The XRP decentralization debate heated up again, as it does once in a while, after Ethereum supporters claimed the XRPL network is centralized because it runs on 134 permissioned validators. 

To support the argument, a screenshot from XRPL.org was included, and this one suggests that XRP's validator structure is "proof of control."

Of course, the claim got the XRP community riled up, with people pointing out that Ripple and XRP are different - and that validator count alone is not the same as centralization. 

This is not a valid argument.https://t.co/10BEqR29WD

But the main response came from David Schwartz, former CTO of Ripple and co-architect of the XRP Ledger. Still, instead of drafting a new reply, he just reposted his explanation from September 2023, calling the new claims invalid.

It is all about how validators on XRPL do not really have the power that a lot of people think they do. Every node on the network can check transactions, rules and the ledger state on its own. Validators do not approve or reject individual transactions the way miners or stakers do on other chains.

Coordination, not centralization

The only thing validators decide is which of two conflicting but valid transactions to include - basically, solving the double-spend problem. They cannot force changes or push through upgrades. 

Even new features on XRPL need broad support from nodes, not just validators.

You Might Also Like
Fri, 01/23/2026 - 05:33 Turkish Banking Giant Extends Ripple PartnershipByAlex Dovbnya

Thus, just because validators are permissioned does not mean they control the network. If anything, XRPL's design limits their influence. The bottom line is that it is not governance for XRP; it iscoordination, and no one gets to override the system’s rules.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。