"Every time we hear 'this time is different,' the cycle ultimately proves 'there is no difference.'"

Every four years, the Bitcoin market follows an extremely consistent rhythm, shaped by a native code of Bitcoin: the halving of mining rewards. Approximately every 210,000 blocks, the network halves the mining rewards, thereby slowing down supply (deflation).

Historically, each halving has led to the same sequence: accumulation → parabolic rise → speculative peak → crash and recovery.

● 2012–2014: The first halving initiated Bitcoin's earliest true bull market, pushing the price from double digits to over $1,000, with the subsequent collapse of Mt. Gox marking the first major bear market.

● 2016–2018: The second halving led to the 2017 super frenzy and the ICO bubble, followed by the 2018 bear market triggered by regulatory crackdowns in China and rampant token issuance (projects crazily cashing out).

● 2020–2022: The third halving opened the "institutional era" of cryptocurrency—entry of MicroStrategy, Tesla, and ETFs—and peaked in 2021. This was followed by the 2022 crash, driven by the cascading failures of LUNA, Three Arrows Capital (3AC), and FTX.

● 2024 to present: The most recent halving occurred on April 19, 2024, reducing the block reward to 3.125 BTC. We are currently in the middle of the fourth cycle.

The repetition of this pattern is so precise that some analysts estimate that market peaks typically occur within 12-18 months after each halving, around the midpoint of the 4-year cycle.

We believe this cyclical repetition stems from Bitcoin's native logic and the characteristics of the cryptocurrency industry:

We've long heard 'this time is different'—that unfulfilled 'super cycle'

If the claim that "the cycle is dead" sounds familiar, it's because we've experienced it before.

During the bull market of 2020-2021, the crypto industry collectively promoted the so-called super cycle argument—that Bitcoin and various leading cryptocurrencies had matured, shedding their "boom and bust" nature, and we would see "only up" (up only). The protocol advancements in blockchain technology, along with unprecedented liquidity from sectors like NFTs, GameFi, and DeFi, seemed to prove that "this time is different."

This argument seemed reasonable at the time. Tesla added Bitcoin to its balance sheet, Musk promoted Dogecoin (DOGE) on live television, and "diamond hands" became a badge of pride as retail investors made money. DeFi and NFTs were rewriting the rules of on-chain finance. Many KOLs predicted that with so many new players and applications, Bitcoin and even leading altcoins would no longer suffer the kind of 70% level drawdowns seen in the past.

But the "super cycle" ultimately could not sustain itself due to overheating. What followed was a brutal reminder, revealing the deep-rooted nature of crypto cycles: the death spiral of LUNA/UST, the liquidation of Three Arrows Capital, and the bankruptcy of FTX wiped out hundreds of billions in market value, with Bitcoin itself plummeting nearly 80% from its peak.

Today, a more subtle form of similar optimism has returned; with spot ETFs, institutional inflows, and deeper liquidity, the market seems to have finally escaped the "boom-bust" rhythm. But history rarely exits so easily. The kind of confidence seen at the peak in 2021 is echoing once again.

Why cycles still exist—The structural logic of cryptocurrency

Even with ETF inflows and Wall Street infrastructure, cryptocurrency is inherently a deeply cyclical industry.

The expansion mechanism of cryptocurrency makes it inevitable. When market sentiment turns bullish, new coins (meme coins) emerge overnight, projects easily raise millions, and liquidity floods into perpetual contracts and leverage. This explosive growth in issuance and leverage drives prices up—until it can no longer be pushed.

The perpetual contract trading volume dominates, meaning price action is not only constrained by real demand but also by liquidation mechanisms. High leverage makes price surges seem effortless, while crashes can be catastrophic. The industry's reflexivity—where narratives drive prices and prices feed back into narratives—ensures overextension in the market.

Ultimately, new token supply (unlocking/inflation), dilution of attention, and fatigue from excessive leverage will erode momentum. When the last buyer disappears, the structural features that built the uptrend will begin to reverse. This built-in feedback loop ensures that cryptocurrency cannot escape cycles—it is a manifestation of cycles itself.

Current Bitcoin—Underperforming mainstream assets and hidden cracks

We believe the cycle is still at work, with an "invisible hand" behind price action for the following reasons: despite positive news such as the approval of spot ETFs in 2025, institutional inflows, and record highs in gold and stock prices, Bitcoin has underperformed nearly all other major assets. The only reasonable explanation seems to be Bitcoin's 4-year cycle.

● Driven by easing global liquidity and inflation concerns, stock markets in the U.S., China, South Korea, and Japan have risen about 20-30% year-to-date (YTD).

● Gold has repeatedly set historical highs, rising 50% year-to-date, solidifying its status as a safe haven.

● In contrast, Bitcoin has only risen about 9% year-to-date, still failing to break above its 2021 highs.

If the cycle had truly ended, Bitcoin should have led this "risk-on" environment rather than lagging behind. Its relative weakness suggests we are approaching the final stages of the cycle—cooling and recovery. Further evidence is that the crypto ecosystem is again showing internal "cracks," signaling a deep correction that belongs solely to the crypto market.

From October 10 to 11, 2025, the crypto market experienced the largest liquidation cascade in history, wiping out nearly $19 billion in leveraged positions within 24 hours. Market makers and prop desks were forced to unwind, triggering a comprehensive flash crash in altcoins. Weeks later, Stream Finance, a DeFi protocol with a TVL (Total Value Locked) that once reached hundreds of millions, disclosed a loss of $93 million, froze withdrawals, and its xUSD stablecoin subsequently crashed by over 70%.

These are not macro shocks. They are crypto-native fractures, surfacing precisely when leverage, complacency, and cyclical fatigue converge—just like in past cycles.

The cycle will continue—An unpopular perspective

We suggest traders consider an alternative viewpoint: what if the established crypto cycle is still valid?

Each halving remains significant. Each bull market still tends toward excess. Each crash still provides a reset (washout). Bitcoin's recent performance and the re-emergence of structural fractures may not be anomalies—they may precisely confirm that the underlying rhythm is intact.

Whether the next explosive surge occurs in six months or a year, the same internal logic may still guide it. And when the market once again insists "this time is different," historical cycles may quietly and predictably provide a strong counterargument.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。