On May 5, 2026, under the lights of the main venue at Consensus Miami 2026, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes chose, as usual, to open the topic with a heavy blow——he told the projects, funds, and speculators in the audience that he wasn't surprised that "about 99% of altcoins or junk coins are likely to end up at zero," because "that's just a normal market cleaning process." This wasn't a casual remark, but the main theme of his speech: he repeatedly emphasized that a high elimination rate is not an anomaly in the cryptocurrency world, but the norm in the world of risky assets. To prove this point, he pulled back to the history of the S&P 500 since 1929, pointing out that in nearly a century of turnover, about 98% of component companies ultimately perished or were replaced, reminding the audience: in the traditional stock market, most stocks will similarly exit the stage in the long run. Such an analogy was quickly condensed into a glaring headline in social media and various Chinese cryptocurrency media——"99% of altcoins will go to zero"——supporters believed he was merely stating a harsh reality, while opponents questioned whether this was a simplistic and crude judgment on the entire innovation track, with the core of the controversy being his view that this round of eliminations was a necessary process of survival of the fittest, rather than an abnormal incident that needed to be lamented as a disaster.

99% Altcoin Zero Warning

Behind the statement "99% of altcoins/junk coins will go to zero," Hayes is not pointing at the entire cryptocurrency world, but rather at the long tail that has been filled countless times: copy-pasted projects, narrative coins that rise on trends, tokens with no clear business model but crazy issuance, all of which he tossed into the "junk coin" bucket in his context. He did not classify these assets in detail but used a rough ratio to place them in the same position as the S&P historical elimination rate——most risky assets are destined to be washed out, and only a small handful can survive. Several Chinese media outlets like techflow, Planet Daily, and panews brought this statement to the headlines, and the point of contention is not whether he is "bearish on everything," but rather the fact that he labels these tokens as "destined to disappear," continuing his long-standing criticism of the altcoin bubble.

On stage, he deliberately described the high failure rate as a normal state of "creative destruction" rather than a disaster that requires collective panic: just as he used the near-century turnover history of the S&P 500 as an analogy, going to zero is not an accidental explosion, but rather the market filtering out ineffective experiments. Compared to the narrative often used in the crypto circle during bull markets——"new narratives, new tracks, every cycle has new blue chips" "as long as you can withstand the volatility, eventually, one round will come to you"——this way of speaking is almost an open dismantling of the party atmosphere: if 99% of tokens ultimately result in zero, then what he sees as the so-called "altcoin season" resembles a gamble with a predetermined ending, as most people only remember the myth of that 1% of survivors and ignore the vast scale of the graveyard.

98% Disappearance of S&P 500

To calm those still immersed in "this time is different," Hayes threw out a seemingly unrelated number: since 1929, about 98% of the constituent stocks in the S&P 500 have ultimately disappeared from the index list——some went bankrupt, were acquired, and some were quietly replaced by more competitive new companies. He deliberately stretched this timeline to nearly a century, solely to emphasize one point: in the world of traditional stocks, "the endgame of most assets is elimination," has always been the norm, and not only a disaster that altcoins will experience.

He then juxtaposed this data with the current token market: if in the S&P 500, regarded as a "blue chip concentration camp," the vast majority of companies in the long run are equivalent to "going to zero," then a 99% death rate for a more chaotic and volatile token market is not outrageous. What's really worth paying attention to, instead, is that 2% of companies that are left behind——they constitute what people today refer to as "blue chips," supporting most of the value of the index. Hayes used this to steer the discussion back to the core contradiction in the crypto world: the legendary stories you are enamored with actually belong to that extremely small number of survivors, and the rules of this asset survival game have not changed from Wall Street to the blockchain.

Why Cryptocurrency Cleansing is More Brutal

If the one hundred years of the S&P 500 is a long play with slowly changing actors, in Hayes' eyes, the cryptocurrency world plays it in fast-forward. He placed the two together on stage, not comparing who is crueler, but rather who acts faster——according to some reported accounts, he believes that the collapse and cleansing speed of crypto assets is significantly higher overall than that of traditional stock markets, the reason is not complicated: tokens can be traded 24 hours a day without interruption, there is almost no unified delisting, information disclosure, or strong constraints framework, with less regulation and trading restrictions, allowing prices to run up and down without resistance in a more chaotic environment. This judgment has mainly appeared in post-conference reports and secondary compilations, but does not conflict with the intuitive experience of market participants over the past decade.

With the pace accelerated, the lifespan and price path of altcoins have also been rewritten. In traditional stocks, a company's journey to "going to zero" is often a long process of profit decline, valuation sinking, and liquidity drying up, while in the various ups and downs of the crypto market, many tokens fall significantly in a short amount of time from high levels, even nearing zero, as the cleansing is compressed into a few moments of extreme volatility. What Hayes tries to emphasize is: when 24-hour trading and fewer restrictions raise the cleansing frequency, the vast majority of altcoins will not experience a frog-boiling exit but will be more like being suddenly abandoned by the market after several rounds of extreme fluctuations, which means that for participants, mispricing is corrected faster, but the cost is often a shorter, steeper, and more direct trajectory toward the end.

Choices of Speculators and Survivors

From the perspective of "99% going to zero," Hayes is actually forcing everyone to first acknowledge one premise: most tokens in your hands are more like short-lived high-risk chips rather than assets that can be safely held for ten years. For pure speculators, this simplifies the play——treat every new token as an option that will die, only entering and exiting in the most frenzied intervals of sentiment and liquidity, without the illusion of being overly optimistic about a single project's story beyond one cycle, because historical bull and bear cycles have proven that most tokens will be forgotten by the market after extreme fluctuations, becoming "zombies" on the blockchain.

What is truly difficult is for those who consider themselves to be making "long-term investments." Hayes uses the analogy of the 98% component stocks being replaced in nearly a hundred years of the S&P to remind them: even in the traditional stock market, it is extremely difficult to bet on the few companies that will persist long-term and produce excess returns, and this difficulty is only amplified in the more rapidly cleansing world of tokens. Some reports have pointed out that he tends to view Bitcoin as a value storage tool and place the vast majority of altcoins in the basket of high-risk speculative assets (this still requires further verification), corresponding to a role division: using assets with relatively higher certainty as the long-term "base," while treating those projects that might go to zero 99% of the time or have a chance of increasing by thousands of times as strictly limited high-volatility positions. For participants, the true choice is not about whether to take risks, but rather how to delineate between value storage and high-risk speculation after acknowledging that a high elimination rate is the norm, and accept that the probability of making mistakes on the survivor list is also very high.

Who Will Survive After the Bubble

From "99% of altcoins going to zero" to the nearly 98% replacement rate of the S&P 500 over the past century, to his view of a faster and more violent cleansing rhythm in crypto, Hayes' speech on May 5, 2026, at Consensus Miami 2026, was actually measuring two worlds with the same yardstick: whether it's on-chain tokens or traditional stocks, the fate of the vast majority of participants is being kicked out by the times; a high elimination rate is not an exception, but a part of the system itself. Taking this point as a premise, investors no longer need to be surprised by "will the project die," but should assume that death is almost inevitable before entering, only the timing and sequence differ, thus adjusting their expectations for altcoins, viewing them as high-volatility chips that are very likely to disappear, rather than as long-term assets destined to grow into "new blue chips." Meanwhile, Hayes' seemingly extreme judgment should not be treated as a prophecy, but rather as a working framework for understanding market cycles and bubble cleansings: it reminds you that behind every bull market frenzy lies the brewing of the next round of liquidation lists, and what needs to be contemplated is not whether his reported "99%" is precise, but whether you have already incorporated such extreme views into your toolbox for understanding market norms and your own risk boundaries.

Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。