PumpFun's Glass Full Foundation – is a stolen idea? 🚨 A "fund" to support ecosystem growth, that has a lot of holes in it. That's why I want to compare it to Retro9000, the similar foundation Avalanche launched. Both aim to “support the ecosystem,” but the way they do it couldn’t be more different. GFF — http://Pump.fun • Dropped ~1.69M straight into meme tokens on Solana (kept ~352K on the side). • Picks are supposedly “organic” tokens with community momentum, but no one knows the real selection criteria. • Early plays like TOKABU and HOUSE pumped right after buys… long-term effect still TBD. • Feels more like a liquidity injection experiment than a structured growth plan. Retro9000 — Avalanche • 40M pool dedicated to retroactive grants for builders who already shipped useful projects. • Transparent process, community voting + structured review decide who gets funded. • First round (April 2025 snapshot) rewarded 19 projects with over 1M total. • Targeting real infrastructure & tooling that strengthens the chain for the long run. TL:DR • GFF = flashy buys, quick pops, mystery rules. • Retro9000 = big budget, clear process, long-term builder incentives. If @pumpdotfun wants GFF to go beyond meme hype, it’ll need more transparency and strategy, not just quick-fire token pumps.(Hanzo ㊗️)