This week in East 8 Time, ETH broke below $2800, plunging like a heavy hammer onto the already highly leveraged long positions, triggering widespread passive deleveraging and chain liquidations. On-chain data shows that from individual large holders to institutional funds, various high-beta participants were almost simultaneously under pressure, with market sentiment shifting from "buying the dip" to "cutting losses to survive" within hours. Meanwhile, gold saw a maximum single-day drop of over 4% and silver nearly 6%, causing traditional safe-haven assets and high-risk assets to resonate and decline simultaneously, amplifying the dramatic re-pricing of global risk appetite. This article will focus on the position changes and risk exposures of several typical large holders and institutions, dissecting the internal logic of this systemic leverage stress test from their choices.
ETH Plunges: The Long Wall Crumbles
● Timeline and Emotional Shift: As ETH fell towards $2800, the market was initially filled with optimistic sentiment of "buying the dip." Leveraged longs chose to withstand the pullback. However, once the key price level was breached, stop-losses, position reductions, and passive liquidations were triggered almost simultaneously, with sentiment shifting from "healthy correction" to "risk aversion first," turning the dense trading area into a concentrated selling pressure zone.
● Concentrated Liquidation Chain: After the price fell below the critical range, high-leverage longs relying on futures and lending platforms began to trigger concentrated liquidations and margin calls. Some accounts chose to urgently add margin in an attempt to maintain their positions, but more leveraged positions were already close to the system's forced liquidation line, leading to a flood of passive liquidation orders in a short time, further accelerating the decline in spot and contract prices, creating a self-reinforcing loop of "price drop—passive selling—price drop again."
● Funding Rates and Liquidation Sidewriting Crowded: From the futures funding rates and liquidation data, it is evident that the previous long positions were significantly crowded, with funding rates long biased and leverage multiples widely increased, laying the groundwork for this round of sell-off. At the moment of concentrated liquidation, the scale and density of forced liquidation orders suddenly expanded, reflecting that high-leverage funds were highly homogenized in the same range, making it difficult to disperse risk once triggered.
● Not a Black Swan but Exposed Weaknesses: From the intra-day volatility rhythm, this appears more like a concentrated release of long-accumulated weaknesses rather than an unanticipated "black swan." Previously, high-leverage longs had been stacking up against a backdrop of macro uncertainty, geopolitical tensions, and tightening liquidity. Once the price faced any adverse movement, it naturally evolved into a chain deleveraging event, exposing structural issues rather than a single accident.
The Liquidation of Whale 0x46e3: …
● High-Leverage Preference Whale Profile: Address 0x46e3 has long demonstrated a typical high-leverage trading preference on-chain, frequently using collateralized lending and derivatives to amplify position returns, showing a strong betting inertia on trends. Such whales can easily amplify profits in favorable market conditions but expose structural flaws in rapidly reducing leverage during pullbacks, becoming "amplifiers" during market volatility.
● Details of 2700 GOLD Liquidation: According to a single source, 0x46e3 was liquidated for approximately 2700 GOLD, amounting to about $13.83 million during this round of volatility, corresponding to the concentrated explosion point of its high-leverage collateral structure during severe adjustments. While this figure should be viewed cautiously, it sufficiently indicates that it was not a minor pullback but rather a significant passive deleveraging impact.
● Transfer Path Exposes Risk Control Breakpoints: From the on-chain transfer path and collateral asset structure, it can be seen that this address exhibited tense asset scheduling and collateral repurposing behaviors before and after the crash, attempting to delay liquidation time through additional collateral and minor position reductions. However, the cross-collateralization of multiple assets and high concentration exposed its risk management space, which was greatly compressed. Once the price slipped out of the expected range, the originally meticulous "rolling adjustment" instantly failed.
● How a Single Whale Amplifies Impact: For large holders like 0x46e3, once forced to deleverage on a large scale, it is not just an individual loss issue. The concentrated selling pressure generated by liquidation directly impacts the prices of related assets. Other large holders and quantitative funds, upon detecting the abnormal movements of the whale, will adjust their own positions and risk control parameters, leading to a broader range of position reductions, stop-losses, and capital withdrawals, quickly amplifying market shocks on-chain.
Individual Large Holders Suffer Consecutively: Huang Licheng…
● Huang Licheng's Position Loss and Emotional Symbol: According to a single source, the well-known on-chain address Huang Licheng suffered a daily loss of about $2 million during this crash window, with his holdings primarily in high-volatility assets and frequent short-term trading. This loss scale not only reflects a numerical change in an individual account but has also been amplified in social media and community discourse as an emotional symbol of "celebrity longs being thwarted," reinforcing retail investors' intuitive perception of market risk.
● BTC Whale's Motivation for Selling 200 BTC: Also according to a single source, a BTC whale sold 200 BTC, valued at about $16.91 million, during the intense volatility. This action appears more like a proactive stop-loss or strategic position reduction after risk exposure. Unlike passive liquidations, such sales are usually based on a reassessment of future price volatility ranges and liquidity defense considerations, reflecting that some large holders choose to "preserve cash first, then watch the trend."
● Passive Beating vs. Proactive Position Reduction: In the same round of crash, some large holders like 0x46e3 were passively beaten until the liquidation line was triggered, leading to forced selling by the system; others chose to proactively reduce positions before key price levels to control loss ranges. While both paths may yield similarly poor results on paper, their impact on subsequent survival space and reallocation ability is significant, exposing the dividing line of "whether to actively manage risk."
● Well-Known Address Amplifies Retail Panic: The floating losses or stop-loss actions of these widely tracked well-known addresses are quickly relayed by data platforms and social media, forming a collective narrative of "even large holders can't withstand it." For retail investors, who face highly asymmetric information, this narrative often has a more significant impact than candlestick charts, prompting them to choose to cut losses at emotional peaks, further amplifying selling pressure in price bottom areas.
Institutional Long Funds Face Backlash: T…
● Yi Lihua and Trend Research's High-Beta Style: In this round of events, Yi Lihua and his Trend Research have drawn significant attention due to their long-standing high-beta, aggressive trading style. Trend Research is known for actively participating in mainstream assets and popular sectors with leveraged strategies, often choosing to increase exposure when trends are clear, regarded as a typical representative of "institutional long funds."
● High-Leverage Strategies Under Pressure in This Round of Volatility: Although there is currently a lack of specific position data from Trend Research, the backdrop of ETH breaking below $2800 and triggering widespread liquidations almost guarantees that high-leverage long strategies will be under pressure. Whether through derivatives to amplify longs or through lending to increase spot holdings, such structures will face multiple pressures of margin calls, passive position reductions, and even forced liquidations during severe pullbacks.
● Prohibition on Speculating Position and Liquidation Details: It is essential to emphasize that the specific numbers regarding Trend Research's ETH position size, entry cost, and "liquidation price" in the market are mostly unverified speculations. According to research briefing requirements, related information must not be speculated; we can only judge based on public clues that there is a significant long risk exposure, but we cannot and should not provide precise leverage multiples or liquidation ranges to avoid misleading narratives.
● The Paradox of Higher Leverage After Professionalization: The situation of institutional long funds like Trend Research reflects a sharp paradox in the crypto industry: so-called "professionalization" and "institutionalization" often mean more complex leverage tools and higher capital efficiency, but they also inadvertently raise the overall leverage level of the system. Once the market reverses, the pressure is not only on individual projects or retail investors but also on "professional players" deeply involved in derivatives and lending agreements, making the entire market more susceptible to concentrated targeting during extreme conditions.
Gold and Silver Drop Together: Global Risk Aversion Chain…
● Data Background of Precious Metals' Single-Day Plunge: According to a single source, during the same macro window as ETH's crash, spot gold saw a maximum single-day drop of over 4%, and silver's drop approached 6%, which is a rare severe correction in the traditional precious metals market. Historically, gold and silver have often been viewed as defensive assets during turbulent times, and this simultaneous "loss of ground" highlights that traditional safe-haven logic is itself undergoing re-pricing.
● Stage High Point Views and Crypto Pullback Resonance: Spartan Capital Securities analyst Peter Cardillo pointed out, "The pullback in gold and silver futures may indicate that prices have reached recent highs." This judgment resonates with the collective pullback of crypto assets like ETH: as funds begin to question the further upside potential of precious metals, their tolerance for high-risk assets also declines, leading to a systematic compression of overall risk appetite.
● Geopolitical Tensions Fail to Support Gold: Against the backdrop of the recent increase in U.S. Navy military forces in the Middle East (according to a single source), gold should theoretically receive more safe-haven buying support, but the reality is a significant price pullback. This abnormal performance of "bad news no longer benefiting gold" indicates that the market is re-pricing the transmission path of geopolitical risks to asset prices, and the traditional logic of "war = gold up" is failing.
● Emotional Dislocation Between Safe-Haven Assets and ETH: When gold, silver, and assets like ETH all drop within the same time window, it indicates that funds are not simply migrating from high-risk assets to safe-haven assets but are engaging in a broader "risk asset withdrawal" behavior. The price pressure on high-volatility assets like ETH, combined with traditional safe-haven assets failing to provide a stable anchor, leads market participants into a dislocated emotional state of "nowhere to hide," further amplifying the overall contraction of leverage exposure.
Lessons from the High-Leverage Era: Next Time…
During this round of ETH's crash, from on-chain whales like 0x46e3 to individual large holders like Huang Licheng, and to institutional long funds like Trend Research, a common weakness has been collectively exposed: under high leverage and high correlation structures, any severe volatility of a single asset can quickly evolve into systemic fragility. The passive deleveraging of whales, the floating losses of celebrity addresses, and the pressure on institutional strategies combine to form a real-life "stress test," reminding the market that the current risk-bearing capacity is far less robust than the apparent prosperity suggests.
In today's environment of cross-collateralization, on-chain leverage, and intertwined derivatives, the price pullback of ETH, a core asset, is no longer just a matter of "how much a single coin has dropped," but how it can be amplified into a multi-chain reaction through high leverage, automatic liquidation, and multi-asset interactions. Each time a critical price level is pierced downwards, it may trigger a chain reaction of collateral asset value shrinkage, insufficient margin, and systemic position reductions, ultimately forming a collective liquidation waterfall.
Looking ahead, against the backdrop of macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical tensions, and fluctuating liquidity cycles, high-leverage strategies will continue to be frequently "named." Whether institutional or individual, anyone choosing to stand on the leverage highway must accept the reality of being thrown out of the vehicle by the market's sudden brakes at any time. The next similar event may not come with much advance warning, only to be instantaneously detonated at a critical price level.
For large holders, the core insight from this round of market activity is that even with ample funds and professional teams, excessive concentrated allocations and cross-collateralization can still amplify losses in extreme market conditions. Setting absolute leverage limits in advance and controlling the correlation exposure between assets is more critical than adding margin after the fact. For ordinary investors, a more important lesson is not to be swept away by the narrative of prosperity and celebrity aura; moderately reducing leverage and diversifying risk during the peak of a bull market is more realistic than attempting to "go all in" on every dip; true security comes from position structure, not market direction.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
