Cryptocurrency’s durability continues to challenge critics, including leading economists who once doubted its staying power. Kenneth Rogoff, Maurits C. Boas Professor at Harvard University and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), reflected on Aug. 19 through social media platform X that his widely cited 2018 forecast had underestimated bitcoin’s trajectory.
“Almost a decade ago, I was the Harvard economist that said that bitcoin was more likely to be worth $100 than $100K,” he wrote, acknowledging that assumptions underpinning his outlook proved inaccurate. In reassessing his position, Rogoff highlighted three factors he failed to anticipate. He first pointed to weak regulatory resolve:
What did I miss? I was far too optimistic about the US coming to its senses about sensible cryptocurrency regulation; why would policymakers want to facilitate tax evasion and illegal activities?
He also cited bitcoin’s role in unregulated finance: “Second, I did not appreciate how bitcoin would compete with fiat currencies to serve as the transactions medium of choice in the twenty-trillion dollar global underground economy. This demand puts a floor on its price, as I discuss at length in my new book Our Dollar, Your Problem.”
At the time of his comments, bitcoin was trading near $113,500 after reaching a record high of about $124,500 in August. The price has since retreated, with analysts describing the move as consolidation amid market unease.
The Harvard professor’s final concern focused on conflicts of interest:
Third, I did not anticipate a situation where regulators, and especially the regulator in chief, would be able to brazenly hold hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars in cryptocurrencies seemingly without consequence given the blatant conflict of interest.
Despite Rogoff’s skepticism, the policy backdrop in the United States is evolving. The current administration has set out to position the U.S. as a global crypto hub, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) “Project Crypto” aimed at modernizing digital asset oversight, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) “Crypto Sprint” designed to accelerate regulatory clarity. The Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have also adopted more permissive positions, signaling a shift from restrictive policies toward institutional adoption and innovation-focused frameworks.
免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。