Recently, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and cryptocurrency giant Binance, along with its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ), jointly filed a motion requesting the court to suspend the ongoing legal proceedings between the two parties for 60 days, attracting widespread attention in the market. The document submitted to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on February 10 states that this move aims to wait for the SEC's newly established cryptocurrency working group to formulate industry regulatory guidelines.
It is reported that the cryptocurrency working group was established by acting SEC Chair Mark T. Uyeda on January 21 and is led by SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce. Its core task is to build a regulatory framework for digital assets, and its work results may directly impact the regulatory direction of cryptocurrencies, including the Binance lawsuit. Both the SEC and Binance have stated that pausing the lawsuit aligns with the principle of judicial efficiency and is expected to create conditions for an early settlement between the two parties.
In this lawsuit, in addition to Binance Holdings Limited and Changpeng Zhao, two affiliated companies responsible for operating Binance U.S. (Binance.US), BAM Trading Services Inc. and BAM Management US Holdings Inc., are also named as defendants. The SEC previously accused these entities of "flagrantly ignoring" federal securities laws and engaging in multiple violations, including operating an unregistered exchange, acting as unregistered broker-dealers, and improperly clearing crypto assets, thereby violating U.S. securities regulations and intentionally neglecting investor protection.
In the joint motion, all parties emphasized that pausing the lawsuit would effectively save resources for the court and the participants in the litigation. If a settlement is ultimately reached, it could avoid subsequent discovery procedures and eliminate the need for the court to further review the defendants' previously filed motions to dismiss. The legal teams of Binance and its affiliates, along with SEC lawyers, have clearly stated that this pause is a temporary measure and will not affect the existing court deadlines.
The legal community generally believes that while courts typically do not encourage indefinite pauses in litigation, in specific circumstances, a short-term pause can indeed enhance litigation efficiency. The motion cites legal precedents to argue that this brief pause aligns with the principles of procedural fairness and efficiency. In the document, both parties jointly request the court: "The parties respectfully request that the court approve this joint motion to pause."
Whether the court will approve this request and whether there will be a need to extend the pause will become the focus of market attention. According to the plan, if the request is approved, both parties will submit a joint status report at the end of the 60-day period, reporting on the progress of the working group and the subsequent handling of the case. Market analysts point out that if the SEC working group can provide clear regulatory guidelines, it may help resolve the SEC's accusations against Binance and its affiliates and potentially facilitate a settlement. A deeper impact lies in the fact that the final ruling of this case may set an important precedent for the future regulatory model of the U.S. cryptocurrency industry.
It is worth noting that some legal experts have interpreted this lawsuit pause as a signal that U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory policy may undergo a significant shift. Former SEC New York Regional Office Assistant Director Robert Heim believes that the key statement in the joint motion mentioning the SEC's newly established working group and its work "may affect and facilitate a potential resolution of this case" suggests that the SEC may be reevaluating its interpretation of the applicability of securities laws in the cryptocurrency field. He further pointed out that if this policy adjustment is reflected in the Binance case, similar lawsuits against other crypto giants like Coinbase, Ripple, and Kraken may also face suspension or reevaluation.
However, Yuliya Guseva, director of the Blockchain and Fintech program at Rutgers University and a law professor, takes a cautious stance. She told Decrypt that while it is a fact that the SEC is reevaluating its cryptocurrency regulatory policy, it is premature to assert that the SEC has completely changed its crypto policy or that Binance and other crypto companies have "safely reached the shore." She cautioned the market to remain vigilant and avoid overinterpreting or making erroneous assumptions. Guseva also pointed out that Binance may still choose to settle with the SEC, just as it previously paid a hefty fine to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to resolve related accusations.
Despite differing opinions, the pause in this lawsuit undoubtedly sends a positive signal to Binance and other cryptocurrency businesses operating in the U.S., generating new expectations in the market regarding the future direction of U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory policy. In this new era of regulatory policy adjustments, the crypto industry may encounter new development opportunities, but maintaining a cautiously optimistic attitude may still be the wisest choice at this time.
AiCoin Official Website: www.aicoin.com
Telegram: t.me/aicoincn
Twitter: x.com/AiCoinzh
Email: support@aicoin.com
Group Chat: Customer Service Yingying、Customer Service KK
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
