On June 17, 2025, an address attributed by on-chain analyst Yu Jin to the government of the Kingdom of Bhutan transferred 533.2 BTC to Binance again, valued at approximately 34.52 million USD at the time. According to the same source, since June 2024, this address has been transferring to exchanges multiple times and interpreted by the market as selling operations, cumulatively reducing around 10,451 BTC, cashing out approximately 979 million USD, with an average price of about 93,738 USD; after the latest transfer, only about 1,750 BTC remained in the address, valued at around 113 million USD at the time, showing a significant reduction compared to earlier holdings. Several Chinese crypto media outlets used the expression "Bhutan continues to reduce BTC holdings" when reporting the receipt of the 533.2 BTC at Binance, but it should be emphasized that the Bhutanese government has not officially confirmed the address's ownership and specific strategy, and on-chain data itself cannot determine whether this transfer has been sold, only that it has entered the exchange, a potential sell-off area. Currently, Bitcoin prices are oscillating at relatively high levels, and research materials suggest that a concentrated reduction by sovereign participants at this position may be seen by the market as additional selling pressure, while in contrast, countries like El Salvador repeatedly emphasize a public stance of "long-term holding", forming several distinct sovereign Bitcoin routes beyond traditional selling paths in jurisdictions like the United States. Therefore, a sharper question emerges: how long can the narrative that "nations will treat Bitcoin as a long-term national treasury asset" be sustained when sovereign addresses represented by Bhutan begin to systematically reduce their holdings, and to what extent will this selling pace change the market's expectations regarding the supply side of Bitcoin?
Over 10,000 BTC sold in a year: Restoring the reduction path of Bhutan's address
From the timeline, the batch of addresses attributed by on-chain analyst Yu Jin as "related to the Bhutanese government" did not suddenly appear on June 17, 2025. Since June 2024, this address has repeatedly transferred Bitcoin to exchanges, with varying single transfer scales, but a highly consistent direction—flowing from self-custody addresses to centralized platforms, widely interpreted by the market as a gradual reduction. According to the same on-chain analysis source, over about a year, this address sold approximately 10,451 BTC, corresponding to a fiat currency value of about 979 million USD, with an average selling price of about 93,738 USD; after the latest transfer of 533.2 BTC to Binance (nominal value of about 34.52 million USD), the address still retains about 1,750 BTC, valued at around 113 million USD at the time, significantly reduced from earlier peaks.
It should be emphasized that this entire calculation of "sale scale" and "remaining holdings" is based on the on-chain attribution of the address, sourced from the same analytical path and cited by multiple media outlets, but the Bhutanese government has yet to make any public confirmation regarding the ownership of the address or operational strategy, nor can it be ruled out that Bhutan may control other unidentified Bitcoin addresses. From the on-chain information visible, it is currently only possible to confirm that this 533.2 BTC has entered wallets on exchanges like Binance, with no direct observation possible to determine whether it has already been completed for a transaction on the market or what the specific transaction price is, thus it can only be regarded as another link in the chain of continuous reduction over the past year rather than a transaction that can be definitively identified as "already sold", which also maintains a considerable degree of uncertainty for the market when judging whether the sovereign-related address has completed its reduction.
From hoarding to cashing out? Sovereign divergence between Bhutan and El Salvador
From the on-chain trajectory, the address attributed by Yu Jin to the Bhutanese government has cumulatively reduced about 10,451 BTC since June 2024 at relatively high Bitcoin prices, cashing out approximately 979 million USD, with an average price of about 93,738 USD. After this recent transfer of 533.2 BTC to Binance, the visible on-chain balance is around 1,750 BTC, nominally valued at about 113 million USD. Multiple Chinese media uniformly characterized this series of operations as "the government of the Kingdom of Bhutan continues to reduce BTC holdings", interpreting it as a sovereign route of "cashing out on highs" rather than the expected role of a "long-term hoarder" that the market anticipated earlier, which forms a striking contrast to many investors' hopes of sovereign addresses becoming passive locked-holders.
In contrast, since 2021, El Salvador has repeatedly announced its Bitcoin purchases, emphasizing the long-term holding rhetoric of "1 BTC = 1 BTC", positioning Bitcoin as part of the national asset portfolio; the U.S. government and relevant institutions have disposed of judicially seized Bitcoin through multiple rounds of auctions, reflecting another approach more inclined to "actively cash out". A horizontal comparison shows that differing views on the legal status of Bitcoin, fiscal pressures, and risk preferences lead to a high degree of divergence in the holdings and disposal routes of sovereign entities. This compels the market to revise its narrative that “Bitcoin will naturally evolve into a uniformly designated national reserve asset”—the more realistic assumption for the future is that sovereign addresses of various countries will intermittently increase or decrease their holdings on-chain at their own rhythm, rather than uniformly acting as a long-term supply black hole that never sells.
Fiscal pressure or asset reallocation? The portions that can and cannot be answered on-chain
Regarding this round of reduction, the market has provided several mainstream interpretations: some believe Bhutan may be "cashing out" to improve its overall balance sheet during the current high Bitcoin price interval; others view it as an adjustment of foreign exchange reserve structures or a phase conclusion of early mining and related investments. However, up to now, there have been no public materials showing that the Bhutanese government has given official explanations regarding this address or Bitcoin reductions, and existing studies also clearly indicate that this batch of sales cannot be directly attributed to any specific fiscal project or budget line; narratives such as "selling coins for a specific expenditure" remain at the level of speculation.
According to on-chain monitoring and multiple cross-references from various media, since June 2024, this address attributed by Yu Jin to the Bhutanese government has cumulatively reduced about 10,451 BTC, with another 533.2 BTC transferred to Binance on June 17, 2025, and only about 1,750 BTC remains in the address. The questions that on-chain data can clarify here are very clear: who transferred assets to the exchanges at what time and scale; however, it cannot tell us which year's hydropower mining output corresponds to these BTC, which energy monetization or investment returns, nor can it map the specific policy arrangements within Bhutan, and it is even less clear whether Bhutan controls other unidentified BTC addresses. For investors, it is more crucial to distinguish "verifiable on-chain facts" from "emotional extended reasoning" when interpreting sovereign address behaviors and to adjust their judgments on supply structures and sovereign participation paths based solely on the former.
10,000-level selling pressure: the marginal impact on Bitcoin prices
In terms of scale, according to on-chain analysis statistics, since June 2024, the Bhutan-related address has reduced about 10,451 BTC over about a year, scattered across multiple transfers to exchanges rather than dumping all its chips at once in a short period. In the context of the global BTC stock and annual transaction volume, this 10,000-level sale is notably conspicuous in scale but relatively smooth in rhythm, constituting an additional sell-off that can be gradually absorbed by the market rather than an instant liquidity shock. The newly added 533.2 BTC transferred to Binance, nominally valued at about 34.52 million USD, represents a large source of active selling pressure on a single trading day, and combined with multiple media reports that "Bhutan continues to reduce holdings," it is more likely to amplify the market's psychological perception of "official selling" in the short term, increasing the subjective concerns of high-position holders about downside risks.
Research materials also indicate that large sell-offs by sovereign governments change supply more at the margin and are unlikely to single-handedly sway Bitcoin's medium to long-term trends. Current prices remain at relatively high levels and are in a state of oscillation, with the market concurrently digesting multi-source selling pressure from miners, long-term holders, and sovereign addresses, with trends still dependent on macro liquidity, halving cycles, and institutional demand among various factors. Bhutan's continuous reduction from this address within a year should be viewed as an important marginal clue on the supply side rather than being exaggerated as the sole trigger for market turning points, and investors need to calibrate the actual weight of such sovereign actions within the overall market structure.
Sovereign players adjusting their portfolios: what signals to watch next
The significant reduction by the Bhutan-related address over the course of a year, with approximately 1,750 BTC still remaining, is sufficient to indicate that sovereign nations incorporating Bitcoin into their asset portfolios do not equate to unconditional long-term locking; timing reductions and phased reallocations are more likely to become the norm in the future. For investors, when assessing the Bitcoin supply side, in addition to miner sell pressure and institutional builds, the inflows and outflows of identifiable sovereign addresses such as El Salvador, Bhutan, and the United States should also be included at the same observational level. The next key points to track are whether this address of Bhutan continues to transfer BTC to exchanges and whether there are directional changes in the on-chain movements and public policy statements of related addresses from other countries. Considering the current limited information regarding the fiscal and policy details behind Bhutan's reductions and the fact that the country has yet to officially confirm address ownership and specific strategies, any claims that exaggerate it as a "national selling wave" or a long-term top signal must be based on subsequently verifiable on-chain data and new public materials.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
