On June 24, 2026, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission presented an annual report that could redraw the regulatory landscape: in the latest Asset and Wealth Management Report, the regulator summarized the past year of Hong Kong's capital market with a set of striking numbers — the total value of assets managed by funds registered in Hong Kong grew by 19.4% in one year, reaching approximately HKD 2.3 trillion; as of the end of March 2026, the daily trading volume of ETFs and leveraged and inverse products recognized by the SFC soared to about HKD 38.1 billion, marking a year-on-year increase of approximately 50.6%, with the total market value of related products rising to about HKD 651.2 billion, an increase of about 25.2%. Among them, the market value of single stock leveraged and inverse products expanded approximately 60 times within a year, indicating that high-risk tools are being rapidly pushed into larger pools of capital. Unlike before, in this official document that showcases AUM and product expansion with quantitative data, "investment funds, digital assets, and the stock market have all achieved significant growth" were written together in the same narrative, marking the first time that digital assets have been treated on par with traditional assets in the mainstream regulatory narrative of Hong Kong's consolidation of its international financial center status. This not only confirms the phase of the licensing and guideline system over the past three years but also indicates that a new round of regulatory competition surrounding digital asset ETFs, leveraged products, and licensed platforms has officially been put on the table by the SFC.

Regulatory Report Card: Digital Assets Enter Mainstream Statements

When the SFC listed "investment funds, digital assets, and the stock market" as the three major growth sectors driving Hong Kong's international financial center status in this annual Asset and Wealth Management Report, it essentially completed a rewrite of the regulatory narrative: digital assets are no longer a footnote attached to risk warnings but are viewed as an asset class on the same report card as public funds and stocks. The report simultaneously presented quantitative indicators such as a 19.4% growth in managed assets of funds to about HKD 2.3 trillion and an increase in daily trading volume of ETFs and leveraged and inverse products to about HKD 38.1 billion, officially acknowledging in a very "mainstream" regulatory report that digital asset-related products have exerted a quantifiable impact on overall AUM and trading structure, leaving a statistical and narrative basis for any future tightening or expansion of policies surrounding that sector.

More critically, the inclusion of digital assets in this "mainstream report" goes beyond a conceptual level and aligns directly with existing licensing and product frameworks. The SFC itself is the licensing and regulatory authority for local asset managers, ETFs, and other collective investment schemes, and since 2023 has established a dedicated licensing and guidance system for virtual asset trading platforms and asset management activities involving virtual assets, further integrating spot ETFs that are based on cryptocurrencies into its recognized ETF system in 2024. Now, when these products are included in the annual regulatory report, the implication becomes clear: any institution wishing to conduct business related to digital asset funds, ETFs, or platforms in Hong Kong can only operate under the existing securities regulatory framework of the SFC and must comply with suitability, information disclosure, and risk control requirements that are on par with complex products, leveraged, and inverse products. The licensing for trading platforms, asset management, and ETF recognition is thus tied together under the same narrative, and the SFC's regulatory discourse in the field of digital assets no longer relies on a "pilot" approach, but has locked this new asset class into the formal system boundaries of Hong Kong's capital market through its annual report card.

Surge of ETFs and Leveraged Products: Risk Appetite or Regulatory Challenge

The numbers provided in the annual report are crystal clear: as of the end of March 2026, the daily trading volume of ETFs and leveraged and inverse products recognized by the SFC soared to about HKD 38.1 billion, a year-on-year increase of about 50.6%; the total market value reached approximately HKD 651.2 billion, which also saw about a 25.2% expansion year-on-year. Even more glaring is the single stock leveraged and inverse products, whose market value expanded approximately 60 times within a year, far exceeding the growth rate of the overall market, suggesting that funds are actively chasing directional and yield-enhancing structural tools within the regulatory framework. When some products are linked to technology stocks, thematic stocks, or even contain elements related to digital assets, this amplification is no longer just the profit and loss of individual investors, but transmits through intensified price volatility and pro-cyclical trading to overall market volatility and potential systemic risk.

For the SFC, this leap in product scale and trading volume itself is a stress test of the existing "complex product" regulatory framework. The regulatory body has long categorized leveraged and inverse products as complex products, requiring intermediaries to conduct additional suitability assessments, risk disclosures, and stress tests before selling to retail customers, with strict limits set on key terms like leverage ratios; for products that involve virtual assets or other high-volatility targets, relevant circulars add more stringent information disclosure, asset selection standards, and risk management arrangements. Now, against the backdrop of rapidly expanding trading volume and market value, the experience of overseas markets "first expanding, then tightening" is almost written in the annals of history — in similar situations, overseas regulators often cool off by tightening distribution rules and raising capital and risk control requirements. Whether Hong Kong will follow a similar trajectory remains to be seen, as it might detail leverage limits, stress test scenario designs, or even redefine which products can be sold to which types of retail customers in subsequent circulars or guidelines, becoming a critical variable to measure the boundaries of risk appetite and regulatory flexibility in the coming period.

HKD 2.3 Trillion in AUM: Who is Obtaining More Fund Licenses?

The total value of managed assets increased by 19.4% in one year, reaching about HKD 2.3 trillion. This number primarily indicates that there has been a significant increase in the number of managers establishing funds in Hong Kong, not just a paper increase due to market price fluctuations. To conduct fund management operations locally, institutions must obtain the SFC’s Type 9 (Asset Management) license, establishing a complete framework that includes internal control, risk management, and compliance functions. The growth of AUM means that more local and multinational institutions are choosing to expand their platforms in Hong Kong — not only adding new product lines but also migrating some strategies, particularly new ETFs and digital asset-related strategies, under regulated entities in Hong Kong. The spot ETFs approved in 2024 that are based on cryptocurrencies are a typical combination of "incremental licenses + new products": those who obtain compliance pathways earlier will have better opportunities to share a larger piece of the HKD 2.3 trillion pie.

However, the expansion of AUM does not simply translate into "scale dividends," but rather synchronizes with rising costs of compliance and risk management. As thematic ETFs, cross-asset portfolios, and products containing exposures to digital assets enter the same shelf, licensed institutions must provide more detailed risk profiles at the model, data, and disclosure levels: how to characterize extreme scenarios for highly volatile assets, and how to distinguish the characteristics of complex products to retail and professional investors will directly feed back into regulatory assessments concerning license renewals and the ability to introduce new products. With mechanisms like the Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect still mainly covering stocks and some traditional ETFs, without incorporating products related to digital assets, the SFC is effectively in the position of being the "main gatekeeper" for mainland and overseas funds — on one hand, by recognizing which ETFs and collective investment schemes can be distributed in Hong Kong, it opens up the allocation of Hong Kong-listed equities and fixed income; on the other hand, it must also isolate digital assets and leveraged structures within controllable boundaries through entry standards, suitability requirements, and information disclosure. In the coming years, those who can continue to obtain Type 9 licenses and successfully shelf new strategies on interconnection and local retail channels will likely further expand their base on top of the HKD 2.3 trillion AUM, while regulatory adjustments on product thresholds and risk isolation will dictate the final slots in this licensing competition.

Digital Asset Managers: From Grey Players to Regulated Counterparties

For crypto-native institutions that previously relied on self-custody, anonymous accounts, and high-leverage trading, moving their strategies "into" this HKD 2.3 trillion Hong Kong fund landscape, the first barrier is obtaining a license. Since 2023, the SFC has established dedicated licenses and guidelines for virtual asset trading platforms and asset management activities involving virtual assets, making "issuing funds or ETFs in Hong Kong" no longer a simple shell game: either the institution applies for the relevant asset management and virtual asset activity licenses themselves, configuring digital assets according to the SFC’s circulars in funds or accounts; or they form a consortium with local licensed asset managers, approved virtual asset trading platforms, and compliant custodians, with the licensed party assuming frontline regulatory responsibilities. The first batch of spot ETFs based on cryptocurrencies approved in 2024 further institutionalized this requirement — institutions issuing such products must provide regulatory custodians, audit firms, and transparent valuation methods, completely parting ways with the previous operational logic of "self-custody, self-accounting" on-chain.

The reality after obtaining a license is yet another round of screening. Licensed virtual asset trading platforms are required to establish strict customer due diligence, anti-money laundering, and transaction monitoring mechanisms, and undergo regular regulatory reviews; on the asset management side, this means more compliance positions, independent risk management teams, and the long-term costs of collaborating with traditional financial institutions like banks and trust companies to build custody and settlement links. Additionally, with extra risk assessments, liquidity management, custody arrangements, and annual audits at the fund level, the previously profitable model relying on low labor costs, loose capital constraints, and information asymmetry is forced to give way to "high compliance costs and low rates" of standardized management, with profit margins squeezed out by regulatory red lines. For individual investors, allocating digital assets through regulated channels in Hong Kong is no longer an operation that can be completed with a simple address: account opening requires identity verification and risk tolerance assessment, and purchasing complex products and leveraged or inverse products necessitates additional suitability testing, with transaction records gradually becoming visible under cross-border tax transparency frameworks. Although Hong Kong typically does not impose separate taxes on individual capital gains from securities, institutions and high-frequency traders need to consider corporate profit taxes and reporting obligations, which, combined together, force "high-frequency, high-leverage, anonymous" on-chain behaviors into a regulated counterparty relationship that is "identifiable, traceable, and accountable."

Regulatory Variables After ETF Surge: How Far Can Hong Kong Go?

This annual report released on June 24, 2026, acts as a "conditional pass" handed by the SFC to the market: managed assets of investment funds rising to about HKD 2.3 trillion, market value of ETFs and leveraged and inverse products reaching HKD 651.2 billion, and market value of single stock leveraged and inverse products expanding nearly 60 times, these "significant growths" are officially endorsed, but the condition is that all funds and products must be funneled into a regulated channel that is monitorable and accountable. The real examination lies ahead: first, in the coming years, whether the share of digital assets in overall AUM and ETF pools continues to rise, and whether the regulator will tighten the valve beforehand before it moves from a marginal material to "something not to be ignored"; second, once leveraged and inverse products, especially those linked to digital assets, experience severe volatility or liquidity events, how quickly the SFC will redraw lines with new guidelines, sales restrictions, or individual penalties. The current key uncertainty is reflected in the blank spaces of data and rules — the report did not specify the exact shares of digital assets within the HKD 2.3 trillion and HKD 651.2 billion, while the global regulatory environment is still volatile, and jurisdictions like Singapore and Dubai are also vying for funds with licenses and tax systems, all of which leave Hong Kong with leeway between "maintaining growth" and "preventing risks." Ultimately, how far Hong Kong can go largely depends on the next round of data disclosures, risk events, and regional competition, and how the SFC chooses to shift the red lines in response to the convergence of these factors.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/en/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。