Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

Lawyer sues Tether: Who owns 344 million USDT?

CN
红线说书
Follow
3 hours ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

A team led by American lawyer Charles Gerstein recently submitted an application to the Manhattan federal court, requesting the judge to order Tether to handle and transfer approximately 344,149,759 USDT that have been locked on the blockchain—equivalent to about 344 million dollars— for the payment of a batch of terrorism case victims' judgments against Iran that have not been executed. The targeted tokens were originally sitting in two Tron wallet addresses until the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) identified these addresses as related to the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, after which Tether implemented a freeze on them in response to the sanction list, pinning the tokens on-chain and preventing further movement. Now, the plaintiffs seek to further transform this "freeze" into a "transfer": According to CoinDesk, they claim that since Tether can freeze the original tokens, it should reissue an equivalent amount of USDT to a wallet controlled by the plaintiff's lawyers within the technical and compliance framework in order to achieve the actual execution of the Iranian judgment. This request directly pushes the three parties—U.S. sanctions compliance, judicial seizure of digital assets, and the compensation needs of terrorism victims—onto the same rope; it also represents the lawyer team's attempt to extend the pursuit from controlling on-chain assets to the redistribution layer of the issuer's assets after their previous case concerning the seizure of Arbitrum crypto assets. So far, there is no public information indicating that the court has made a final ruling, and Tether has also not issued a formal response; the tug-of-war over "who can use frozen assets and for whom" remains in the exploratory stage of legal tactics and platform boundaries.

From Arbitrum Seizure to Targeting Tether

The same group of lawyers has completed the first round

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by 红线说书

5 hours ago
CLARITY Act and Trump's Holdings: Redrawing Cryptocurrency Rules
7 hours ago
CME cryptocurrency index futures and compliance bets on major mining companies.
16 hours ago
Senate CLARITY Hearing: Crypto Dollar Named
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatarAiCoin运营
40 minutes ago
From DOGE's volume surge to the exclusive airdrop of $CHIP: in-depth analysis of Aster's wealth accumulation path!
avatar
avatarAiCoin运营
50 minutes ago
Airdrop Radar: AI New Force o1.exchange, Ambush Points to Win Double Opportunities
avatar
avatarMatrixport
1 hour ago
BIT Research: If it followed the Nasdaq, Bitcoin should be close to $140,000.
avatar
avatar币圈院士
1 hour ago
Crypto Circle Academician: On the afternoon of May 15, a deep analysis of Ethereum from technical aspects to sentiment aspects, examining the entry logic and risks for the rise to 2250.
avatar
avatar链上雷达
1 hour ago
Crypto Bets Under Macro Storms
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink