On June 2, 2026, newly appointed Federal Reserve Chair Kashkari sent a long letter to more than 20,000 employees. In this internal letter, he made his first commitment to foster an "open and clear" discussion around the Federal Reserve's strategy, policies, and operational methods, adopting a tone of a system designer rather than a critic. He announced the establishment of a series of special working groups focused on key aspects of monetary policy implementation—this was his first systematic outline of a reform roadmap since taking office, and many traders viewed it as the formal start of the Federal Reserve's "framework self-evaluation period." Since then, every mention of "more details to be announced in the coming weeks" has no longer been just internal governance news but has been treated as a signal that the path of interest rates, the boundaries of the toolbox, and even the logic of forward guidance may change. As of June 29, the specific design of the working groups remained blank, leaving the market to speculate on this potential framework rewrite under incomplete information: interest rate futures are trying to guess a new equilibrium between nominal and real rates, risk assets are recalibrating their tolerated volatility ranges, and the typically sensitive BTC and ETH to real rates, dollar liquidity, and macro uncertainties have preliminarily treated this "letter on the eve of reform" as a core macro variable that needs pricing through perpetual contracts, options, and on-chain dollar stock structure.

Kashkari's Reform Roadmap: From External Criticism to Internal Rewrite

Before entering the Federal Reserve building, Kashkari long stood outside, firing shots at the framework itself—not arguing about a specific rate hike or a round of easing, but repeatedly questioning whether the existing policy framework of the Federal Reserve still fits the current macro environment. From a single source, he has never advocated for "patching up the existing template," but rather a more radical institutional reconstruction. This posture made him seem more like an "external reviewer" before taking office, rather than the new chair ready to use the old operating manual.

On June 2, 2026, when this former "external critic" issued an internal letter as Chair to more than 20,000 employees, actively committing to promote an open and clear discussion about the Federal Reserve's strategy, policy, and operations, the role had quietly transitioned. According to a single source, this letter is seen as his first systematic internal reform roadmap since taking office, and the series of special working groups announced at the same time—clearly defined to focus on five areas that play a critical role in the wide implementation of monetary policy—served as a way for him to concretize past "outside-in" criticisms into "inside-out" rule rewriting efforts. The working groups are positioned to cover key aspects from strategy formulation to specific operational execution, meaning that the reform is no longer just limited to slogan-like "reflection," but directly targets the underlying structure of decision-making processes and external communication: the future Federal Reserve might not only replace a set of dot plots or wording in press releases but change how judgments are formed and how paths are expressed, which is precisely where interest rates and liquidity expectations are read and priced in the market.

Loosening of Interest Rate Reaction Functions: Re-evaluation of Volatility Premiums

When Kashkari no longer only criticized the framework in academic conferences, but promised in the June 2 internal letter to engage in open discussions on "strategy, policy, and operations," institutionalizing this commitment through special working groups, interest rate traders read not a family letter but five words: the reaction function needs to change. For the market, once strategies and operations are laid out on the table, the past empirical formula of "a certain set of inflation and employment data → roughly infer a dot plot and path" will no longer be reliable, and forward guidance will shift from being an anchor to a variable. The same data in the future could correspond to entirely different policy paths, and this "framework uncertainty" will be directly reflected in the yield curve: to compensate for this additional risk, term premiums and policy uncertainty premiums typically rise, and the implied volatility of U.S. Treasuries and swaps also increases. The "Taper Tantrum" in 2013, triggered by the expectation of reducing bond purchases, serves as a template—just a discussion about the pace of asset purchases was enough to dramatically reprice long-term yields in a short time. This time, however, what Kashkari is touching is a higher-level combination of "strategy + operations," and until June 29, when the details of the working groups remain undisclosed, the market can only pay for this unquantifiable new institutional range with higher volatility and thicker risk premiums.

Once the structure of interest rates and volatility is rewritten, it transmits to high-beta assets through two familiar lines: real yields and dollar liquidity. An increase in interest rate term premiums typically pushes up real yields; under unchanged conditions, this means the opportunity cost of holding cash flow-less assets rises, while increased uncertainty in real yields will compress leverage and risk budgets, which is particularly unfriendly to assets that need to continuously "tell stories." Historical experience shows that BTC and ETH are usually under pressure during rapid rises in real yields and when expectations of dollar liquidity tightening are reinforced, while they tend to perform better when real yields decline and market bets on a clear easing path. Now, once traders begin to treat "Kashkari's reform" as a new volatility factor, the repricing of interest rate volatility will more quickly reflect in the cryptocurrency market: the implied volatility of perpetual contracts and options will closely follow U.S. Treasury volatility as amplifiers, and the stock of on-chain dollar assets and interest rates will be used to trade ahead in the direction of future policy combinations, while the movements of BTC and ETH will increasingly resemble a joint vote on these two variables: "real yields × framework uncertainty."

Cracks in Dollar Credibility and Crypto Safe-Haven Narrative

When the top levels of the Federal Reserve wrote "open and clear discussions" about the Federal Reserve's strategy and operations in an internal letter, the market read not just an administrative slogan. Some investors might interpret this as a signal that the dollar system has entered a "self-examination phase": such a level of review and such wording are only needed when the existing framework is no longer reassuring. Kashkari has publicly criticized the existing framework multiple times; now, promoting working groups to reassess key aspects from strategy to operations in his capacity as Chair can easily be interpreted by owners of dollar assets as—this currency governance machine they rely on is no longer so confident that the old script is safe enough. For some macro traders, interest rates and exchange rates are no longer just economic variables but proxies for "institutional quality."

In the narrative systems of the crypto community and macro hedge funds, such institutional uncertainty will naturally amplify an old proposition: sovereign currencies have governance risks, and BTC/ETH as decentralized assets can hedge against them. During the post-2020 easing cycle, Bitcoin was once packaged as an asset to hedge against fiat currency expansion; amidst multiple rounds of uncertain events like the pandemic shock and regional bank pressures, BTC/ETH was frequently used as a policy hedging position. If Kashkari's reform is viewed as another bet on the dollar's governance model, this thread of "currency hedging" will be revisited: long leverage on perpetual contracts, options skews, and the duration allocation of on-chain dollar-denominated assets will all adjust around one question—will BTC/ETH be viewed as insurance against institutional cracks, or should they be reclassified as high-beta risk assets? Ultimately, the effectiveness largely depends on the outcome of the reform: if the working group leads to higher transparency and more stable expectation management, then dollar credibility will repair, and the safe-haven premium of BTC/ETH will be compressed; but if the reform process deepens external impressions of political intervention and internal division, macro funds will have more reason to pay for "dollar governance tail risks," and the pricing structure of BTC/ETH will more closely resemble long-term insurance rates against these tail risks.

Trading Platforms Pricing Federal Reserve Divergences On-Chain

When the details of Kashkari's working group are still pending, but expectations of "the framework potentially being rewritten" have begun to spread, the first entities starting to speculate on divergent paths are often not Wall Street's bond desks but the 7×24 hour operating crypto derivatives markets. The old script before the FOMC is playing out again: the basis and funding rates of BTC/ETH perpetual contracts loosen first, and often, it is not spot prices that rise in the short term, but implied volatility of options—traders use more expensive short-term options to hedge against the jump risk of "unexpected reform communication," while simultaneously pushing down long-end volatility in the term structure, betting that Kashkari's reform will ultimately fall within some kind of "predictable rules." Interest rate swaps and federal funds futures trade during business days, while BTC/ETH perpetuals and options transact as usual over the weekends, becoming a medium for expressing macro views on "whether rate cuts will happen faster or slower, and whether divergences will become greater or smaller."

The oscillation of interest rate and regulatory expectations is also reshuffling the trajectory of on-chain dollars. When the dollar-denominated rates rise and more cautious regulatory attitudes dominate, off-market funds are more willing to leave idle dollars in coupon-bearing assets like Treasuries and money market funds, slowing the growth of demand for on-chain dollar tools, with more on-chain stock being used as "bridge assets" for cross-border settlements and off-market payments, rather than margin for continuous leveraging. Conversely, when the market bets that Kashkari's reform will create a more easing environment or a more frequent use of "unconventional tools," demand for on-chain dollars will accelerate again, with some funds redeemed from money market products coming in through off-market channels, quickly rotating between core liquid assets like BTC/ETH and high-beta altcoins: first piling into BTC/ETH to capture the first round of repricing of "macro beta," and then opportunistically spilling into high-volatility tokens to amplify gains. The more ambiguous the direction of Kashkari's working group and the larger the imaginative space for internal divergences, the more intense this "mainstream first, long-tail later" on-chain rotation will be, with BTC/ETH acting as the primary pricing layer for reform expectations, their volatility and pricing mismatch becoming the most intuitive window into how the market absorbs the Federal Reserve's divergences.

Focusing on Working Group Details: Chips for the Next Round of Macro Narrative

Kashkari's internal letter and the series of special working groups put forth are not simply expressions of "more hawkish/more dovish" monetary policy stance, but rather a preview of a potential "framework-level re-evaluation" that could rewrite reaction functions. Currently, before the details are disclosed, what the crypto market should really focus on is not speculating on the names of the five areas, but rather judging whether the working group will touch on three main lines: firstly, will the policy objectives themselves be reordered, thus changing the tolerance range of interest rate paths; secondly, whether balance sheet management will be included in core discussions, implying that the medium-term supply curve of dollar liquidity needs to be redrawn; thirdly, if communication transparency and decision-making procedures are adjusted, will the market's reliance on the old script of "dot plots - meetings - speeches" weaken. On the trading and research levels, the roadmap is clear: before and after the detail disclosure, compare the repricing of U.S. Treasury yield curves and the dollar index, systematically track whether the correlation of BTC/ETH with real yields and dollar movements shows structural changes, and observe whether the dislocation of volatility, term basis, and cross-asset correlations can be corrected, thereby determining whether this round of the new framework is merely a spike of sentiment or a systemic-level factor that will continue to bear down on the pricing of crypto assets throughout the cycle. This is the real test of whether Kashkari's reform narrative can transform from a story into a pricing constraint.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Exclusive AiCoin Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive AiCoin Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/en/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。