Food fraud siphons up to $50 billion annually from the global food industry and jeopardizes public health. If deployed strictly and realistically, blockchain technology could prevent this insidious crime.

However, the issue lies in its high costs. Scalability, cost, interoperability, and integration pose significant barriers. Additionally, there are privacy concerns, regulatory uncertainties, and a long road to stakeholder adoption.

But food fraud will not disappear on its own. As David Carvalho, CEO of Naoris Protocol, observed:

Most people are surprised to hear that food fraud is a problem, but it is a significant issue that causes losses of $30 billion to $50 billion annually in the global food industry. This is just a small fraction of the industry's total value (over $12 trillion), yet it still amounts to the GDP of a small country like Malta.

So, what can be done? How can the implementation of blockchain truly make a difference?

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations points out that food fraud involves deliberately deceiving consumers about the quality or content of the food they purchase.

Essentially, it is the act of intentionally substituting, adding, or removing materials for economic gain.

The types of fraud are diverse and complex, including mislabeling, theft, counterfeiting, and dilution.

Real-world examples abound. In China, melamine was added to milk to falsify protein content; in Europe, horse meat was sold as beef; olive oil is often adulterated with cheaper vegetable oils.

The economic losses are staggering. But when considering reputational damage, regulatory compliance, legal battles, and erosion of consumer loyalty, the actual costs are much higher.

Temujin Louie, CEO of Wanchain, emphasized the vicious cycle caused by food fraud:

A single fraud incident leads to health scares, eroding consumer trust. This weakening of trust can translate into reduced sales for the implicated brand and broader product categories, economically harming legitimate businesses.

The damage should not be calculated merely as the sum of individual losses but viewed as a systemic weakening of the food industry foundation.

The complexity and opacity of global supply chains provide fertile ground for fraud. The cold chain is particularly vulnerable.

Failures in cold chain logistics can lead to spoilage. These failures enable fraudsters to misreport storage conditions or sell damaged goods as fresh.

Fraud is not limited to high-profile cases or luxury goods. Dairy products, spices, seafood, organic products, honey, and juice are all common targets.

Carvalho added that fragmented data systems are a significant Achilles' heel:

Many companies maintain their internal tracking systems, but these systems often lack interoperability with suppliers or customers. This leads to "information silos," hindering an overall end-to-end view of the supply chain.

Without shared, reliable data, fraudulent products can enter and move through the system undetected.

Blockchain technology can serve as an antidote to this increasingly severe crisis. However, Louie warns that blockchain-based accounting attempts also face numerous challenges.

In the more than 10 years since Ethereum's launch, we have yet to witness any true disruption, Louie cautioned. One reason the promise of blockchain in supply chains remains largely unfulfilled is that early adopters oversimplified the problem.

The core principles of blockchain technology can create a more transparent and trustworthy system. Decentralization ensures that no single entity controls the data, while immutability guarantees that data, once recorded, cannot be altered or deleted.

The benefits go beyond that. Selective transparency allows relevant stakeholders to share pertinent information without exposing sensitive business data. Meanwhile, smart contracts can automate processes and enforce agreements.

Ultimately, cryptographic techniques ensure the integrity and security of the ledger. Additionally, the integration of IoT sensors with blockchain can create immutable audit trails of environmental conditions, which are crucial for cold chain integrity.

Real-world implementations are beginning to yield results. Walmart has partnered with IBM to track pork in China and mangoes in the U.S., reducing tracking time from days to seconds. TE-Food and Provenance offer blockchain-based traceability solutions that enhance food safety and transparency. Large food companies like Nestlé and Carrefour, as well as platforms like Seafood Souq, are exploring blockchain to enhance supply chain transparency.

Louie emphasized the paradigm shift:

Traditional food supply chains rely on trusted intermediaries, depending on paper documents, third-party certifications, and the commitments of various participants along the chain. In contrast, blockchain shifts to a system based on verifiable data.

Carvalho explained the deterrent effect:

A well-implemented blockchain system can serve as a strong deterrent, as increased visibility and auditability make the risks of fraudulent activities higher and easier to expose.

Despite the promise of blockchain, it is not a panacea. Scalability, cost, interoperability with legacy systems, and integration pose significant barriers to adoption.

The "garbage in, garbage out" problem remains a fundamental limitation. Blockchain can only ensure the integrity of data once it is on the chain but cannot be responsible for the accuracy of data entering the chain.

Oracles and IoT devices that input external data into the blockchain are susceptible to tampering and technical failures. Manual data entry is also prone to errors or manipulation. Perfect traceability records cannot prevent compromised oracles from providing false data or colluding parties from inputting fraudulent details at the source.

Privacy concerns, regulatory uncertainties, and stakeholder adoption are additional obstacles. The food supply chain involves sensitive data that companies are reluctant to expose.

Permissioned blockchains and selective transparency offer solutions. However, these require careful governance and clear data access protocols. Regulatory frameworks are evolving, and broad stakeholder engagement is crucial for success.

Louie advocates for a pragmatic approach:

Start with clearly defined use cases where blockchain can provide obvious value, rather than attempting broad, unfocused implementations. Strong governance models are essential, especially for consortium blockchains.

Carvalho emphasized the need for industry standards, training, and collaboration:

Relying solely on technology is not enough. Success depends on redesigning underlying business processes, investing in training and change management, and fostering a culture of collaboration and data sharing.

The integration of blockchain with IoT, artificial intelligence, and other innovations offers a promising path. IoT sensors provide real-time data on product journeys, creating tamper-proof records.

AI algorithms analyze large datasets to detect anomalies and optimize logistics. Rapid testing methods, smart packaging, robotics, and digital certificates further enhance food integrity.

The infrastructure built to combat fraud brings broader benefits, including improved operational efficiency, reduced food waste, and verified sustainability claims.

Blockchain and its complementary technologies are becoming attractive even to companies less affected by fraud. Pilot projects are providing valuable lessons. Industry alliances are forming, and standards are beginning to emerge.

Potential returns extend beyond reducing fraud to include enhanced food safety, reduced waste, increased consumer confidence, and the creation of a more sustainable, equitable, and resilient global food system.

The intangible bite of food fraud may be pervasive, but it is not insurmountable. If thoughtfully deployed and integrated, blockchain could become the trust layer that ultimately resolves the $50 billion food fraud issue.

Related: Nvidia is pushing "physical AI," but DePAI is the right path

Original article: “Blockchain Can End the Food Fraud Crisis, but It’s a Costly Battle”

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。