Authored by: pixelpanda, Pharos Research

Abstract

In the continuous evolution of on-chain finance, the market's understanding of returns is undergoing profound changes. Recently, the industry has been more familiar with high-volatility return models driven by token incentives, trading activity, and market risk preferences; however, with changes in user demographics, market cycles, and asset allocation needs, more capital is starting to question a more fundamental issue: can the on-chain world provide return products connected to real assets, real cash flows, and real risk management logic? Around this proposition, RWA (Real World Assets) is moving from the conceptual phase of migrating assets on-chain to the practical phase of turning returns into products and products into allocation tools. The pAlpha fixed-income RWA Vault launched by Pharos is a concentrated embodiment of this transition at the product level, providing us with a valuable sample to observe the evolution of on-chain fixed income. In the face of market concerns that RWA fixed-income products will inevitably yield atypical returns, we must penetrate the surface to see the underlying mechanisms. This article starts from the underlying asset allocation, net asset value pricing design, and liquidity design to objectively analyze how pAlpha operates under the shell of RealFi.

The underlying construction logic of pAlpha is to bundle two types of vastly different assets: 70% high-yield structured consumer credit and 30% short-duration U.S. Treasury assets. This 70/30 allocation intends to find a balance between yield and liquidity. Unlike native DeFi protocols that rely on token inflation to support APY, pAlpha uses a common net asset value (NAV) pricing typical of asset management products. This means that its yield performance is directly linked to cash flow recovery and fair value changes of the underlying assets. Additionally, the product features a clear fundraising period and lock-up period while managing exits through a notification window, with the target yield being the expected result after the base rate of the underlying assets and the periodic incentive mechanisms are layered together. From the perspective of RealFi, pAlpha plays the role of an asset connector: on one hand, consumer credit and Treasury-type assets from the real world enter the crypto world through compliance, custody, fund structures, and on-chain issuance mechanisms; on the other hand, on-chain treasury, NAV shares, composable assets, cross-chain issuance, and DeFi interoperability scenarios allow these real assets to possess new liquidity and configurable attributes.

The article is divided into five parts. The first part discusses why the current market is refocusing on on-chain fixed income and RWA products; the second part dissects the product structure of pAlpha, the underlying assets, and the formation of returns; the third part interprets the timeline of the Pre-deposit phase, lock-up logic, and mechanism design; the fourth part summarizes the key points of risk control, compliance, and execution; the fifth part discusses the allocation value of pAlpha within the Pharos ecosystem and the broader DeFi context. Following this trail, we can gain a clearer understanding of the product-level highlights of pAlpha: it offers an on-chain fixed-income framework that balances sources of return, liquidity arrangements, risk buffers, and product extensibility.

Keywords: Pharos; pAlpha; RWA Vault; Pre-deposit; on-chain fixed income

01 Why the Current Market Needs On-Chain Fixed Income

1.1 What Kind of Return Products is the Current Market Seeking

As it enters a new phase, traditional DeFi yields are generally declining, and the pure reliance on trading, lending, or incentive cycles is gradually converging, shifting the focus of market discussions. Funds are beginning to turn their attention to another more core question: can on-chain finance accommodate the value relations of the real world and provide return products that can be held across cycles? Any financial system that relies long-term on short-term sentiment, one-sided rising expectations, and aggressive liquidity subsidies often reveals sustainability issues when the market contracts. Products that can sediment long-term capital, attract institutions, and form allocation logic usually share several common characteristics: clear sources of returns, defined risk boundaries, predictable liquidity arrangements, and legal and governance structures that can withstand scrutiny.

RWA has thus returned to the center of the industry under this demand. The continuous attention to this track from the market stems from its introduction of new sources of returns to on-chain finance and new product organizing methods. Assets such as loans, bills, government bonds, and fund shares coming from the real world possess verifiable cash flows; when they enter on-chain in a compliant, traceable, and manageable manner, what users encounter is no longer merely a token corresponding to a certain type of asset, but a class of income units that can be further developed into products, built into bundles, and turned into allocation tools. For users, more meaningful discussions can then arise: whether the returns have a real basis, whether the subscriptions and redemptions have discipline, whether risks have buffers, rather than solely judging based on short-term APY levels.

1.2 The Narrative of Returns is Changing

In the early stages of the crypto industry, yield and growth were almost synonymous. Users entering the on-chain world often sought price elasticity, early dividends, and excess returns from liquidity subsidies. This model was highly attractive during periods of rapid market expansion, as it amplified participants' imaginations of future growth and allowed on-chain finance to quickly educate users and expand ecosystems. However, as the market gradually matures and participant structures begin to change, new issues also arise: one group has larger amounts of capital and longer timeframes, requiring more stable and explainable sources of returns; another group consists of existing users who have experienced multiple cycles and become aware that relying solely on high-volatility assets is insufficient for complete asset allocation. Thus, the question of where returns come from has become more important than how high the returns may be.

In this context, real returns have become one of the most valued directions in on-chain finance. The so-called real returns focus not on the promotional connotation of the word "real," but rather on the independent cash flow foundation that exists outside of token price fluctuations. Whether it is government bond yields, credit spreads, bill discounts, or rental repayments, their logic differs from the market's willingness to chase the price of a certain token. The value of this type of return lies in the opportunity it gives on-chain products to escape the path of entirely relying on risk preferences for the first time, shifting part of the income sources back to real economic activities themselves. For users, this means that on-chain allocations do not have to always choose between stablecoins and high-volatility assets but can find a middle ground that retains both yield and defensive attributes.

The significance of fixed-income RWA products lies precisely in their filling of this middle ground. They focus on the balance between yield, liquidity, and risk, while also emphasizing defensive attributes and holding discipline in asset allocation. Increasingly, on-chain funds wish to find return exposures with lower correlations to high-volatility assets like BTC and ETH, which enhances the appeal of fixed-income RWA Vaults. The questions users are concerned with are also evolving: whether the returns have a basis, whether subscription and redemption have rules, who will bear the losses initially, and whether the exit path is clear. These questions form the core that products like pAlpha need to address in their design.

1.3 What is RealFi Emphasized by Pharos?

In the current market environment, the on-chain return structure is undergoing changes. On one hand, traditional DeFi yields are generally declining, and the pure reliance on trading, lending, or incentive cycles is gradually converging; on the other hand, more funds are starting to pay attention to income forms related to real economic activities that have independent cash flow sources. In this context, on-chain fixed income and RWA are back into the center of discussions.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。