Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

The Day of One Billion Dollars: The Coming of Age of Bitcoin

CN
Odaily星球日报
Follow
5 hours ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

On March 28, 2013, at 5:15 AM GMT, the total market value of Bitcoin quietly surpassed 1 billion dollars. That day, the price of a single Bitcoin was about 91.25 dollars, with a circulation of approximately 10,958,700 coins.

The figure of 1 billion dollars itself is not astonishing. When Twitter went public in 2013, its market value was about 20 billion dollars, which is 20 times that. By the valuation of unicorn startups at the time, it would only be enough to buy half of Snapchat or a third of Uber. However, translated into another context, 1 billion dollars is equivalent to the entire GDP of Caribbean small countries like Grenada, Saint Kitts and Nevis for a year. A "digital currency" that had been born for just over four years had already reached an economic scale comparable to a sovereign nation.

The well-known media outlet Bitcoin Magazine included a statement in its report at the time, which may have gone unnoticed then but now seems very prescient: "If breaking 31 dollars in 2011 proved that Bitcoin was not dead, then today is the day it officially steps onto the mainstream stage."

March 2013: A Crazy Spring

So what happened in the spring of 2013? Why did the price surge from 40 dollars to over 90 dollars in just a few weeks, pushing the market value over the 1 billion dollar mark? It was believed at the time to be driven by two waves: one from panic in the Mediterranean, and the other from a green light in Washington.

The first wave came from Cyprus. As early as June 2012, this Mediterranean island nation had plunged into economic collapse due to excessive banking and a substantial holding of Greek bonds. The government was unable to rescue the banking sector and sought a bailout from the EU and the International Monetary Fund. In March 2013, the eurozone's bailout plan emerged but came with a chilling condition: a one-time tax on bank deposits. Deposits below 100,000 euros would be taxed at about 6.75%, and those above 100,000 euros would be taxed at 9.9%. This policy sparked intense public anger and panic. Although the plan was ultimately modified amidst widespread opposition, trust in fiat currency and the banking system began to erode. Ordinary people were in a panic: if the money in banks was no longer safe, where could we put our money?

Bitcoin thus entered the sight of Europeans in an unexpected way. Bloomberg's Businessweek even directly declared that it could become "the last safe haven of the global economy." The media no longer described it with esoteric technical terms but instead used more accessible terms: "digital gold," "alternative currency," "anarchic currency." These terms precisely captured the anxiety of the times; as people lost faith in traditional financial institutions, a form of money that required "no trust in anyone" suddenly became incredibly appealing. Hot money began to flow into cryptocurrencies, and even beyond Cyprus, Spain also showed signs of a surge in Bitcoin application downloads.

The second wave came from Washington across the ocean. In March 2013, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in the U.S. released guidance stating that ordinary Bitcoin users did not need to register as "money transmitters"; only exchanges did. Legal uncertainty had been the biggest barrier for companies adopting Bitcoin over the past two years. FinCEN's guidance acted as a reassurance for the market. At least in the U.S., holding and using Bitcoin itself was legal.

These two events, separated by half the globe, surged towards the same beach under the media's influence, pushing Bitcoin's price from 40 dollars to 92 dollars in just half a month, completely igniting market attention.

The Bet of Believers: A Prophecy of 100 Times

As early as August 2011, the man known as Bitcoin Jesus, Roger Ver, made a wild bet on Youtube. He wagered 10,000 dollars, claiming that Bitcoin would outperform gold, silver, and the stock market by 100 times within two years. At that time, Ver explained, "This means that if silver rises 100% in two years, then Bitcoin should rise 10,000%."

Ver made this bet because the Mt. Gox hacking incident in June 2011 and the ensuing aftermath caused Bitcoin's price to plummet from 31 dollars to below 2 dollars, leading to widespread doubt and criticism toward Bitcoin. As an early promoter and evangelist of Bitcoin, Ver initiated this bet to restore Bitcoin's reputation and boost community confidence.

By March 2013, the Dow Jones Index had risen from 11,372 in mid-2011 to 14,559, an increase of about 28%. According to Ver's bet calculations, Bitcoin needed to rise to 296 dollars to win. At that time, Bitcoin was only 92 dollars, still far from the target. But Ver didn't seem worried because he saw what ordinary people could not: the capital flowing into Bitcoin, the engineers building ASIC miners, and the programmers writing code for the community. To him, this was just the beginning.

On November 27, 2013, Bitcoin finally broke the thousand-dollar barrier, compared with the approximately 10 dollars when Ver made his bet, a 100 times increase. However, he ultimately lost; Bitcoin achieved a hundredfold growth in two years and three months, three months later than the two-year bet period. Ver did not go back on his word; he fulfilled his promise by donating 100 times his wager, 1 million dollars, to the Foundation for Economic Education (fee.org).

What won was Bitcoin, but the bet was lost. However, the phrase "everything is possible" indeed became the most accurate footnote for Bitcoin.

VC Awakens in This Spring

Before March 2013, Bitcoin remained on the fringes in the eyes of Silicon Valley venture capitalists, rarely regarded as a seriously investable asset class.

Ben Davenport was one of the first to change his viewpoint. He invested in BitPay, a Bitcoin payment processing company, in early 2013. His logic was simple: if Bitcoin could really become a means of payment, then someone would need to help merchants process those payments. This was an infrastructure-level opportunity. But what made him excited was not BitPay itself, but the logic behind the billion-dollar figure. He explained in an interview: "In the past, VCs looked at the Bitcoin business and only saw a market with a total value of 150 million, which was too small to warrant investment. But now it's different; the market cap has reached the billion-dollar level, and investing in a strong team becomes meaningful. I predict that within 12 to 18 months, the floodgates for VC funding will open."

This prediction was later proven to be quite accurate. From 2014 to 2015, VC investment in Bitcoin and the blockchain sector welcomed its first wave of peak. Names like Coinbase, Circle, and blockchain.com, which are now widely recognized, raised their first round of financing during that period.

The Growth Path of an Asset Class

Looking back from today's market value of over 2 trillion dollars, the figure of 1 billion dollars seems somewhat insignificant. However, what matters is not the scale itself, but the macro-level shift in the understanding of Bitcoin.

Prior to this, Bitcoin was more often seen as a marginal experiment, a technical toy in a geek community, and a speculative target characterized by high volatility and high risk. In the eyes of most people, it could not yet be considered an asset. But once it crossed this threshold for the first time, it entered a range large enough to be analyzed and "seen" by mainstream capital systems. A long-standing question since Bitcoin's birth, "Can a currency without a central bank and without state backing truly have real value?" was pushed back onto a broader stage after that spring.

Regulatory bodies began to think about how to regulate it, mainstream financial institutions began to study it seriously, and the media began to describe it using terms like "digital gold." In August 2013, Germany's Ministry of Finance became the first national government to recognize Bitcoin as "a unit of account." Three months later, the U.S. Senate held its first hearing on virtual currencies, and Bitcoin officially entered the agenda of policy and regulation. At that time, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke acknowledged in a letter that Bitcoin "has a long-term future." It was also then that the Winklevoss twins (now co-founders of Gemini) submitted the first Bitcoin ETF application to the U.S. SEC. Although this application was ultimately rejected, it opened the path to a decade-long ETF battle.

The evolution of technology, the influx of capital, the growth of users, the diffusion of narratives, and the gradual involvement of regulation transformed the entire ecosystem from a loose experiment into a structured market. These seemingly small steps that could lead to significant outcomes and small streams that could become rivers and seas can all be traced back to that spring.

The Leap of Computational Power

If a market value of 1 billion dollars represents a milestone in Bitcoin's value system, then on the hardware level, March 2013 was also a turning point for an era.

In the three years preceding it, Bitcoin mining experienced a rapid evolution: in 2009, everyone could mine Bitcoin using their ordinary laptops (CPU); by 2010, someone discovered that AMD's graphics cards (GPU) were dozens of times faster than CPUs for Bitcoin hashing calculations, and card prices began to soar; in 2011, FPGA mining emerged, which was more efficient than GPU but with a higher barrier to entry.

In early 2013, the first commercial ASIC miner, Avalon, was born. The first generation of Avalon miners had a computing power of about 60–70 GH/s. Although this seems trivial today, it was equivalent to the total of dozens of graphics cards at that time. Moreover, its power consumption was only 600W, far below the equivalent power of graphics card arrays.

However, the advent of ASICs brought not only a technological revolution but also a frenzied speculative wave. The price of Avalon miners at their January 2013 release was about 8,000 yuan. By April, when Bitcoin prices surged, this miner was speculated in the black market to over 300,000 yuan, a nearly 40-fold increase, even more extreme than Bitcoin's price increase during the same period. Even so, the miners were still sold out.

Computational power was driven up at a crazy pace in this hardware race. In March 2013, the total network computational power was in the range of 20 to 30 TH/s. By the end of the year, this number had increased over a hundredfold, entering the PH/s level.

Behind this astonishing iteration speed was the beginning of Bitcoin starting to break boundaries; more people began to believe in the Bitcoin narrative. Some may regard it as an asset, some as technology, and some as a speculative tool. However, regardless of the reason, money came in, and people came in. When more people entered, competition arose; with competition, some began to ponder how to mine faster and more efficiently than others. Thus, CPU evolved into GPU, GPU into FPGA, and FPGA into ASIC.

The ascent of market value attracted more participants, and more participants brought about fiercer competition, which in turn stimulated faster technological iteration. This, in turn, made the network more secure and more difficult to attack. When the network was secure enough, larger capital dared to enter, laying the foundation for the next round of market value ascent. The billion-dollar threshold was the starting point for this accelerating cycle.

The Fruits of Time, Unchanging Core

On March 28, 2013, the editors of Bitcoin Magazine wrote a passage while reporting Bitcoin's market value surpassing 1 billion dollars. This passage is still moving today: "Regardless of whether Bitcoin is 30 dollars or 300 dollars four months later, its core value has never changed: it allows you to send digital payments instantly, securely, and anonymously anywhere in the world, without needing any government, company, or bank, with almost negligible costs. This is the promise that Satoshi Nakamoto worked hard to deliver to us, and the promise that the entire community has always been striving to fulfill. Now that Bitcoin has reached 1 billion dollars, our task is simple: do not forget our true goal and keep moving forward."

Over a decade has passed, the price of Bitcoin has risen and fallen, been declared dead countless times, and time and again risen from the ashes. But in these cycles, its core value has always remained unchanged. No one can predict the future, but the belief in Bitcoin continues to this day.

Just like today in 2013.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

抢莫斯科门票,分5万刀!
广告
|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by Odaily星球日报

8 hours ago
Weekly Editor's Picks (March 21 - March 27)
9 hours ago
Odaily exclusive interview with SharpLink: Ethereum's "productive capitalist"
22 hours ago
The financial public chain Pharos Network announced a partnership with Circle to deploy USDC and CCTP on the mainnet, further building an inclusive global RealFi settlement layer.
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatar律动BlockBeats
4 hours ago
From Co-rental House Dispute to 300 Billion Showdown: WSJ's Long Article Reveals the Decade-long Private Grudge Between the Founders of Anthropic and OpenAI for the First Time.
avatar
avatarTechub News
5 hours ago
Contemporary version of "Why not eat meat porridge": Fang Limi, can you guess why I need to take out a loan to buy a house?
avatar
avatar律动BlockBeats
8 hours ago
a16z: The True Meaning of Strong Chain Quality, Blockchain Space Should Not Be Monopolized
avatar
avatarOdaily星球日报
8 hours ago
Weekly Editor's Picks (March 21 - March 27)
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink