Author: Cookie
On August 22, Iryna Zarutska was murdered on a light rail train. On September 10, Charlie Kirk was shot and killed during a speech. In less than a month, two tragedies occurred in the United States, shocking the nation and drawing global attention.
There is no direct causal relationship between these two cases. However, as the "violent murder case" that garnered nationwide attention escalated into a "politicized event," it becomes difficult to discuss these two incidents separately.
In the cryptocurrency community, there was a period of speculation around the meme coins $IRYNA and $CHARLIE related to these two cases. From the perspective of players in the Chinese-speaking community, the understanding of these two tokens differs significantly from that of English-speaking players (especially those in the U.S. cryptocurrency community), leading to confusion. For example:
Isn't the impact of the Charlie Kirk case greater than that of Iryna Zarutska? Why is the highest market cap of $CHARLIE lower than that of $IRYNA?
Is the event that Musk and Trump both commented on not able to reach the heights of $PNUT because the on-chain market is not doing well?
By reviewing the fermentation process of the events and observing the huge controversies on Twitter, we may be able to provide answers to these questions from a more comprehensive perspective.
The case of Iryna Zarutska being murdered on the subway occurred on August 22, but the $IRYNA token was not deployed until September 6. Moreover, on September 6 and 7, the highest market cap of $IRYNA did not even exceed $1 million.
If we search for discussions on Twitter after the incident, we will find that it had already attracted significant attention shortly after it occurred. On August 26, Musk replied to a related tweet, asking, "Why isn't the killer in prison?"
The main tweet Musk interacted with received over 37,000 retweets and 144,000 likes.
However, at this time, the surveillance footage of Iryna Zarutska's murder had not yet been disclosed, which created a "vacuum period" between the incident and the token deployment. The surveillance video from the crime scene was released on September 6, Beijing time, and we could subsequently see related discussions on Twitter.
The tweet above was posted at 5 AM Beijing time on September 6, but there were still over 10 hours until the token was deployed. During this smaller "vacuum period," the surveillance footage from the crime scene was shared on Twitter and quickly gained traction.
On September 7, when asked about the case, Trump called it "horrific" and promised to fully grasp the situation. On September 8, during a speech at the Bible Museum in Washington, D.C., Trump linked the case to his plans to send federal agents and the National Guard to Chicago and other Democrat-controlled cities. In addition to expressing condolences to the victim's family, he stated, "Evil people are out there, and if we can't deal with it, our country will cease to exist."
Trump also posted on Truth Social, "The blood of this innocent woman drips from the killer's knife, and now her blood is on the hands of those Democrats who refuse to put bad people in prison."
In this post, he also targeted Roy Cooper, calling him a "former powerless governor" and "someone who wants to be a senator." Of course, Trump doesn't insult without a purpose; the post ends with a call to support Republican Michael Whatley.
At this point, the incident had transformed from an independent violent murder case into a politicized event.
Regarding the $IRYNA token, it is counterintuitive that Trump's influence on its price performance may not be as significant as Musk's.
From the K-line chart, we can see that the highest trading volume occurred at 3 PM on September 10, with a volume close to $17 million, and the token's market cap surged from $9.5 million to nearly $34 million.
At 3 PM on September 10, Musk stated on Twitter that he was willing to donate $1 million to support incentive activities for creating murals of Iryna Zarutska in major U.S. cities.
However, on the evening of September 10, when the White House's official Twitter account also posted Trump's statement calling for the death penalty for the murderer of Iryna, the $IRYNA market showed no reaction.
About three hours after the White House tweet, Charlie Kirk was shot. Approximately two hours later, Trump announced the death of Charlie Kirk.
The Iryna case transitioned from an independent violent murder case to a politicized process, while the case of Charlie Kirk's murder was destined to be a "political assassination" from the start. This is because Charlie Kirk himself is a right-wing political figure in the U.S. Without elaborating too much on Charlie Kirk's political influence, the reactions from various parties after the incident can also provide insight—Utah Governor Spencer Fox characterized the case as a "political assassination," Trump ordered the U.S. flag to be flown at half-mast for four days in mourning, and leaders from other countries, including the British Prime Minister, Israeli Prime Minister, and Argentine President, expressed their condolences on social media…
After the news of the Charlie case broke, $IRYNA quickly plummeted by 50% within half an hour, dropping from a market cap of nearly $18 million to around $9 million. Since then, $IRYNA has not been able to regain its upward momentum, and its current market cap is about $900,000.
However, the funds chasing $CHARLIE have not been able to replicate the market cap heights of $IRYNA; the highest market cap of $CHARLIE has never exceeded $20 million, and its current market cap is only about $260,000.
After clarifying the sequence of events, we will attempt to answer the questions raised at the beginning of the article—why, with such a "hot topic," was it unable to take off?
Incomparable Political Meme
Some players have compared $CHARLIE to $PNUT, as both involve political relevance and discussions. However, there are several inappropriate aspects to this comparison.
First is the "difference in the subject of death." While the tragedy of animal deaths may evoke sympathy and even dissatisfaction with the political status quo, it ultimately does not touch upon the "sanctity" of human life. The manner of death also plays a role; the euthanasia of the squirrel in $PUNT contrasts sharply with the horrific and brutal imagery of Charlie Kirk being shot—bullets struck Charlie's neck, and a large amount of blood gushed out instantly.
The debate over "blood money" has actually occurred in the Chinese-speaking community before, centered around the meme coin $AI171 related to the crash of Air India Flight 171.
Secondly, the timing of the Charlie case coincided perfectly with the peak interest in the Iryna case, during a period when the emotions of division and conflict in American society were relatively high—a "national trauma" that players in the Chinese-speaking community across the ocean find difficult to comprehend.
How intense is the division and conflict in American society? Here we can refer back to a point made at the beginning of the article, that the Iryna case and the Charlie case do not have a direct causal relationship of "the occurrence of the former leading to the latter," yet it is difficult to discuss the two cases separately.
Charlie Kirk had a very clear stance on the Iryna case, believing that it was related to racial issues. He not only frequently posted tweets related to the Iryna case on Twitter but also engaged in a debate with CNN political commentator Van Jones.
The basis for Charlie Kirk's viewpoint is a statement made by the killer in the surveillance footage of the Iryna case, where the killer said, "I got that white girl." The divisive emotions targeting Black individuals triggered by this statement on Twitter were also quite severe. Searching for the keyword "TND," one can find numerous related tweets, some even gaining significant traction.
"We might see TND happen before the release of GTA 6."
"TND" originally has a very racist meaning, standing for "Total N* Death." Radical American Twitter users, after the Iryna case, used "TND" or "Totally Nice Day" to express such racist sentiments to avoid being banned by Twitter.
In such an environment, any arguments defending the meme coins seem pale and powerless. When $IRYNA was rising, there were voices saying, "$IRYNA provided donations for the victim's family." But by the time of $CHARLIE, the English-speaking community was almost entirely accusing "$CHARLIE of being blood money," and the only remaining defense was, "This is the meme coin market; you can choose not to speculate, but the market is like this," which can hardly be considered a rebuttal.
"If you are promoting, issuing tokens, or trying to profit from the hype surrounding the murders of Iryna and Charlie, then you are a very shameful and detestable person." This tweet received over 2,200 likes, and there are many similar tweets.
In fact, some KOLs in the English-speaking community have faced backlash for their "clever" remarks related to these two cases. The most notable example is Rasmr, whose token $rasmr plummeted by about 30% after he posted the following tweet.
"We should do a live stream where the murderer of Iryna's case kills the murderer of Charlie's case." Rasmr has since deleted this tweet.
Lexapro also faced criticism for tweeting, "I am a (trading) profiteer of racial conflict and violence." Lexapro has also deleted this tweet. From the screenshot below, it can be seen that Lexapro previously displayed an affiliate badge for the meme coin trading app Padre, but Padre has now removed Lexapro from its affiliate accounts.
Thus, in the English-speaking community, $IRYNA and $CHARLIE are largely boycotted on moral grounds, which goes far beyond the realm of "hot speculation."
Finally, the $CHARLIE token was deployed immediately after the news of Charlie Kirk's murder broke, unlike $PNUT, which had some time buffer allowing the hype to cool down, making the speculation on related meme coins somewhat acceptable. This led to $CHARLIE being criticized by the public in the same way that merchants who speculated on mask prices at the onset of the pandemic were criticized—no one would consider whether this was "reasonable speculation" at that moment; everyone would just feel it was "cold and ruthless."
As for the poor on-chain market conditions or major exchanges like Binance and OKX no longer listing Solana meme coins, these may still be secondary reasons. Especially regarding CEXs not listing Solana memes, the reaction in the English-speaking community, coupled with the severity of the political events involved, makes it difficult for major exchanges to list either $IRYNA or $CHARLIE.
It can be said that $IRYNA evolved from an initial "hot token" to a "political token," and with the occurrence of the Charlie Kirk case, $CHARLIE became involved in a certain degree of "political correctness." The situations of these two tokens are unprecedented since last year's meme coin bull market, and the significant differences in perspectives between the Chinese-speaking community across the ocean and the English-speaking community (especially American players) have led to a huge divergence in understanding and token price performance.
Even if we say that this is "humanitarian concern" caused by "political correctness," I hope that "humanitarian concern" can become a principle in the meme coin market from now on.
Every day, too many things happen in this world—fortunate good things or painful tragedies. The murders of Iryna and Charlie, aside from politics, remind us that life and death are indifferent, and we never know when death will come.
When tragedy strikes, we are first and foremost living human beings, and only secondarily cryptocurrency players. There are so many things to participate in for speculation; why should we be preoccupied with life and death?
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
