After yesterday's article was published, many readers in the comments section asked me how I feel about the Vader project.

Vader is probably one of the most exposed AI Agents in the Virtual ecosystem. Not to mention anything else, just the Yapping it conducts attracts a lot of participants' attention every day.

I hold it, but I have not participated in its Yapping activities at all, so I am not very clear about the gameplay involved.

Some time ago, it launched a project rating activity. I really liked that rating and almost checked it every day.

I have written in my article that I only consider its rating as a reference and will not use it 100% as my own judgment standard for participating in projects.

I do not fully agree with its rating results, but I greatly appreciate some of the viewpoints it expressed during the rating process.

Regardless of how its rating turns out, having such reference information is actually quite rare for many participants.

However, when it first initiated the rating, I was quite worried for it. Because I could guess that the outcome of this rating would not be very good.

There must be a portion of people in the community who will use its rating as the standard for their project participation. Once the projects they participate in deviate significantly from their expectations, they will not first reflect on where their thinking went wrong, nor will they introspect on their responsibility as adults for their actions, but will instead blame the outcome on the project rating.

Can Vader withstand such pressure and continue on?

Sure enough, not long after, the Vader project team could not bear the pressure and terminated the rating activity.

Since the cancellation of the rating, it seems that the project team has shifted its focus to Yapping.

In my view, the actual significance of Yapping is far less than that of the rating. Because while ratings are difficult and not easy to conduct, they are a genuine need for users. The current Yapping, on the other hand, is purely market marketing without any actual business support; it does not address users' genuine needs.

Therefore, the current situation of Vader is that it has not solved any genuine needs and has not produced services and products that can actually meet user needs.

Comparing Vader with Mamo and the video project I mentioned earlier makes it clear: the latter two either directly provide value-added services to users or directly meet users' "emotional" needs.

Thus, the development of this project to its current state feels rather mediocre to me.

However, the project team recently claimed to be integrating ACP, hoping to provide users with a one-stop automated service from rating, collateral to investment in the future.

We will have to wait and see what this vision and its effects will be.

Some readers also asked what the danger would be if Virtual does not produce AI Agents that can truly meet genuine needs in a few months.

The danger I refer to primarily means that the popularity and heat gathered in the entire ecosystem will dissipate.

Once the popularity and heat dissipate, its attractiveness to developers and participants will decline, and this decline will make it very difficult to nurture new good projects. Without a continuous influx of new projects to supplement this ecosystem, its development will gradually wither.

This withering will ultimately reflect on the coin price, dragging it down.

During this time, compared to Virtual, it seems that Creator.bid is gaining more momentum, with many online KOLs turning to the latter's ecosystem to mine for profits.

Creator.bid's current highlight is that it has made significant improvements in project launches, hoping to filter out poor projects as much as possible through reviews.

This intention is good, but this method can at most filter out poor projects and cannot select good projects.

In my view, the most critical aspect of the development of the AI + Crypto ecosystem right now is the need for good projects that can solve genuine needs, where users are willing to pay real money for services/products from AI Agents.

Without such good projects, even if there is no project that runs away, leaving behind a bunch of projects that seem to be "working hard" but actually do not solve any problems in the ecosystem is meaningless.

So in the short term, I appreciate the Creator.bid team's dedication and effort, but in the long term, it faces the same potential problems as Virtual:

When will we see a batch of AI Agents that can generate profits and real income?

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。