If users have suffered financial losses due to the recent FDUSD de-pegging and wish to seek legal recourse, they first need to have some basic legal knowledge. If they really don't understand, they can also use AI tools like ChatGPT or DeepSeek for preliminary understanding.
Currently, there are mainly two parties that can be sued:
- Sue Justin Sun
The premise is that if Justin's statements are false, constitute rumor-mongering, and these statements directly or indirectly led to the FDUSD de-pegging and market panic, causing user losses.
However, note that the legal basis for this lawsuit must be established on the result of FDT officially suing Justin and ultimately winning the case.
In other words, if FDT can prove that Justin's statements are defamatory and the court rules in favor of FDT, then users may have the possibility to further sue Justin on the grounds of "spreading false information leading to losses."
- Sue FDT (First Digital)
The premise is that if what Justin said is true, that is, FDT indeed has asset commingling (for example, TUSD and FDUSD do not have asset isolation), or the audit report is false or seriously misleading, then FDT can be sued for false advertising, misleading statements, or fraudulent behavior.
If FDT is ultimately proven to have disclosed significantly false information (such as insufficient asset reserves or falsified audit reports), then users can directly use this as a basis to sue FDT.
Additionally, if FDT's auditing company is found to have provided a false audit report, users may also consider including the auditing firm as a co-defendant (joint liability).
Why are these directions feasible?
Clear parties: Both FDT and Justin are publicly identifiable and directly related to the FDUSD project.
Clear jurisdiction: FDT is registered in Hong Kong, and its auditing company is also in Hong Kong, where foreigners are allowed to file civil lawsuits, and the procedures are relatively transparent.
http://3.xn--vuq861b The blockchain can verify that FDT provided an audit report, Justin made public statements, and there are traces left by media and on-chain data, making the evidence traceable.
Regarding the possibility of suing other parties
Suing other individuals or companies must meet two conditions:
There must be clear infringement actions or a chain of responsibility (such as participating in false advertising, price manipulation, misleading disclosures, etc.);
There must be a realistic lawsuit scenario and legal jurisdiction, meaning the lawsuit must be filed in the location where the company is registered or where the actions occurred, and cannot be arbitrarily filed across countries.
The most critical thing right now is to observe the development of the legal battle between FDT and Justin, as it will directly determine whether users can smoothly initiate a legal recourse against one party. All legal responsibilities need to be based on evidence, and it is recommended that users keep records of their financial losses, transaction timestamps, and screenshots of on-chain data for potential future class action lawsuits or individual claims.
This is the real logic behind helping you protect your rights, rather than just shouting 🦐🐔8️⃣. If you don't understand, you need to learn; if you don't care about your own assets, who can you expect to help you?
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
