP users are the ones that the ecosystem truly needs to bind to for the long term. So: LXP-L incentives should be given during the TGE phase to demonstrate respect for real contributors, otherwise it will chill the hearts of early liquidity supporters. Otherwise, when withdrawing funds, saying the word 'fuck/FUCK' cannot fully express one's inner indignation.