This wonderful festival should have little bells!
This has unraveled a long-standing confusion for me. The most I talk about is investment discipline. Of course, compared to the previous several cycles, I have preserved my principal, and I claim my best operation in this cycle is having done nothing.
Patience is indeed important, but discipline is even more crucial. However, I find that after one cycle, I am still in the first layer described by @pcfli, which is to ensure that the principal does not suffer losses. But using overly strict investment discipline as an excuse for myself, refusing to accept new things, has led to missed opportunities and sell actions that should have been executed, which is very bad.
This is not to say that investment discipline is unnecessary, nor is it to say that principal is unimportant. The point is that missing out cannot simply be comforted with "it's not my money" or "being disciplined is not wrong."
This statement from my brother is key: if you miss out on a real profit and it’s not within your framework, it may also need reflection.
In recent years, I have repeatedly brainwashed myself with "this is not within my circle of competence." I think this is no longer discipline but has turned my circle of competence into a comfort zone.
My principle and discipline: stay alive, then compound.
There is definitely no problem with this, and I will continue to adhere to it in the future, but today I added a phrase: the bottom line is to ensure survival, and the boundary is to seek evolution.
The aging of the framework is a very scary thing. A truly mature investor not only needs to prevent losing money but also must guard against using "rationality" to cover stagnation.
Thanks again to @pcfli @OdysseysEth @zhendong2020 and @E2mResearch for bringing such great content together, giving me a sense of enlightenment this weekend morning.
免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。