According to data from AiCoin, the cryptocurrency market is undergoing a significant structural transition. Haseeb Qureshi, a partner at Dragonfly, pointed out on May 2, 2026, that retail investors have substantially exited the market, while institutional investors are forming a substantial bottom for Bitcoin's price. Under this narrative, Bitcoin is seen as a mature asset base with continuous growth potential over the next 15 to 20 years, while financial scenarios such as DeFi, exchanges, and RWA (Real World Assets) have become key entry points connecting traditional finance and the on-chain ecosystem due to their strong user stickiness. Meanwhile, the compliance process is deeply penetrating the foundational infrastructure: on May 3, 2026, BlackRock submitted a comment letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) opposing a 20% quantitative cap on tokenized reserve assets, emphasizing that risk assessment should be based on credit quality and liquidity, rather than the form of distributed ledger holding. Bakkt also completed the acquisition of DTR by issuing over 11.3 million shares on May 1, attempting to integrate institutional-level infrastructure with a native payment engine, creating an all-weather digital settlement layer.

As the institutional wave accelerates, the market is digesting historical risks through differentiated paths. The DeFi sector has demonstrated strong self-repair capabilities; in response to the bad debts in the CRV-long Llamalend fund pool triggered by the crash in October 2025, Curve launched an on-chain market-based recovery mechanism on May 1, 2026, allowing affected creditors to choose strategies between direct sale, holding on, or providing liquidity, marking an evolution of risk management from protocol liquidation to market-based clearing. In contrast, the trust crisis in the CeFi sector has entered the judicial disposal stage: on April 30, 2026, South Korean prosecutors sought a 20-year prison sentence for the CEO of Delio, who is suspected of a fraud case involving approximately $190 million. This stark contrast between "on-chain self-rescue" and "centralized punishment" reveals that in a new cycle supported by institutions, DeFi risk governance and compliance regulation are jointly reshaping the credit landscape in crypto finance.

Retail Exit, Institutional Support: The Power of Bitcoin Pricing Is Shifting

In the interweaving of the aftermath of CeFi trust and the reshaping of DeFi mechanisms, the microstructure of the cryptocurrency market is undergoing fundamental changes. According to AiCoin, Haseeb Qureshi noted that retail investors are showing a significant exit trend, while institutional investors are building ongoing positions, becoming a substantial bottom supporting Bitcoin's price. This handover of pricing power means that Bitcoin is transitioning from a highly volatile speculative target to a mature asset viewed by institutions as having continuous growth potential for 15 to 20 years. This long-cycle allocation logic provides a solid "bottom support" effect for the market but also raises the bar for the narrative capabilities of altcoins, which must possess clear value capture logic to attract existing retail investors again.

From the perspectives of fund flows and user stickiness, the core narrative of the cryptocurrency industry still revolves tightly around "money and finance." Haseeb Qureshi believes that in the current cycle, areas such as DeFi, stablecoins, exchanges, and RWA (Real World Assets) are demonstrating extreme vitality and have become important entry points connecting traditional finance and the crypto world. As the market enters a phase of stock game and deeper institutionalization, future incremental space will be filled by low-risk, preference users. Furthermore, the involvement of AI technology is becoming a key variable; in the future, agents may play intermediary roles in complex transactions, enhancing financial accessibility through automation and intelligent means, thus reconstructing interaction patterns between retail investors and protocols under an institution-led framework.

BlackRock's Bakkt Entry: The Regulatory Game of Tokenized Reserve

In the process of institutions reshaping the market bottom, the game of regulatory framework has extended from mere asset compliance to the asset forms of underlying reserves. On May 3, 2026, BlackRock submitted a comment letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), directly targeting the reserve restrictions for "Permitted Payment Token Issuers" (PPSI) in the draft rules of the GENIUS Act. This bill was signed by Trump last July, establishing a legal framework for the issuance of payment-type assets under federal charter. However, the OCC proposed to set a 20% quantitative cap on tokenized reserve assets in its implementation details. BlackRock explicitly opposed this, arguing that the risk profile of reserve assets should depend on their credit quality, duration, and liquidity, rather than whether the assets are held or transferred on a distributed ledger. According to BlackRock, such rigid constraints on technological paths are "unrelated" to regulatory goals, essentially limiting institutions' ability to optimize liquidity management using on-chain technology.

In tandem with the legal arguments on the regulatory side, platforms with traditional financial backgrounds are accelerating their penetration into the settlement layer through mergers and acquisitions. On May 1, 2026, Bakkt (now renamed Bakkt Inc.) announced the completion of the acquisition of payment infrastructure company Distributed Technologies Research (DTR) by issuing over 11.3 million shares. This move aims to deeply integrate Bakkt's institutional-grade infrastructure with DTR’s native AI payment engine and payment asset technology, creating an all-weather digital settlement layer. Previously, Bakkt raised $48 million through stock sales in February to address delisting risks; this acquisition and transformation mark a strategic shift towards connecting traditional finance and the next generation of digital assets. This end-to-end layout from reserve management games to the AI-driven clearing end demonstrates that institutional capital is no longer satisfied with passive bottom support, but rather seeks to seize future financial discourse through tokenized reserves and automated clearing within the compliant PPSI framework.

Curve Bad Debt Clearance: What Do On-Chain Self-Rescue Solutions Look Like?

Reviewing the severe market fluctuations in October 2025, Curve Finance's lending protocol Llamalend faced a severe liquidity test. According to data from AiCoin, the downward pressure in the market directly impacted fund pools concentrated in leveraged positions like CRV-long, causing a severe decoupling between oracle prices and actual liquidity depth on-chain. Under such extreme pressure, the surge in liquidation slippage and lack of buying interest created bad debts in parts of the Llamalend market that could not be cleared through conventional liquidation, directly leading to some deposit users facing withdrawal restrictions and asset book losses. This event not only exposed the vulnerabilities of collateral lending protocols during liquidity contraction cycles but also forced the protocol layer to seek more resilient risk mitigation measures beyond traditional rigid liquidations.

In response to this legacy issue, Curve officially introduced an on-chain market mechanism-based "Recovery Path" around May 1, 2026, attempting to clear bad debts through market logic. The core of this solution involves assetizing the impaired claims and giving users three flexible disposal strategies: affected users can choose to directly sell impaired claims in the secondary market for immediate exit at market discounts, or continue to hold claims waiting for potential recovery through long-term income or mechanism adjustments by the protocol; additionally, the protocol introduced liquidity repair incentives, allowing users to participate in the bad debt recovery process by providing liquidity to specific pools in exchange for transaction fees and additional protocol incentives.

The introduction of this solution signifies that DeFi risk management is transitioning from "protocol rigidity acceptance" to "market-based debt restructuring." Unlike the complex bankruptcy reorganization in traditional finance, the transferability of claims achieved through on-chain smart contracts significantly enhances the efficiency of risk asset disposal for Curve. By tying bad debt recovery to the future cash flows and liquidity of the protocol, this self-rescue mechanism not only alleviates community anxiety over payouts but also technically validates the potential for decentralized finance to self-clear and self-repair after extreme volatility. This evolution from institutional bottom support to on-chain endogenous self-rescue is redefining the survival boundaries of DeFi protocols under extreme market conditions.

Polymarket Bets on Chainlink Oracles

On May 2, 2026, the leading prediction market Polymarket announced the introduction of mainstream oracles such as Chainlink and Pyth, aiming to reduce settlement risks through diverse data sources. This move signifies that the prediction market is shifting from an early mechanism of "controversial gambling" to more certain hard data settlements. According to data from AiCoin, with the exponential growth of the prediction market scale, the vulnerability of a single settlement path has become a core challenge for the protocol. Polymarket's introduction of multiple oracles essentially adds a layer of "financial-grade" insurance to its settlement logic against the backdrop of substantial institutional capital inflow, ensuring the reliability of large capital settlement under extreme events.

The intense differentiation within the oracle track is reshaping the risk landscape of DeFi's underlying infrastructure. The market is presenting a noticeable "three-way division" trend: UMA, despite holding first-mover advantage in prediction market settlements, has recently faced governance disputes, raising questions about the efficiency and fairness of its decentralized dispute resolution mechanism; Chainlink, as the industry leader, while boasting high security barriers, is facing growth pressure in stock games and is actively seeking new value capture points through vertical tracks like Polymarket; at the same time, Pyth, with its low-latency pricing characteristics, is rapidly capturing market share in this niche area of prediction markets. This differentiation is not only a competition of technical solutions but also a direct fight for data pricing power and the finality of settlements.

In the context of deepening institutionalization, data sources and settlement logic have evolved into new risk hubs for DeFi infrastructure. As market observers point out, when retail exits and institutions become the market bottom, the protocols' requirements for certainty far exceed those of the past. Any settlement deviation caused by oracle pricing discrepancies or governance loopholes could trigger a chain reaction in on-chain liquidity. Polymarket's approach toward established solutions like Chainlink reflects a paradigm shift in DeFi protocols’ risk control—by introducing infrastructure with strong consensus, they are stripping settlement risks from "consensus disputes" within the protocol and transforming it into data verification based on on-chain hard facts. This return to high-reliability oracles is becoming a key path for DeFi to reshape trust after extreme volatility.

Delio High-Interest Collapse: Amplifying the CeFi Trust Crisis

Unlike on-chain protocols that hedge risks through transparent algorithms, centralized lending platforms (CeFi) often turn into systemic fraud during market downturns. The collapse of South Korean crypto lending operator Delio reveals this typical risk model: the platform attracted investors to deposit crypto assets with high-interest rates but suddenly suspended withdrawals without warning on June 14, 2023, causing mass panic. Subsequent judicial investigations revealed a financial black hole behind it; South Korean prosecutors alleged that Delio's CEO Chung Sang-ho embezzled approximately 250 billion won (about $190 million) from around 2,800 victims.

Entering 2026, this CeFi trust crisis officially entered the judicial liquidation stage. According to reports on April 30, 2026, prosecutors have requested a court to sentence the CEO to 20 years in prison, with the first-instance verdict expected on July 16. In the prosecution, the prosecutors emphasized that there were active fraudulent actions and false advertising during Delio's operations, causing massive losses, and the defendant subsequently adopted a non-cooperative attitude to evade responsibility. This severe sentencing recommendation sends a clear regulatory signal that tolerance for behaviors that use centralized custodial structures to conceal asset losses is rapidly decreasing to a freezing point.

Delio's downfall stands in stark contrast to the "on-chain self-rescue" of protocols like Curve Finance mentioned above. Within the DeFi system, the handling of bad debts is based on open market mechanisms, such as Curve allowing users to choose between trading impaired claims or holding for repair, with the entire process clearly visible in financial paths; conversely, Delio's model typifies a "high-interest trap," lacking real-time auditing of asset flows, with risk outbreaks exhibiting delayed and catastrophic characteristics. This case reiterates a market reminder that as institutions enter to build price bottoms, users' recognition of risks in financial products must shift from a simple "yield-oriented" perspective to a profound examination of the underlying assets' transparency.

Institutional Support and On-Chain Risk Control: Where to Look Next

The current cryptocurrency market is in a multi-layered risk pattern interweaving institutional support, regulatory intervention, and protocol self-rescue. With retail investors' exit noted by Dragonfly partner Haseeb Qureshi, institutions not only built a price bottom with Bitcoin's spot assets but also directed incremental expectations toward low-risk savings assets and passive investment products. This structural change promotes a migration of market risk pricing logic: in core areas such as tokenized reserve regulation, on-chain bad debt clearing, and oracle selection, the competitive focus is shifting from mere "yield stories" to "infrastructure quality." BlackRock's strong rebuttal against the OCC's proposed 20% cap on tokenized reserves essentially reflects that traditional financial giants are striving to revert on-chain asset risks to general financial dimensions, such as credit quality, duration, and liquidity, rather than being confined to ledger forms.

Looking ahead, the governance game between on-chain and off-chain will become a key variable in determining ecosystem resilience. Future attention should focus on the OCC's final rule implementation regarding the GENIUS Act, which directly relates to the liquidity boundaries of stablecoin reserves under the PPSI framework. Moreover, the practical execution effects of the Curve bad debt recovery mechanism will validate whether DeFi protocols can smoothly complete self-rescue paths such as "debt-to-equity swaps" or "debt trading" via marketization after extreme volatility occurs. Additionally, the "three-way split" pattern in the oracle track and the settlement security of mainstream prediction markets like Polymarket will further define the underlying certainty of on-chain finance. In the CeFi domain, the judicial handling progress of cases like Delio will continue to serve as a warning signal, reminding investors to be cautious of the moral hazards brought by information asymmetry in the institutional wave.

Join our community to discuss together and grow stronger!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
AiCoin On-Chain: https://aicoin.com/hyperliquid
Exclusive Hyperliquid Benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster Benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。