On June 26, 2026, multiple sources indicated that Kraken's parent company, Payward, is sitting at the negotiating table with Aave Group, the operating entity of the Aave protocol, discussing an acquisition deal involving both equity and tokens. According to the preliminary terms disclosed, Payward plans to offer 35,000 ETH as consideration for 250,000 AAVE tokens and 15% ordinary shares of Aave Group, corresponding to an estimated valuation of around $385 million for Aave—this figure currently appears only in a single source and has yet to be cross-verified by more channels. The negotiations are still at ongoing stage, and neither party has provided an official conclusion on whether the transaction will ultimately be successful; however, if this acquisition of a "mixed structure of on-chain assets and physical equity" is realized, Kraken will transition from a traditional matching trading role to a core position in DeFi asset management and protocol governance, potentially marking a turning point for centralized platforms to hold significant stakes and directly engage in decision-making for leading DeFi protocols.

35,000 ETH betting on Aave’s $385 million valuation

Structurally, this is a transaction that exchanges pure on-chain assets for “dual-layer rights”: the consideration is 35,000 ETH, with the goals split into 250,000 AAVE tokens and 15% ordinary shares of Aave Group. The former corresponds to governance and economic rights at the protocol level, while the latter secures operational and brand control at the entity level. Compared to traditional models that only purchase tokens or equities, Payward occupies two entry points in one consideration, effectively betting a basket of ETH on whether Aave's future protocol revenue and company value can amplify synergistically. This “token + equity” mixed structure also implies that regardless of how returns are distributed between token holders and company shareholders in the future, Kraken will have the opportunity to participate.

According to a single public source's estimation, this proposed transaction corresponds to about a $385 million valuation for Aave. In the current DeFi environment, such a multi-hundred million dollar pricing is seen, on one hand, as recognition of Aave's market share and brand awareness as a leading lending protocol, while on the other hand carries a clear exploratory tint due to the lack of more cross-validation: due diligence is still in process, terms may still be adjusted, making it difficult for the community to regard this figure as the "official market value." For the Aave ecosystem and token holders, this feels more like an evolving valuation gauge—if the final transaction approaches this level, it will be interpreted as a significant centralized platform willing to exchange large amounts of ETH for exposure to Aave’s future cash flow and governance rights; if the terms change significantly or the valuation retracts, it will reinforce the market's perception that DeFi blue chips need to be repriced in the new cycle. Under the premise that terms are not finalized and valuations lack multiple verifications, this attempt to exchange 35,000 ETH for tokens and equity is more seen as an emerging valuation anchor rather than a predetermined conclusion written into Aave's ecosystem narrative.

Kraken's entry into DeFi asset management via Aave

For Kraken, having its parent company Payward present to exchange 35,000 ETH for Aave Group's 15% ordinary shares and 250,000 AAVE is not simply a "speculative blue-chip allocation," but rather an exploration shifting towards DeFi asset management, along its compliance and institutional background. Over the past years, Kraken has built its business framework around regulatory permissions and institutional services in its global expansion; in the context of traditional finance, it is more akin to a "compliant matching platform." When such a role choice takes concentrated exposure to the core equity and tokens of DeFi lending's leading protocols, it indicates that Kraken hopes to build a more controllable bridge between regulated clients and decentralized returns and governance in the future.

From an asset perspective, ordinary shares allow Kraken to access governance at the company level of Aave Group and potential cash flow distributions, while AAVE tokens anchor governance and economic rights of the on-chain protocol itself. This "dual-layer asset" structure reserves space for designing products targeting different customer segments: for institutional clients, it can be interpreted as equity participation in the "DeFi infrastructure operator" within a compliance framework; for retail participants, the exposure through AAVE and related services can be packaged as a composite exposure to access the DeFi lending ecosystem. Although both parties have yet to provide official details on future product forms or specific business lines, if this step is realized, it will objectively push Kraken from merely providing matching trading as a centralized platform to transitioning towards integrating resources around DeFi protocols, offering comprehensive crypto financial services.

The balance of Aave governance: Concerns over CEX shareholders joining

If Payward acquires about 15% of Aave Group's ordinary shares as per the draft negotiation and alongside the accompanying acquisition of AAVE tokens, this leading centralized platform will no longer just be an external partner to the protocol but will directly enter Aave’s ecosystem as part of the “shareholder layer.” The concern is that there has been no public disclosure regarding whether this portion of the equity is tied to board positions, whether it comes with veto rights or information priority rights; Aave's on-chain governance remains nominally led by the community and token holders. For many long-term participants in governance, the biggest worry is not the single percentage figure but the risk appetite, product roadmap, and compliance considerations that might flow back into protocol governance due to the influence of a compliance-oriented, complex CEX becoming a significant shareholder.

Such caution is not unfounded, as the DeFi community has already debated the issue of “too much centralized institutional ownership dilutes community power.” This transaction is still at the negotiation stage, and all impacts on governance are merely projections and assumptions, but several key variables are worth continued tracking: whether the shareholder agreement is ultimately disclosed, whether ordinary shares correspond to specific board positions and voting mechanisms, whether AAVE positions and on-chain addresses will be transparently marked, and whether voting behaviors on key issues, such as risk parameters and asset lists, will show a style switch. These unresolved variables will determine whether Kraken's stake is merely a financial investment or a pivotal turning point that rewrites Aave's governance structure.

CEX investment in DeFi: A continuation after Coinbase

Placing Kraken's acquisition of Aave back into a longer industry timeline, this is not an unexpected "cross-border romance," but a continuation of CEX capital entering the equity and token layers of DeFi protocols. Prior to this, there were already cases of centralized platforms participating in equity or token investments in DeFi projects, with Coinbase's early support for projects including Compound being one pathway for traditional licensed institutions and on-chain finance to tentatively converge: on one side is a public company, custody, and compliance framework; on the other side are open protocols centered around token governance and smart contracts, with both establishing a relationship of mutual leverage while maintaining distance through investment, listing, and technical collaboration. The negotiations between Kraken's parent company Payward and Aave Group around 35,000 ETH, 250,000 AAVE, and 15% ordinary shares take this a step further by directly binding CEX's balance sheet with equity and token positions of DeFi protocols, upgrading "support" to potential deep holdings.

This shareholding structure also brings regulatory perspectives into play. So far, regulators have not publicly commented on this potential transaction, and it remains uncertain whether relevant approvals are necessary and when they might be advanced, yet the trend of licensed CEX entering DeFi equity has already begun to reshape the discussion paradigm of industry power structure: one side is focused on whether the independence and openness of leading projects like Aave can be maintained once CEX capital becomes an important shareholder, while the other believes that the integration of traditional finance and on-chain finance requires closer ties at the capital level. Regardless of how regulators respond in the future, such transactions will continuously test a core proposition—whether DeFi protocols can still maintain open boundaries oriented towards all on-chain participants in governance and product paths under the deep involvement of centralized shareholders.

Negotiations not yet settled: What signals to watch for next

As of June 26, 2026, the proposed transaction of exchanging 35,000 ETH for 250,000 AAVE and 15% ordinary shares of Aave Group remains in negotiation phase, with neither party confirming the deal nor announcing its termination, and the specifics of the terms negotiation and due diligence are publicly blank, even the estimated $385 million valuation is merely a reference figure from a single source rather than a priced consensus. The signals that are truly worth focusing on moving forward are not the sentiment of the secondary market, but rather several clear timelines: whether a formally signed final agreement emerges, how Kraken's boundary as a potential significant shareholder is delineated in governance rights allocation and information disclosure mechanisms, and how the Aave ecosystem adjusts protocol governance and product trajectory under the new shareholder structure. Looking further ahead, if this acquisition materializes, it will push CEX and DeFi from "business cooperation" towards "deep binding of capital and governance," potentially reshaping the valuation methodology of leading protocols and the power structure of on-chain asset management; even if it ultimately does not succeed, it will still serve as an important sample to observe the evolving relationship between centralized platforms and DeFi protocols.

Join our community, let's discuss, and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。