On May 9, 2026, Bank of America’s Global Research Department threw a new interest rate forecast into an already tense market sentiment: in this adjustment, Bank of America directly pushed back the timing of the Federal Reserve's "first rate cut" to the second half of 2027, completely erasing any possibilities of a rate cut in the current year from the baseline scenario. For Wall Street, which was still betting on the "start of the rate cut cycle within this year," this was not just a minor adjustment in the forecast range, but a complete overturning of the mainstream narrative that had been reinforced over the past few months. Bank of America’s reasons were not fancy—inflation levels remain high, employment growth remains strong, and in this macro backdrop, maintaining high interest rates is seen as a more rational choice than an early shift to easing. This report puts inflation and employment back at the center of the interest rate game, and it plants new storylines for asset pricing in the coming years.

The Narrative of Rate Cuts This Year is Thwarted: Expectation Gaps Tear Wall Street Apart

The first to be overturned was actually Bank of America's own script. Previously, it had been narrating a gently declining interest rate curve based on the path of "one cut in September and one in October this year," but now in the latest report, it has directly kicked the timing of the first rate cut to the second half of 2027 and simply removed all rate cut assumptions for this year. This is not just a simple "move back a few meetings," but a drastic turnaround from "twice this year" to "at least wait another year and a half," bringing the uncertainty that was originally written in the footnotes of the research report to the center of the conclusion.

The impact is greater because this shift directly collides with the widely accepted narrative of "the beginning of the rate cut cycle within this year." That narrative had once been regarded as the default background, with high-frequency trading models, asset allocation plans, and even some risk appetites built on the premise that "the Federal Reserve will soon start to ease." When Bank of America set "higher interest rates for longer" as the new baseline scenario, Wall Street was forced to confront a rate world that is no longer gentle: traders need to recalibrate the Federal Reserve’s path, recalibrate the treasury yield curve, and institutional investors need to review all their valuation assumptions linked to "quick rate cuts," with the real test being who can find the new balance point between interest rates and asset prices first in this expectation rip apart.

From Replacing Powell to High-Interest Norms: The Flip of Bank of America’s Model

Before Bank of America’s latest report delayed the first rate cut to the second half of 2027, its old version of the model had an almost unspoken premise: the White House would nominate a new Federal Reserve chairman. Background information shows that Bank of America once set "Trump nominating Kevin Warsh to replace Jerome Powell" as a key node in its internal scenario assumptions, under which it believed the new chairman would guide decision-makers towards a more accommodative monetary policy, thereby providing narrative support for "one rate cut each in September and October this year." Political personnel became an invisible variable in the interest rate curve; once there is a personnel change, interest rates should follow suit, which was the inherent logic of that version of the model.

However, this political path has yet to materialize, the leadership and policy orientation of the Federal Reserve have remained consistent, and the realities of high inflation and good employment provide objective conditions for maintaining high interest rates. The "quick leadership change + rapid easing" combination that Bank of America originally bet on has been dismantled by facts one by one. The result is that what is now presented to the market is a completely rewritten interest rate script: in the new expectations released by Bank of America on May 9, it no longer expects any rate cuts this year, but instead pushes the rate cut timeline back to the second half of 2027, with "higher interest rates for longer" elevated to the baseline scenario. Along this timeline, a sharper question surfaces—when forecasts treat political games as the primary premise, it not only creates tension with the nominal goal of the Federal Reserve's "policy independence," but also becomes a sandcastle that will collapse as long as personnel remain unchanged.

Inflation Not Waning, Employment Not Cooling: Why High Rates Need to Be Extended for Several More Years

Starting from the new report on May 9, Bank of America has shifted the narrative focus from "who sits in the chair position" back to "the data itself." The primary reason publicly given is that inflation has not returned to the range deemed target by the Federal Reserve: price pressures stubbornly persist, inflation levels remain high, and any premature signal of easing could be interpreted as a tolerance of inflation regarding both bond yields and public expectations. Under this judgment, delaying the first rate cut to the second half of 2027 is no longer an extreme scenario, but is seen by Bank of America as the "baseline path."

In the same report, the description of employment is placed almost equally in importance with inflation: employment growth remains strong, the labor market has not shown significant cooling, and the macro environment can be summarized as "inflation has not yet fallen back to the target range, and employment is still robust." In other words, there has been neither a rapid drop in prices forcing a rate cut, nor a surge in unemployment compelling the central bank to intervene. The Federal Reserve lacks the urgent macro pressure to cut rates immediately, and high interest rates actually appear reasonable and safe. In the combination of strong inflation and employment, Bank of America believes that the market's previous bets on a "quick shift this year" are more of a wishful thinking, while "higher interest rates for longer" is the policy route that is more consistent with real constraints.

The Chain Reaction of Long-Term High Rates: From Treasury Yields to Discounting Risk Assets

At the moment when Bank of America pushed the first rate cut timeline back to the second half of 2027 and "higher interest rates for longer" was incorporated into the baseline scenario, the market's risk-free interest rate anchor was passively raised. Maintaining high policy rates for an extended period means that the yield center for treasury and other interest rate assets must shift upwards, new issuance rates need to align with the higher policy level, while existing positions endure book pressure in the process of rising yields and passive price adjustments. For institutions accustomed to using "an impending rate cut" as a hypothesis for allocating duration assets, this is not just a simple curve shift but a complete reinitialization of the pricing framework.

The chain reaction of rising discount rates soon transmits to equities and high-volatility assets. A higher risk-free yield raises the capital costs of all assets, future cash flows, growth narratives, and even the forward imagination of crypto assets all need to be discounted anew under the new discount factor, and a part of the valuation space that previously relied on a low interest rate environment naturally gets compressed. For participants in the crypto market, the reassessment of macro liquidity and interest rate paths will directly change the rhythm of capital inflow and outflow as well as leverage preferences: when the Federal Reserve's own guidance differs from the path forecasts of major investment banks like Bank of America, traders bet back and forth between the two scripts, frequent corrections of expectations will amplify price volatility until volatility itself becomes a core variable in asset pricing.

After the Reset of Expectations: A Test of Endurance for Traders, Central Banks, and Bank of America

By rewriting its path from "two rate cuts this year" to "not until the second half of 2027," Bank of America has effectively switched the market script from "easing is on the way" to "high interest rates are the new norm." In this script, high inflation and strong employment are no longer just macro backgrounds but are hard constraints embedded in the model: as long as prices do not clearly decline and the labor market does not genuinely loosen, the Federal Reserve has no sufficient reason to ease conditions for risk assets. The problem is that the Federal Reserve has not provided such an aggressive timetable. There will be a prolonged tug-of-war between Wall Street research, central bank forward guidance, and real economic data. For participants in risk assets such as stocks and crypto, the old "low interest rate discount factor" has become ineffective, and the new price anchor can only be rebuilt repeatedly after each release of inflation and employment data, amidst continuously revised and faced expectations. The real question in this endurance race will be whether data forces the Federal Reserve to pivot earlier than Bank of America envisions, or if macro resilience provides enough ammunition for the high interest rate path of "not until after 2027."

Join our community, let’s discuss and get stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin English Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。