The comparison of the systems between China and the United States is less about democracy versus authoritarianism, and more about capital governance versus party governance.

Capital governance is decentralized, flexible, and easy to correct mistakes. Of course, this is essentially a game between capitals, with the two parties merely serving as the interface for output. The campaign platforms are just a way to package national policies to deceive the public.

The core collaborative mechanism of capital governance is profit, which is both a benefit and a drawback. The drawback lies in short-sightedness, and capital does not regard the public as human beings; at appropriate times, the public is merely fuel.

Party governance, on the other hand, is relatively centralized and has certain monarchical characteristics, with a focus on ownership and long-term stability. However, the challenge of party governance is that it lacks sufficient decentralization and feedback mechanisms for quick corrections.

Both systems are represented in their highest forms in China and the United States. In fact, it is no longer a struggle of systems, but more about the underlying factors: population, economic growth, and so on.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。