Author: DogPay

The life of digital nomads is often described as a kind of freedom: living in Chiang Mai, clients in New York, projects in Singapore, money coming from all over the globe, and living costs reduced through geographical arbitrage.

But beneath freedom, dilemmas can arise at any moment.

When you try to renew your Anthropic subscription at a café, your card gets declined. You swap it for another, it gets declined again. You borrow a friend’s card, and this time it goes through. The next day, your account gets suspended. Or on a lighter note: your ChatGPT subscription keeps failing even after you’ve swapped cards multiple times, stuck on the checkout page.

You think the issue lies in the network, risk controls, or just bad luck. In reality: there are problems with the issuing institution in places you can’t see, and your U card does not have a bank account that belongs to you.

On July 29, 2026, stablecoin issuer Kulipa ceased operations due to solvency issues. The card projects of about 20 wallets and fintech clients, including Solflare, Ready, and Flutterwave, were simultaneously interrupted. Virtual and physical cards from Solflare became invalid on July 28; Ready's announcement merely stated that the issuer was winding down. Many users only realized their cards were unusable when they failed to process transactions.[1]

Less than six months before Kulipa’s shutdown, it had just completed a $6.2 million seed round led jointly by Flourish Ventures and 1kx. A16z crypto’s stablecoin infrastructure map released in April even listed Kulipa as an issuer to watch. Three months later, the company was gone.[2]

This is not an isolated case. In the first half of 2026, Polish regulators revoked Quicko’s payment license, and 13 days later, three different regional crypto cards simultaneously became invalid: CEX.IO Card, Trustee Plus, IN1. Mastercard shut down UnCash's non-KYC card, and UnCash itself stated that this was a fatal blow to its operational capability.[3]

None of these companies failed due to poor products, nor did they lose all their users. They failed in the same way: reliance on rented licenses.

A Visa or Mastercard that can be used globally must be issued by a licensed bank or electronic money institution. Most crypto companies are not Principal Members; they can only rent the BIN, which refers to the issuing rights associated with the first six digits of the card number. This arrangement is called BIN sponsorship: crypto companies handle branding, wallets, and user support, while the properly licensed bank remains behind the scenes, responsible for compliance, settlement, and card organization relationships.

This arrangement is outlined in the cardholder agreement, which nearly no one reads. Your card bears a crypto brand, the platform you registered on is another app, and the bank that decides whether the card can be used is one you’ve never signed any agreement with. An institution that never appears on the card holds the switch to your payments.

If the licensed entity wants to exit, gets its license revoked, or collapses first, the cards will be shut down within days. The notifications users receive usually consist of a regulatory announcement and a customer service page.

In the second quarter of FY 2026, Visa’s stablecoin settlement volume reached an annualized run rate of $20 billion, which was only one-fifteenth of what it was a year ago. There are over 160 active stablecoin card projects globally. At the same time: Kulipa shut down, Fiat24 paused crypto top-ups and account openings, Quicko's license was revoked, and UnCash was shut down by Mastercard.[4]

Analyst Romeo Fardeen from Alea Research reflected on Kulipa, stating that the true moat in payments is the license; Kulipa adopted a light model by not handling money and renting licenses, essentially a survival model: relying on growth to sustain itself, hoping for the next round of funding to buy a license.[5]

Card processing margins are quite thin. The interchange for European debit cards is only 0.2%, and it has to be split between the issuing bank, card organization, and processor. Consumer U cards depend on card issuance fees, membership fees, and limited margins, making it hard to cover cashback, KYC, risk control, customer service, issuance, and compliance costs. In the survival model of renting licenses, every layer squeezes profits.[6]

For digital nomads, receiving and spending money are two separate paths

Freelancers’ cross-border payments are already quite expensive. PayPal charges about 4.4% plus a fixed fee for cross-border transactions, and withdrawing to a bank incurs another fee, with exchange rate differences in between. A $5,000 invoice can lose up to about 8% after transaction fees, cross-border surcharges, and currency conversion.[9]

The expenses of digital nomads are mixed: ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro, OpenAI API; AWS, GCP; Notion, Figma, GitHub Copilot; rent, meals, flights. They span online and offline, fiat and stablecoin, subscriptions and one-time payments. A card that can only be used for transactions cannot cover these scenarios.

More importantly, many digital nomads are also freelancers, independent developers, and small entrepreneurs. They need to spend money, but they also need to receive it. Clients may be in the United States, Europe, Southeast Asia, paying via ACH, SWIFT, or stablecoins. The income and expenditure aspects require two separate systems, and each transaction needs more conversions, more withdrawals, and more waiting time.

While crypto cards generally rely on BIN sponsorship, a few card issuers have taken a different route: partnering with regulated U.S. banks to directly embed banking capabilities into their platforms. Dogpay, Plasma, and Redotpay are representatives of this approach.

They rely on so-called crypto-friendly banks for settlement, such as Singapore's DBS and the U.S. Zenus charter bank (Zenus transitioned from C-end digital banking to a U.S. B2B2C embedded banking platform in 2024, providing U.S. dollar accounts, cross-border payments, and Visa issuance through a single API to fintechs, electronic money institutions, currency service businesses, and offshore banks in over 180 countries. It currently has an annualized payment volume run rate of $75 billion, with a monthly total payment volume exceeding $4 billion, serving over 1,300 financial institution clients.[10])

The difference between the two models lies in account ownership. Under BIN sponsorship, users receive mass sub-cards under the company account; the account belongs to the company, and the users are merely cardholders. Under embedded banking, users open U.S. bank accounts in their own names.

This difference directly translates to payment success rates. When risk controls at OpenAI or Anthropic scan the BIN of a mass issuance card pool, they are likely to flag it as high risk; when they scan a real U.S. bank account, they see normal account information. Its core banking structure embeds compliance into every account event and transaction, real-time covering ACH, FedWire, SWIFT, cards, and stablecoins.[11]

In fact, what digital nomads need is not just a more usable card, but a crypto card that integrates receiving, storing, and spending into one line.

A qualified crypto card should have the following characteristics:

Income aspect: clients can directly ACH/Wire to a U.S. bank account in their own name, or use stablecoins through a payment gateway. This avoids multiple layers of conversions for platform receivables, withdrawals, top-ups, and spending.

Holding aspect: multi-currency wallets hold stablecoins and digital currencies, with balances linked to the card for use anytime.

Expenditure aspect: possessing three card segments that cover AI subscriptions, cloud services, SaaS, offline POS, and ATM withdrawals; crypto cards should support Apple Pay and Google Pay.

Acquiring aspect: users pay with stablecoins, merchants accept fiat or digital currencies, with second-level settlements.

Merchant accounts: online applications for U.S. dollar accounts (ACH/Wire), multi-currency accounts in Singapore (SGD/USD/EUR), as well as merchant accounts in Canada and Europe. Settlement networks cover SWIFT, ACH, SEPA, FPS, serving over 140 countries and regions.

Mercuryo also noted another detail: the weekend trading volume of stablecoin withdrawals averages 86% of weekday volumes. Therefore, what users want is not just a good-looking card, but also access to funds even after banking hours.[7]

The card is merely the surface layer. What truly enables continuous payments is the account behind the card: whether it’s under your name, whether it’s supported by a regulated bank, and whether you can continue to use it when the next Kulipa appears.

For digital nomads who receive salaries in stablecoins, rely on AI tools for production, and move between Southeast Asia and Europe, the stability of payment infrastructure isn’t just an experience issue, it’s a matter of whether their business can continue.

Today's digital nomads do not just need a more usable U card, but even more a financial foundation that seamlessly connects real bank accounts, wallets, acquiring, and withdrawals into one line.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。