Reviewing this round of new trading and launching platforms, I increasingly feel:
The core factor that determines whether a platform can succeed is often just one:
Does it have the ability to pull in the "conspiracy groups" and keep them active?
Products can iterate.
Mechanisms can replicate.
If the interface is not user-friendly, it can be improved over time.
Even the founder at the forefront doesn't have to be a big figure.
These are not the most difficult aspects.
The real challenge is:
Can resources be found?
Can assets be launched continuously?
Can investors make money here?
Can new topics be continuously created to keep funds, attention, and operational teams on the platform?
The most valuable function of a launching platform has never been the "create token" button.
It is the ability to bring people, money, content, liquidity, and exit channels to the same table.
Why do many platforms with seemingly good mechanisms end up with no players?
Because mechanisms can only attract researchers.
The money-making effect is what attracts investors.
Investors will not feel secure moving their funds and resources because your document is eighty pages long.
What they truly care about is:
Is there liquidity here?
Is there someone to take over?
Is there capability for spreading the word?
Are there exit channels?
Did those who came before make money?
Therefore, for a new platform to cold start, apart from offline resource pulling, there is only one most effective method:
Create a high market cap project first.
It can be a project with a product, or it can be a meme.
As long as it really runs, it can simultaneously prove three things:
The platform has liquidity.
The platform can generate attention.
Investors have the opportunity to make money and safely exit here.
This high market cap project is not the result after the ecosystem matures.
On the contrary, it is usually the starting point of the ecosystem's real launch.
With the first profitable model, other teams will come over.
Only when someone comes to issue tokens will users come to trade.
As users and liquidity increase, it will attract stronger teams.
Finally forming a flywheel:
Platform pulls resources → Strong teams issue assets → Project achieves market cap → Investors make money → More resources and teams come in.
According to this logic, the newly validated launching platforms include:
Pons and LONG on Robinhood Chain.
STONK on Solana.
They may not have won the final battle yet.
But at least they have proved one thing to the market with high attention projects:
This platform is not just about issuing tokens.
There are indeed people doing business here, and there are indeed people making money.
So in the future, when judging a new launching platform, don't just look at whether the mechanism is new, whether the page is beautiful, or how many fans the founder has.
Look at four things first:
Who is issuing assets on it.
Who is supporting it from behind.
Who is responsible for generating spreading.
Is there a high market cap target that the market remembers?
Products determine whether the platform is usable.
The money-making effect determines whether people are willing to come.
A platform that allows people to issue tokens can only be considered a tool.
Only when a group of people can continuously come over to do business and repeatedly make money can it have the opportunity to become an ecosystem.
I continue to recommend everyone register for FOMO, you can use my link to reduce some fees:
https://fomo.family/r/duanwangye66
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
