Written by: Oliver, Mars Finance

Recently, CNBC confirmed that stablecoin giant Circle has officially applied to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish a national trust bank. This news was initially reported by Reuters and immediately triggered a positive market reaction, with Circle's stock price rising by 1% in after-hours trading. This is not an isolated compliance action, but rather a carefully planned strategic move in the context of its successful IPO, a 484% surge in stock price in June, and the Senate's passage of the GENIUS Act, which has brought about optimistic sentiment.

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire emphasized in a statement: "Establishing this national digital currency trust bank marks an important step towards our goal of building a transparent, efficient, and convenient internet financial system." This move is far from simple; it is a key to understanding Circle's future strategy and the regulatory endgame of the entire stablecoin industry.

What is a National Trust Bank? A "Special" Bank License

First, we need to understand that Circle is not pursuing a comprehensive commercial bank license that we are familiar with in our daily lives. The "First National Digital Currency Bank (N.A.)" it is applying to establish can be understood as a "functionally specialized" federal-level bank license. Its uniqueness lies in the precise delineation of its powers and limitations.

Core Power: Becoming a "Qualified Custodian"

The core value of this license lies in its granting of legal status to the licensed institution as a "Qualified Custodian." According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), investment advisors managing client assets above a certain threshold must store these assets with a "Qualified Custodian." In the past, this typically referred to traditional banks.

The OCC has clearly explained that institutions obtaining a national trust bank license are authorized to custody various digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, for clients. This means that once Circle is approved, it can legitimately provide custody services for institutional investors such as pension funds, hedge funds, and asset management companies, which manage trillions in assets, for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and potentially tokenized assets like stocks and bonds represented on the blockchain in the future. This is an indispensable legal prerequisite for institutional funds to enter the crypto world on a large scale and in compliance.

Core Limitation: No Deposits, No Loans

Unlike traditional banks, national trust banks are strictly prohibited from engaging in two core banking activities: accepting public deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and issuing loans.

This may seem like a "castration" of functions, but for Circle, it is a sought-after "advantage." Because of these restrictions, national trust banks can be exempt from a series of more stringent and complex regulatory frameworks aimed at traditional banks, such as the Bank Holding Company Act. This allows Circle to enter the realm of federal-level regulation in a more agile and focused manner, gaining the title of "bank" without bearing the full burden of traditional banking.

In short, this license is like a precisely calculated and polished "scalpel," accurately cutting out the functionality that Circle needs most—institutional-level custody qualifications—while eliminating unnecessary complex operations and the accompanying heavy regulatory burden.

Behind the Application: Circle's "Three Birds with One Stone" Strategy

Understanding what a national trust bank is allows us to see the interconnected strategic intentions behind Circle's actions more clearly. This is not a single-purpose action, but a "three birds with one stone" strategy that can achieve at least three core objectives.

First Intention: Strategic Defense, Paving the Way to Bid Farewell to the "SVB Ghost"

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in March 2023 was one of the most shocking moments in Circle's and the entire stablecoin history. At that time, Circle had $3.3 billion in USDC cash reserves at SVB, which caused its stablecoin USDC to temporarily decouple from the dollar, leading to a sudden collapse of market confidence and nearly resulting in a systemic risk.

This crisis exposed a fatal weakness in Circle's operating model: the safety of its reserves was highly dependent on the stability of third-party traditional banks. Applying for a national trust bank license is aimed at fundamentally addressing this potential risk. Although Circle has stated that it currently does not plan to change its management of USDC reserves held by other major banks, obtaining this license means it will have the ability to custody its own reserves in the future. This potential for "vertical integration" is a key step in completely dispelling the "SVB ghost" and ensuring the long-term safety of the USDC infrastructure.

Second Intention: Business Offensive, Opening the Trillion-Dollar Custody Market

If ensuring the safety of reserves is a defensive move, then opening new business lines is a proactive offense. Currently, Circle's revenue heavily relies on the interest generated from its dollar reserves, a model that is greatly affected by the macro interest rate environment and has its profit margins squeezed by high commission agreements with distribution channels like Coinbase.

Obtaining a custody license will open a door to a new business landscape for Circle. It will no longer be just a stablecoin issuer but can officially transform into a "digital asset infrastructure provider" for all institutions. Its client base will far exceed USDC users, extending to all financial institutions wishing to securely store digital assets. This is a service-oriented business with higher profit margins, stronger customer stickiness, and a market size reaching trillions of dollars. This not only creates a powerful second growth engine for Circle, effectively hedging the risks of its existing business, but also enhances its position in the financial value chain.

Third Intention: Regulatory Endgame, "Pre-compliance" Before Rule-Making

This is the most far-reaching and forward-looking consideration behind Circle's actions. It is a form of "pre-compliance" with future regulatory frameworks.

Currently, the U.S. Congress is actively advancing legislation known as the "Establishing and Guiding National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act" (referred to as the "GENIUS Act"). Having a federally regulated trust charter will greatly assist Circle in meeting the stringent requirements for "qualified issuers" set forth in the GENIUS Act.

Circle's application to become a national trust bank regulated by the OCC is precisely to align perfectly with the future legal definitions. As Allaire stated, this move is "in compliance with the new regulations on issuing and operating dollar-denominated stablecoins in the U.S." and believes it "can enhance the coverage and resilience of the dollar." It is foreseeable that when the GENIUS Act is officially passed, Circle, which has already completed its "banking" transformation and whose operating model fully complies with the requirements of the act, will be the only player that can "seamlessly connect" with almost no adjustments.

This move not only allows Circle to take a significant lead in the compliance race but, more importantly, it will build a deep "regulatory moat." The high threshold for a federal bank license is sufficient to keep the vast majority of potential competitors at bay, especially its biggest competitor—Tether (USDT), which has long operated in a regulatory gray area. At that time, the stablecoin market is likely to see a significant shift: "compliant stablecoins" represented by USDC will dominate institutional business in the U.S. and other mainstream financial markets, while USDT and others may be further squeezed into offshore markets where regulation is still unclear.

In summary, Circle's application for a national trust bank license is an extremely clever strategic layout. It achieves threefold objectives of risk defense, business expansion, and winning the regulatory endgame through what appears to be a simple compliance action. This marks its acceleration from an innovator in the crypto world to a federally regulated financial institution deeply integrated into and attempting to lead the future financial infrastructure. This step will not only determine Circle's own fate but will also significantly shape the competitive landscape of the global stablecoin market over the next decade.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。