I am not that pessimistic. I believe that "light" and "darkness" are not determined by certain people, but by laws.

If you lived during the Shang Dynasty, the European Middle Ages, or before the liberation of Tibet, and you were not part of the ruling class, then from today's perspective, you would certainly be in "darkness." However, the eventual transformation of these places into "light" was not due to the benevolence of the ruling class, but because light aligns more with the demands of productivity.

Similarly, although there are conspiracy groups with century-long ambitions today, I have never felt that they can truly achieve their goals unless there is a drastic change in the world's productivity.

Even with the emergence of robots, I see it as just one possibility. I believe the future is abundant rather than scarce. In an abundant future, "humans" are very valuable, or to put it more bluntly, the "human-shaped learning machines" that have evolved over hundreds of millions of years are valuable, and they are unlikely to be replaced by machines that have only evolved for a few decades.

To give a simple example, can the car you drive repair itself if it gets damaged? No, it cannot. But humans can.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。