Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

It was unexpected that a "case sensitivity battle" similar to neiro and NEIRO could have a sequel.

Odaily Note: For the backstory, refer to “Neiro and NEIRO listed on Binance, is the Meme coin track facing a turning point?”

Today, the controversy surrounding eliza and ELIZA has become the most discussed topic in the market, even affecting the popular AI concept meme token ai16z, which saw a sharp short-term drop — GMGN data shows that ai16z fell to a low of $0.181, and as of around 17:30, it was reported at $0.269, a 24-hour decline of 35.9%.

Odaily Planet Daily summarizes the story as follows.

First, regardless of the case of the token, the so-called Eliza (or eliza or ELIZA, denoted with a $ symbol for distinction in the following text) originally refers to an AI Agent supported by ai16z. The virtual image corresponding to Eliza is shown in the image below, depicting a black-haired girl in an orange outfit themed around ai16z.

Initially, Eliza did not have any tokens. As ai16z continued to gain popularity, Eliza's image itself also acquired certain meme attributes.

Lowercase $eliza takes the lead

Around 4:00 AM Beijing time on November 17 (based on GMGN opening data), the AI Agent token launch platform vvaifu.fun automatically generated and released the lowercase token $eliza, with the team's explanation being, “Shaw (the founder of ai16z) claimed he never intended to create the Eliza token, so we took the initiative to do this for the community.”

From the updates officially reposted by the $eliza team, Shaw indeed made a similar statement on November 10 and expressed welcome for the community to launch tokens — although Shaw's original words were welcoming the community to launch Eliza the agent, the subsequent mention of CTO (Community Take Over) suggests that Shaw was likely referring to welcoming the community to launch tokens.

According to community feedback, to reward ai16z's contributions, $eliza also airdropped 7% of its supply to ai16z as a thank you.

Once launched, $eliza received enthusiastic support from the community, soaring to a high of $0.0566, corresponding to a market cap of approximately $56 million.

Uppercase $ELIZA stirs the pot

Everything seemed normal until the afternoon of November 19 when the situation suddenly changed.

Around 2:00 PM on November 19, the uppercase $ELIZA suddenly emerged and quickly surpassed a market cap of $20 million within 10 minutes; by 2:30 PM, Shaw directly posted the $ELIZA contract on X, clearly stating that $ELIZA was the token issued with ai16z's participation — and by that time, the market cap of $ELIZA had already exceeded $50 million.

As soon as Shaw's statement was made, $eliza immediately plummeted, quickly dropping from around $0.026 to a low of $0.007 within 5 minutes, with a maximum decline exceeding 70%.

In contrast, $ELIZA surged, reaching a high of over $0.1, corresponding to a market cap exceeding $100 million.

Although Shaw mentioned that 10% of the $ELIZA supply would be airdropped to $eliza holders, the holders of $eliza clearly did not buy it, questioning Shaw's behavior of promoting the new token as contradictory (having previously stated there would be no token issuance), harming the genuine interests of those who had invested in $eliza.

More importantly, due to the rapid early rise of $ELIZA (which surged before Shaw's announcement), there was hardly any profit space left for the community, further fueling their anger, with many users even accusing Shaw of conspiracy and manipulation.

Additionally, the community discovered that another partner of ai16z, Logan, had been selling $eliza all day while buying $ELIZA, which also exacerbated the decline of $eliza.

Is it "lowercase rushing ahead" or "uppercase taking a bite"?

In the updates supporting $ELIZA, Shaw mentioned that “for the past two weeks, we have been planning this token release with the collaborating team,” implying that the launch of $ELIZA was not a spur-of-the-moment decision after seeing the success of $eliza, and perhaps explaining his contradictory behavior, emphasizing that the launch of $ELIZA was executed by another collaborating team.

As community doubts intensified, Shaw held two spaces and released a lengthy response. In his response, Shaw mentioned that he had been preparing for the token launch with the aforementioned collaborating team for two weeks, originally planning to release it last Friday, but it was unexpectedly moved to this Monday, and he did not anticipate the sudden emergence of an unfamiliar team issuing $eliza over the weekend… Shaw even directly referred to the appearance of $eliza as “frontran” and expressed that he felt very sad about his long-prepared project being taken away.

On the other hand, the $eliza team believes that Shaw's actions are akin to “taking food from the bowl.” The team has repeatedly posted on X, stating that Shaw's behavior is merely an attempt to steal the achievements of $eliza, wanting to claim everything for himself; the airdrop of 10% of tokens to $eliza holders is merely to save face for Shaw…

Community disputes continue, warning of a three-way loss situation

The conflict surrounding $eliza and $ELIZA has led to ongoing community disputes.

The current outcome is that $eliza has been significantly cut down, ai16z has also seen a substantial decline due to this incident, and although $ELIZA is temporarily maintaining its upward trend, both the token and Shaw's personal reputation have suffered a severe blow.

Currently, $eliza holders hope to steer the narrative towards “the community power battling against a conspiracy group,” replicating the story of neiro's comeback against NEIRO. However, as a similar plot unfolds for the second time, the community is bound to experience some aesthetic fatigue; while $eliza has gradually stabilized at a low level, the rebound trend is not yet obvious, and investors still need to be wary of the risk of a weakening narrative, DYOR.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。