During the period from May 12 to 14, 2026, Charms, which completed a $1.5 million pre-seed round of financing, positioned itself at the intersection of AI characters and the on-chain economy: users can create, interact with, own, and monetize AI-driven character assets on the platform. The investors in this round include Lattice Fund, JME Ventures, and Base Ecosystem Fund, which is affiliated with Coinbase Ventures and the Base ecosystem. This, combined with Base's recent strategy of guiding funds and developers towards on-chain consumer applications through its funds, indicates that this direction is being viewed as a viable betting track by a more "mainstream" crypto capital system. The issue is, in the absence of cross-verified user scale, interaction frequency, and transaction data, whether Charms' emphasized "turning user emotional interactions with AI characters into tradable 'living assets'" can create sustainable on-chain consumer demand and how to define its asset attributes and compliance boundaries under an still unclear global data and AI regulatory framework, becomes the core question that truly needs to be answered regarding this $1.5 million investment.

Emotional Interaction Becomes Asset: What Charms Wants to Sell is Companionship

In Charms' design, the emotional interactions that repeatedly occur between users and AI characters are abstracted into a type of "character asset" that can be created, owned, and monetized. Users do not just generate a digital image once, but continuously invest time, energy, and emotion around a specific character; this accumulation is packaged by the project party as an asset's "growth trajectory," ultimately corresponding to a tradable record on the chain. The project party describes this kind of character as a "living asset": they are not static digital collectibles like traditional ones, but continuously iterate with user input and feedback, with their status and value set to change with interaction, and complete the mapping of assetization and trading on-chain.

In this narrative, the core Charms wants to sell is not a single piece of content but a "companionship relationship" that can be registered and circulated. Once emotional interactions are assetized, the consumption scenario naturally shifts from one-time payments to ongoing payments surrounding the character: users may accept payment requirements in identity binding, function unlocking, and asset appreciation expectations to maintain a sense of exclusivity and continuity in emotional connection with the character, transforming originally entertainment-oriented behavior into spending decisions on the chain. Whether this 'living asset' logic centered on "companionship" can be translated from conceptual packaging to genuine willingness to pay, with repeat purchasing and premium potential, is one of the key variables determining whether Charms' business model can succeed.

Lattice Fund Bets on Emotional Assets

The $1.5 million pre-seed disclosed by Charms has been completed by several institutions, with confirmed contributors including Lattice Fund, Base Ecosystem Fund, and JME Ventures, clearly positioned as exploratory funding prior to the seed stage. This indicates that Charms has received funding and endorsement from three institutional partners while still at an early stage where the product and data have not yet formed a verifiable commercial loop. Notably, Lattice Fund is not acting alone but is jointly betting on the same "AI character asset" path with the ecologically-oriented Base Ecosystem Fund and another venture capital firm.

From Lattice Fund's perspective, in the current cautious financing environment for early-stage projects in the crypto and AI fields, where average check sizes for pre-seed rounds are shrinking, directly participating in a $1.5 million early round is more like a pre-strategy layout for the direction of "emotional interaction assetization": on one hand, this funding amount is sufficient to cover a lengthy product iteration cycle for a project with no public operating data yet, reflecting an intentional amplification of experimental space for the team in AI character modeling and on-chain economic design; on the other hand, choosing to enter the project still dominated by concept and mechanism design also indicates a willingness to test with funds whether "living assets" can convert into ongoing payments and asset premiums on the real user side. For Charms, this pre-seed capital willing to bear early uncertainties, even in a cautious cycle, resembles an option for emotional on-chain assets, and whether such options can be exercised by the market in the future will directly determine the returns and reference value of Lattice Fund's current bet.

Base Ecosystem Bets on AI + On-Chain Consumption

The appearance of Base Ecosystem Fund in Charms' $1.5 million pre-seed list is already a clear ecological signal. This fund belongs to Coinbase Ventures and the Base ecosystem and is intended to guide the flow of funds as one of the core tools during the Base acceleration phase from 2023 to 2025. This indicates that this round is not just a financial bet on a single project, but a mark given by the Coinbase system in the direction of "AI characters + on-chain economy": willing to tilt resources towards experiments that directly convert end-user interaction and emotional participation into on-chain consumer behavior.

From a broader strategic context, Base has been supporting consumer applications targeting end-users through ecological funds and other means in recent years, shifting the narrative from infrastructure performance towards scenarios where "people are genuinely spending and willing to stay." Charms abstracts the continuous interaction of AI characters into tradable "living assets," which aligns closely with the consumption scenarios Base aims to cultivate: on one hand, it provides Base with a testing ground to verify whether "emotional interaction can be assetized and form ongoing payments"; on the other hand, if Charms can generate a certain scale of users and transactions in the early stage without public operating data, it has the opportunity to become a traffic entrance for Base under the AI narrative, providing samples for subsequent AI interaction applications to access or reuse these asset forms, and whether these samples can establish viability will directly influence Base's further investment in the AI + on-chain consumption direction.

Emotional Assets on the Chain: Regulatory and Ethical Questions

Making emotional interactions with AI characters into "living assets" means that the user's conversation records, preferences, interaction frequencies, and other highly sensitive data are incorporated into the core of product design, and these data inherently possess significant personal privacy attributes. Globally, regulations surrounding data protection and privacy are tightening, with a series of frameworks represented by GDPR placing strict constraints on the collection, use, and cross-border transfer of user data. For products like Charms, once emotional interactions are tied to asset ownership, the project party must answer a direct question: to maintain asset attributes, how much user behavior information needs to be retained, and whether this information has been adequately disclosed and authorized for commercial use.

More challenging is that most legal jurisdictions still have no clear legal definitions for AI-generated content and personalized agents, while what Charms is attempting is to designate continuously interactive digital characters as transferable assets. This design connects to users' emotional projections on one side, while on the other side could be interpreted by regulatory agencies as a product with investment attributes, triggering discussions on consumer protection or financial regulation. At the same time, when AI characters present misleading suggestions or inappropriate behavior during interactions, the responsibility falls on the user, the platform, or the underlying model provider, currently lacking a formed consensus. In this regulatory and ethical gray area, similar projects can only control compliance costs by tightening data usage boundaries, clarifying risk disclosures, and responsibility allocations; otherwise, whether "emotional assets can be institutionalized" will largely depend on how future regulations specifically characterize this type of new product.

How Far from Early Experiments to Large-Scale Applications

Charms' completion of a $1.5 million pre-seed financing essentially sends a strong capital signal for the direction of "AI characters + on-chain economy" against the backdrop of Base and similar second-layer networks leaning resources toward on-chain consumption applications from 2023 to 2025: the assetization of emotional interactions and entry into a tradable system is no longer just at the conceptual level but is starting to have early product experiments backed by funds. However, at this stage, Charms has only disclosed completion of the pre-seed round, and the number of similar projects on the market is also limited, leaving the entire track still in an exploratory period of "verifying whether this path is feasible." The so-called "living assets" must commercialize and sustain, with key uncertainties concentrated in three dimensions: first, the lack of publicly verifiable user scale and revenue data means that outsiders cannot assess whether users are genuinely willing to pay long-term for such emotional digital assets; second, once AI characters are assetized and tradable, whether stable secondary market demand and pricing logic can be formed, with no mature sample for reference at present; third, under the premise of evolving regulatory and compliance frameworks, the boundary constraints that such products might face in the future are still unclear. For the Base ecosystem, Base Ecosystem Fund's participation in this pre-seed round means it hopes to guide resources through funding and position "AI character assets" as a candidate form of terminal applications, with the possibility of more combination experiments around AI agents and character assets appearing on Base in the future; while in the broader crypto market, such projects are more like frontier experiments of high uncertainty in the short term, whether they can transition from early financing signals to an asset category widely adopted by users depends on whether projects like Charms can provide replicable answers on real demand, commercial loops, and compliance paths.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。