On January 6, in the context of the Japanese government's highest economic council's statements following the release of the meeting minutes on December 25, the market has begun to reassess Japan's monetary policy path. During the meeting, members urged the Bank of Japan to clearly anchor inflation expectations at around 2%, attempting to set a "nominal anchor" for price and wage trends in the coming years after the retreat of cost shocks. However, the official judgment that real wages will not turn positive until 2026 reveals a structural contradiction between price and income recovery. Accompanying this is a growing market concern that the Bank of Japan is "lagging behind the situation" regarding interest rate hikes, with negative real interest rates and high inflation creating a dual pressure: on one hand, suppressing investors' willingness to allocate to Japanese government bonds, and on the other hand, intensifying bets on further increases in Japanese bond yields and amplified fluctuations in the yen.
The Time Discrepancy Between the 2% Inflation Anchor and 2026 Wage Recovery
According to the minutes from the highest economic council meeting held on December 25, member Masayoshi Takeda clearly stated that inflation expectations should be anchored at around 2% in policy communication. He believes that as previous cost-push factors such as energy and import costs gradually dissipate, Japan's inflation structure will potentially shift from "import-driven shocks" to "more endogenous price and wage linkages." Takeda's core judgment is that against the backdrop of current cost shocks receding, real wages will turn positive by 2026, thereby providing some income support and demand foundation for the inflation target around 2%.
The key premise of this path is that after the gradual exit of import-driven inflation pressures, Japan's price increases will no longer primarily depend on import costs but will be driven more by domestic demand, labor market tightness, and corporate pricing power. On one hand, if nominal wages continue to rise in the coming years, under conditions of a tightening labor force and improved corporate profit structures, service prices and some non-tradable goods prices may form a more sustainable endogenous upward trend; on the other hand, if the retreat of cost shocks is too large and the recovery of real household income falls short of expectations, inflation may face the risk of "declining or even reversing" around 2026.
The issue is that there is a clear time discrepancy between anchoring inflation expectations and the pace of wage improvement. Current inflation is already at a high level, while the official judgment is that real wages will only turn positive by 2026, which means that in the next one to two years, Japanese residents may continue to bear the purchasing power squeeze of "prices rising faster than wages." In this context, household consumption tendencies face dual constraints: on one hand, high prices erode disposable income, suppressing discretionary consumption; on the other hand, if the public believes that the 2% inflation target is credible and that wage improvements will lag, they may be more inclined to cut spending in the short term to hedge against future uncertainties. For businesses, this timing mismatch also poses challenges: while the inflation anchor is emphasized at 2%, the demand side's capacity to bear price increases is limited due to sluggish wage growth, forcing companies to repeatedly weigh "maintaining profit margins" against "avoiding a hard landing in demand" in pricing, investment, and wage negotiations.
The Impact of Negative Real Interest Rates Amidst 3% Inflation
● The Basic Pattern of Negative Real Interest Rates: Magdalene Teo, a fixed income analyst responsible for the Asian market at Credit Suisse, pointed out that even though the Bank of Japan has raised interest rates multiple times, under the reality of core CPI at around 3%, Japan's real interest rates remain significantly negative. This means that nominal policy rates are persistently below actual inflation levels, keeping monetary conditions extremely loose compared to other major economies.
● "Lagging Behind the Situation" and the Difficulty of Being Bullish on Japanese Bonds: Teo emphasized that the market is generally concerned that the Bank of Japan is still "lagging behind the situation" in terms of the pace of interest rate hikes. With inflation significantly above the 2% inflation anchor, the speed of nominal rate increases is far behind price rises, leading to insufficient real tightening of monetary policy. She stated that in this environment, "it is still difficult to turn bullish on Japanese government bonds," because once the central bank is forced to catch up, the risk of further rising yields will directly impact existing bond holdings.
● Long-term Mismatch Between Inflation and Interest Rates Suppresses Allocation Willingness: Historically, Japan has long implemented near-zero or even negative interest rate policies, and now that inflation levels have risen to around 3%, the policy and long-term rates remain far below this inflation center, creating a significant mismatch. For domestic and foreign bond investors, this structure means:
● The real returns on Japanese bonds are continuously eroded by inflation, making asset allocation less attractive;
● If the Bank of Japan accelerates interest rate hikes or adjusts the yield curve control (YCC) framework to correct the mismatch, rising government bond yields will lead to price declines, exposing existing positions to capital loss risks;
● This "high inflation + slow nominal rate" pattern encourages investors to bet on further rising yields in advance, rather than actively increasing their holdings of Japanese bonds at current interest rate levels.
● The Chain Effect of Risk Premium Repricing: The long-term mismatch between inflation and policy rates not only undermines the position of Japanese government bonds as a "risk-free rate anchor" but also raises the market's uncertainty premium regarding future policy adjustments. More and more institutions view "when and how quickly the Bank of Japan will catch up with inflation" as a core trading proposition, betting on forward rates, term premiums, and curve steepening, rather than solely relying on the defensive attributes of Japanese bonds. This expectation structure itself constitutes a systemic force that continues to pressure Japanese government bonds.
The Game of Gradual Rate Hikes vs. Lagging Pace
Within Japan, the divergence over the pace of interest rate hikes is spreading from academic and policy circles to the upper echelons of financial institutions. According to market news on January 6, Mitsubishi UFJ's CEO expressed a tendency to believe that the Bank of Japan will raise interest rates in the second half of the year. This statement somewhat aligns with the official tone of "gradual and cautious," which suggests that while observing the evolution of inflation and wage data, the policy rate will only be steadily raised at a more distant point in time to minimize the impact on the fragile economic recovery. However, alongside this relatively mild expectation, there is strong concern in the market that "the rate hikes may still be significantly lagging behind the situation."
Looking back at the discussions over the past month, Bank of Japan officials and several institutions have engaged in heated debates over "the rate may eventually be raised to 0.75%," while institutions like ING have repeatedly emphasized that the pace of rate hikes will likely be "quite gradual" to avoid causing severe pain to the Japanese economy, which has long relied on ultra-loose conditions. The problem is that this gradual path creates strong tension with the current reality of core CPI at around 3% and deeply negative real interest rates: if nominal rates are raised too slowly, the mismatch between inflation and policy rates will solidify for a longer time, further undermining the central bank's credibility.
In trading terms, a fierce battle is unfolding around this tension. Hawkish investors bet that the Bank of Japan will ultimately be forced by inflation and external interest rate pressures to move towards faster rate hikes and significant yield increases, thus tending to short long-term Japanese bonds, position for curve steepening, and even go long on the yen in the foreign exchange market, betting on a tougher future monetary policy. In contrast, the dovish camp believes that the Japanese economy and wage recovery remain quite fragile: under the premise that real wages may not turn positive until 2026, if the central bank raises rates too quickly, it could suppress domestic demand, hurt corporate investment, and drag down stock market valuations. Doves are more inclined to believe that the central bank will adhere to a "gradual rate hike + flexible adjustment" framework, only being forced to adjust the pace when inflation data or external pressures significantly exceed expectations.
The Pressure on the Yen and Japanese Bonds Amidst Global Tightening Trends
The game over the pace of interest rate hikes in Japan is not taking place in isolation but is firmly embedded in the turning point of the global monetary environment. According to Credit Suisse's interpretation, some members of the Bank of Japan explicitly mentioned in the latest meeting minutes that if the overseas environment shifts from monetary easing to rate hikes, Japan may "lag behind the situation" in policy. Meanwhile, the market's expectations for the Federal Reserve to pause rate cuts or even maintain high rates for a longer time have significantly increased the external interest rate pressure on Japan: on one side, major central banks maintain a relatively tight stance, while on the other side, Japan still maintains negative real interest rates against a backdrop of core CPI around 3%, directly affecting capital flows and exchange rate pricing.
In a scenario where global interest rate differentials continue to widen, if Japan raises rates too slowly, the softening yen and capital outflow amplification effects will become risks that cannot be ignored. Investors are motivated to shift funds from low-yield yen assets to high-yield overseas assets through arbitrage trading; hedge funds may continue to use low-interest yen as a funding currency, amplifying cross-border leveraged positions. A further depreciation of the yen may temporarily boost export profits but will also raise domestic prices again through higher import costs, exacerbating the inflation and interest rate mismatch, thus forming a negative feedback loop of "devaluation—import-driven inflation—forced rate hikes."
If external interest rates remain high for longer than expected, and the Bank of Japan cannot stabilize inflation expectations through gradual rate hikes, it will ultimately be forced to "catch up with overseas tightening," leading to more severe impacts on Japan's financial markets. The yield curve of Japanese government bonds may sharply rise and steepen in a short time, with long-term yields jumping not only suppressing government bond valuations but also pushing stock market valuations to be repriced through rising risk-free rates, putting pressure on overvalued growth stocks and long-duration assets. Additionally, if the policy shift is too sudden, it may also trigger significant paper losses on the massive Japanese bonds held by financial institutions, amplifying financial stability risks. These potential chain reactions make "how the external rate hike trend evolves" a key exogenous variable that the Bank of Japan cannot avoid when formulating its own pace.
Can the Inflation Anchor Hold? Three Policy Paths
Regarding the core question of whether the "2% inflation anchor can be stabilized," the market is currently weighing and pricing among three scenario paths. The first is a moderate rate hike scenario: in this path, the Bank of Japan adheres to gradualism, slowly raising the policy rate, allowing monetary conditions to gradually return from extreme looseness to a "slightly loose" state. Meanwhile, inflation, under the retreat of cost shocks and structural adjustments in demand, gradually falls from the current level of around 3% towards 2%, and if Takeda's anticipated turning positive of real wages by 2026 materializes, income improvements will support consumption and prices, making 2% a relatively sustainable center. In this scenario, Japanese bonds may face moderate upward pressure on yields, but overall volatility will be controllable, and the yen is expected to gradually stabilize as the internal and external interest rate differentials narrow.
The second is a passive catch-up scenario: if major overseas economies maintain sustained high interest rates, and the Federal Reserve's "pause in rate cuts" lasts longer than the market expects, the global interest rate differential may remain unfavorable for the yen and Japanese assets for an extended period. Coupled with stubbornly high domestic inflation and slow improvements in real wages, if the Bank of Japan continues to act according to its established gradual pace, it will face triple pressures of yen depreciation, capital outflow, and renewed inflation. In this context, the central bank may be forced to accelerate rate hikes, or even make more aggressive adjustments to the yield curve control framework to restore the balance between inflation and interest rates. This passive catch-up path will almost inevitably be accompanied by amplified volatility in Japanese bonds: yields may rise sharply in the short term, prices may fluctuate significantly, and the curve may experience temporary inversion or rapid steepening, posing severe tests for bond-holding institutions and leveraged positions.
The third scenario is an unexpected cooling: if global and domestic demand in Japan synchronously cools, cost pressures dissipate rapidly, and inflation declines much faster than current official and market expectations, while wage improvements are significantly below expectations, then the Japanese economy may once again face the shadow of "low inflation or even deflation." In this situation, the central bank will have to slow down or even pause the rate hike process, refocusing on boosting demand and avoiding the self-fulfilling nature of deflationary expectations. The 2% inflation anchor may still exist nominally, but in practice, it could evolve into an "unachievable ceiling" rather than a reachable target. For Japanese bonds, this unexpected cooling may temporarily boost safe-haven demand and lower yields, but the underlying cost is weakened growth momentum and pressured corporate profits, leading to sustained compression of stock market valuations.
Key Observational Points for Trading the Japan Story
Currently, the focal point of contradictions in Japan's macro and policy story centers on several mismatches in timing and levels: on one hand, the government and the Bank of Japan continuously reiterate the 2% inflation anchor in official communications, while in reality, core CPI is hovering around 3%, creating a misalignment between "anchor point and reality"; on the other hand, despite multiple rate hikes, policy rates and long-term rates still cannot escape the constraints of negative real interest rates, while officials also judge that real wages will not turn positive until 2026. This means that in the next one to two years, the Japanese economy will be caught in a triple time lag of "high inflation, low rates, and unhealed income," where any deviation in one link could amplify market volatility.
For traders focused on Japanese bonds, the yen, and Japanese equity assets, the observational focus in the coming months will be highly concentrated on three dimensions. First is the core CPI trend, including the speed of inflation decline, the stickiness of service prices, and the marginal contribution of energy and import costs to overall prices, used to assess whether inflation is converging towards the 2% inflation anchor or forming a "new normal" around 3%. Second is the results of key wage negotiations such as the spring labor negotiations, where whether real wage growth can align with the official judgment of turning positive by 2026 will directly determine the resilience of household consumption and the sustainability of endogenous inflation. Third is the subtle changes in the Bank of Japan's communication tone, including the intensity of expressions regarding "lagging behind the situation," the level of attention to external interest rate differentials, and forward guidance on future rate hike pace, all of which are prerequisite variables for market betting paths.
In different inflation and wage combination scenarios, the bullish and bearish betting logic on Japan's rate hike trajectory and asset prices will also diverge. If inflation remains high while wage recovery is slow, hawks will have more reason to reinforce the "forced catch-up" trade, shorting Japanese bonds and going long on the yen, betting on a faster and steeper rate hike path; if inflation smoothly declines to 2% and wages turn positive as expected around 2026, then the story of "moderate rate hikes + soft landing" will be more convincing, favoring a moderate rise in Japanese bond yields, stabilization of the yen, and maintaining high valuations in the Japanese stock market supported by profit improvements. Conversely, if inflation unexpectedly declines rapidly while wages remain weak, the market will shift to betting that the Bank of Japan will revert to a dovish stance, delaying or even pausing rate hikes, while increasing long positions in the bond market and maintaining higher caution towards equities and the yen. In other words, "Japan's anchoring of 2% inflation" is not a static target but a multidimensional betting battlefield concerning inflation, wages, and policy pace, where the true determinants of victory will be every subtle deviation between data and policy communication over the next two years.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
