On September 5, 2025, as the issuer of USDY, Ondo Finance suddenly broke its usual rhythm of "multi-network expansion": the official announcement stated that it would adjust the minting strategy of USDY on certain networks, specifically naming Aptos and the Noble network in the Cosmos ecosystem as the first chains to be affected, and previewed that it would provide migration and exit arrangements for existing holders. Three days later, on September 8, this decision was officially implemented, with Ondo halting the new minting of USDY on Aptos and Noble, effectively pausing what was once viewed as a symbol of "cross-ecosystem accessibility" for RWA products at these two nodes. More critically, the USDY on Osmosis and Mantra, which relies on Noble and IBC bridging for supply, faced a tightening of its inflow as the minting on Noble was halted. Meanwhile, other supported networks were explicitly marked by Ondo as operating "normally." The announcement repeatedly emphasized that USDY is always fully backed by sufficient reserves, attempting to stabilize asset safety and credit expectations, while also shrinking the issuance network, balancing compliance and operational efficiency within the same framework, forcing cross-chain users and those focused on RWA narratives around U.S. Treasury yields to rethink their stance: at the turning point from "multi-chain expansion" to "selected networks," who remains within this landscape represents a new selection of risks and opportunities.
From Multi-Chain Expansion to Contraction: A Turn in the USDY Path
USDY was initially shaped as a channel to "bring U.S. Treasury yields on-chain": issued by Ondo Finance, it was a tokenized yield-bearing asset based on U.S. Treasury yields, explicitly defined as an RWA product. In the early narratives, multi-network issuance was almost its natural partner—Ondo deliberately adopted a multi-network strategy to distribute USDY across several chains, including Aptos and Noble, with the intention of allowing users from different public chain ecosystems to access the same type of offshore yields, transforming "cross-ecosystem accessibility" into a part of the product's competitiveness. Leveraging Noble as a native asset of the Cosmos ecosystem and the IBC hub network, USDY could also be carried and cross-chain distributed to application networks like Osmosis and Mantra, making multi-chain expansion appear to be a high-priority growth path at that time.
The turning point occurred in September 2025. In the announcement on September 5, Ondo previewed an adjustment to the minting strategy of USDY on certain networks, specifically naming Aptos and Noble as affected, and subsequently, from September 8, it halted new USDY minting on these two chains, effectively cutting off new supply entering Aptos, Noble, and through Noble and IBC bridging to Osmosis and Mantra. Meanwhile, Ondo declared that the operation of USDY on other supporting networks would not be affected and continuously emphasized that USDY is always fully backed by sufficient reserves. Furthermore, it provided migration and exit arrangements for existing holders, yet did not provide any single, decisive explanation in the public information. Viewed in the larger context of the RWA industry, these actions seem more like a project team's reassessment of underlying network choices after multi-chain layouts, attempting to find a new balance between compliance expectations and operational efficiency. This turn from expansion to contraction of USDY itself becomes a clear reference point for observing the RWA transition into the "selected network era."
Aptos and Noble Halting Minting: Which Funds Are Stuck Along the Way
When Ondo officially stopped the USDY minting functions on Aptos and Noble on September 8, 2025, the real entities "stuck along the way" were the new funds that should have continuously flowed into these networks. For Aptos, halting minting means that no more incremental USDY can directly enter this chain from the issuance side, and new users can no longer acquire these RWA assets based on U.S. Treasury yields natively on-chain, relying instead on existing stock to circulate repeatedly in the secondary market. Noble's role is even more critical; not only is it the native asset issuer within the Cosmos ecosystem and the IBC hub network, but it also serves as a distribution channel for USDY across chains. Once Noble stops minting, the entire supply pipeline "from Ondo to Cosmos" effectively has its upstream valve shut off.
The closure of this valve's chain reaction directly impacts networks like Osmosis and Mantra, which rely on Noble and IBC to obtain USDY. They were not technically "cut off" from existing positions, but all new supplies were locked out: Osmosis and Mantra no longer receive new USDY from Noble and can only internally reallocate existing stocks that came in through cross-chain means, with liquidity expansion subjected to strict constraints. Importantly, this "halt in minting" targets increment but does not deny existing assets. Ondo repeatedly emphasized in its announcement that USDY has always been fully backed by sufficient reserves throughout the process, and operations of USDY on other supported networks remained unaffected by this adjustment. Official information also indicated that it had provided existing holders with migration and exit arrangements, although specific execution details have not been disclosed publicly. In other words, what has been cut off are the future supply pathways to certain networks, rather than the credit of currently existing assets, indicating that the nature of this event is more about route contraction and network selection rather than a brutal abandonment of funds on specific chains.
Embarrassing Migration for Cross-Chain Users: Where Is the Exit
Those truly caught in an awkward position are users who do not have USDY directly on the Noble chain but hold it via IBC. Market makers on Osmosis and participants in yield strategies on Mantra, many viewed USDY as a "low-volatility yield leg" to fit into their portfolios. Now hearing the key signal of "halt in minting," they find themselves positioned in the middle of the cross-chain path: assets remain fully supported, but the pathway to continue expanding positions on this chain has been closed, and the official migration and exit arrangements have not yet been disclosed in an actionable detail. This information asymmetry has led to various discussions, with some advocating for an early reduction, exchanging USDY back for local assets, while others prefer to observe, waiting for Ondo to provide clearer migration guidance.
From Ondo's perspective, at least one thing can be confirmed: existing holders are not "locked" in the original network; a framework for migration and exit has been pre-established, but critical parameters such as the time window, target network, exchange ratio, and fee responsibility are all left blank in the current briefing. For cross-chain assets, common exit routes usually fall into two categories—either returning along the original bridging path to redeem or exchange assets on the source network, or accepting the migration plan offered by the official to move assets to other still-supported networks—both options imply multiple transaction steps, cross-network coordination, and cost considerations. When Noble adjusts its strategy as an IBC hub, holders on networks like Osmosis and Mantra must make choices amidst these structural challenges: to withdraw early under uncertain specifics or to bet on the future migration design being smooth enough. This choice itself is reshaping their risk perception and patience boundaries concerning cross-chain RWA products.
Compliance and Efficiency Tug-of-War: How RWA Chooses Networks
As holders weigh between migration and exit, the issuer is also making another layer of choices: which networks are worth continuing to support a tokenized yield-bearing asset based on U.S. Treasury yields. RWA projects inherently face two sets of constraints, one from the real-world compliance of underlying assets and another from the friendliness of issuing networks towards regulation and institutional participation. As the issuer of USDY, Ondo Finance previously adopted a multi-network issuance strategy, enhancing cross-ecosystem accessibility of the product across multiple chains, including Aptos and Noble. However, in the announcement on September 5, 2025, they clearly stated that starting from September 8, they would cease USDY minting on the Aptos and Noble networks within the Cosmos ecosystem while retaining support across other networks, making the "network selection" shift from an abstract consideration to a concrete contraction action.
From industry commonality to derive such decisions, several intertwined dimensions can be observed. The first is the compliance environment: RWA projects need to assess how different networks match with real-world legal and auditing requirements, which ecosystems facilitate cooperation with institutions, and which network governance and infrastructure are better suited for carrying assets linked to Treasury yields, but these remain at a general level of consideration rather than qualitative judgment of any single chain. The second is cost and complexity: while multi-network issuance certainly increases asset accessibility, it simultaneously raises the complexity of compliance review, technical maintenance, and user support; each additional chain adds long-term investment in node operation, bridging connections, and customer education. The third is the distribution of users and liquidity: the Cosmos ecosystem distributes USDY to networks like Osmosis and Mantra through Noble and IBC, while emerging public chain ecosystems meet demand through their respective application scenarios. Project parties must repeatedly reassess which networks still have strategic significance for incremental minting. Currently, there is no specific reason disclosed in public information for Ondo's halting of USDY minting on Aptos and Noble, and the outside world can only interpret this "selective network contraction" within the above commonality framework: under the premise that USDY is always fully supported by adequate reserves and arrangements for migration and exit are prepared for existing holders, narrowing the supported networks could potentially gain a concentration advantage in risk management and operational efficiency, also indicating that the multi-chain RWA strategy is likely to revert from broad expansion to a select few carefully considered networks as it matures.
After Halting Minting: The Next Move for USDY and Multi-Chain RWA
The halting of minting for Aptos and Noble first concentrated the impact on these two chains and existing holders on Osmosis and Mantra connected through Noble and IBC: new supply has been cut off, and migration and exit have become unavoidable practical choices, while USDY on other supporting networks, according to official statements, continues to operate normally. With the repeated emphasis that it is "always fully backed by sufficient reserves", the overall credit expectation has not been directly overturned; it feels more like a contraction adjustment at the network level. For the cross-chain ecosystem, this event has weakened accessibility on certain paths but has shifted the narrative around RWA multi-chain from "as many chains as possible" to "selective multi-chain." In the future, USDY is likely to continue digging into liquidity and application scenarios around still-supported networks, adopting a more cautious approach toward compliance and cost when increasing network involvement—but such judgments remain at a directional deduction rather than confirmed conclusions. Public information has yet to disclose the scale of migration, user distribution, or market price performance; the discussions within the industry regarding the multi-chain layout of RWA projects have turned more specific as a result: readers interpreting Ondo's halting need to strictly distinguish between "confirmed network adjustments and reserve status" and "speculations around compliance, demand, and operational costs," viewing it as a strategic pivot case that is unfolding and will require time to test its long-term impacts.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
