This week, the cryptocurrency market experienced a rapid decline in Eastern Eight Time Zone. Amidst the violent fluctuations of Bitcoin and Ethereum, several leading whales faced large-scale liquidations and forced sell-offs simultaneously. On-chain monitoring data shows that a Bitcoin whale sold off 200 BTC at once, well-known artist "Brother Ma Ji" Huang Li Cheng suffered a daily loss of about $2 million, and gold bulls were forcibly liquidated 2700 GOLD. These figures combined created a strong shockwave. These large accounts, previously regarded as "smart money," also exposed risks such as excessive leverage, heavy positions, and distorted liquidity assessments during extreme market conditions. The market began to reassess: when even the whales cannot hold on, how much value remains in the previously mythologized risk control halo.
Perspective Breakdown
● The Bitcoin whale's loss: On-chain data shows that a certain BTC whale sold 200 BTC during the price drop, cashing out about $16.91 million, with cumulative losses exceeding $8 million compared to the entry cost. This transaction reflects a typical psychological turning point from "holding the position and waiting for a rebound" to "panic selling," revealing how fragile high leverage and concentrated positions can be during extreme volatility.
● The contrast of celebrity long positions: According to HyperInsight monitoring, "Brother Ma Ji" Huang Li Cheng suffered a daily loss of about $2 million during this round of fluctuations, while still holding approximately 2500 ETH in long positions, with unrealized losses exceeding $430,000. This stands in stark contrast to his previous high-profile displays of profit, shaping the image of "celebrity whales creating wealth." The reality of his account exposes the gap between celebrity aura and actual risk control ability, raising doubts about the logic of "copying celebrities' homework."
● The gold bulls' downfall: Traditional safe-haven assets are also not safe. Lookonchain data indicates that a whale long on the gold token GOLD was forcibly liquidated 2700 GOLD, with a liquidation amount of about $13.83 million, suffering losses exceeding $270,000. This position clearly adopted a high-leverage, short-term trend betting approach, and in an environment where gold and silver futures significantly corrected, safe-haven assets instantly turned into high-risk minefields, making the phenomenon of cross-market whales stepping on mines particularly glaring.
● The myth of "smart money" shatters: Market voices bluntly state, "This round of market conditions has pushed the smart money that previously leveraged heavily on BTC and ETH into the spotlight." Whether anonymous whales or publicly identified celebrities and commodity bulls, they were ruthlessly liquidated during liquidity fractures due to excessive leverage, highly concentrated positions, and lack of effective hedging, reminding investors: so-called smart money does not mean it won't lose money, but rather is better at telling stories in bull markets.
Narrative Interweaving
● The resonance between on-chain whales and market sentiment: The Bitcoin whale's sale of 200 BTC in a short time not only locked in its cumulative loss of over $8 million but also left amplified panic signals on-chain. Once large sell-offs were captured in real-time by data platforms and spread to social media, panic sentiment quickly transmitted to other holders, forming a psychological anchor of "whale selling = market not over," which in turn triggered more passive reductions and follow-up sell-offs, amplifying the already fragile structural selling pressure in the market.
● The transmission of celebrity positions and social pressure: The details of Huang Li Cheng's ETH long position are not secret—approximately 2500 ETH, a daily loss of $2 million, and current unrealized losses still exceeding $430,000 have been repeatedly shared and interpreted by the community. Unlike ordinary whales, celebrity accounts face not only financial curves but also the scrutiny and pressure of social media, which can heighten the tendency to "stubbornly resist drawdowns and hold long positions," making rational stop-loss decisions more difficult and amplifying every operation, turning them into amplifiers of retail sentiment.
● The penetration of macro and micro risks: The forced liquidation of 2700 GOLD by gold bulls occurred almost simultaneously with the significant fluctuations of Bitcoin and Ethereum, reflecting the oscillation of macro narratives—while there are signs of easing risks of a U.S. government shutdown and Trump signaling "bipartisan cooperation," the U.S. military is increasing troops in the Middle East, and geopolitical tensions are rising, causing the market to oscillate between "risk aversion and risk-taking." Funds rapidly migrate between U.S. stocks, commodities, and cryptocurrencies, dragging down safe-haven assets like gold while exacerbating the pulse-like volatility in the crypto market.
● Liquidity exhaustion and liquidation waterfall: When BTC, ETH, and GOLD are simultaneously under pressure, it is challenging to find sufficiently deep counterparties for large positions in a short time, and the speed of reduction lags far behind the speed of price decline. Whether it is the BTC whale's sale of 200 BTC or the $13.83 million forced liquidation of gold bulls, both essentially represent a rapid slide from "controllable floating losses" to "irreversible chain reactions of liquidation" under the combined effects of plummeting liquidity and automatic liquidation mechanisms.
Deep Game
In this round of violent fluctuations, the collective failure of so-called "smart money" presents a highly similar path: relying on leverage to amplify returns, concentrating bets on a single asset or direction, accumulating considerable paper profits during favorable market conditions, and also building excessive confidence in their own judgments. When the macro environment suddenly changes and volatility sharply amplifies, positions lacking sufficient risk hedging are forced to run naked, with whales hoping for "just hold on a bit longer for a rebound," leading to delayed stop-losses, ultimately being disciplined by the exchange's liquidation engine. From the perspective of market structure, whales are not standing in opposition to retail investors; they are similarly trapped in the same set of chasing highs and cutting losses, emotion-driven game rules, only with larger chips, making the noise during liquidation even more piercing.
Layout Suggestions
In the future, the risk control framework of compliance and institutional funds is likely to continue to strengthen, imposing stricter requirements on leverage ratios, risk exposure, and liquidity management, and this trend will gradually transmit to the crypto field. The continuous liquidations and sell-offs of whales in this round provide retail investors with a very intuitive lesson: what truly matters is not how many BTC or ETH are held on-chain, but your own leverage boundaries, position management, and ability to withstand drawdowns. In the short term, as some whales passively exit or significantly reduce positions, market volatility may still be severe, but it also frees up a healthier chip structure for medium to long-term funds. For ordinary investors, rather than mythologizing "smart money" or blindly copying the betting directions of celebrities or whales, it is better to take this opportunity to establish clear position limits, single trade risk controls, and mandatory stop-loss rules, treating this series of liquidations as a living risk control textbook rather than a distant whale accident.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
