In September 2026, Michael Saylor, who serves as the Executive Chairman of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) and is also one of the largest Bitcoin holders among publicly traded companies, condensed years of scattered advocacy into a systematic policy document titled "Policy Recommendations for Prosperity in the Digital Economy." This time, he no longer only discusses how companies can purchase Bitcoin but directly "writes a script" for regulators, focusing on building a "Digital Bill of Rights" for the digital asset and AI era: not an additional layer of restrictions, but a clear assertion of the positive rights individuals and businesses should enjoy in creating, issuing, financing, custody, transferring, and using digital assets. Bundled with this bill is his upgraded view of Bitcoin's role—from its early designation as "digital gold" to its current definition as "digital capital," a class of capital assets that can and should appear on bank and insurance balance sheets. In this lengthy article, he calls for allowing banks to custody Bitcoin under clear and operable rules and to issue credit using it as collateral, while opening compliance pathways for insurance companies to include digital capital in their balance sheets and product designs, in conjunction with lowering the financing thresholds for tokens and developing the circulation rules for digital dollars and tokenized securities. All of this is strictly still policy suggestions and industry advocacy rather than any laws or regulatory decisions that have taken effect, and no specific formal response from regulators and legislators has yet been seen; however, it coincides with a global trend of increasing caution and even tightening regulations around the crypto industry: on one side, there is a continuously thickening compliance firewall, and on the other, Saylor's high-profile demand for a "empowering legislative" digital rights framework. This tension elevates his initiative beyond that of an individual or a single company, becoming an unavoidable narrative starting point for whether Bitcoin can truly enter the banking system and broader financial infrastructure in the future.

From Marginal Asset to Digital Capital: Bitcoin's New Identity

In the long-term market narrative, Bitcoin has been positioned as "digital gold"—a highly volatile, tech-driven value storage tool, often regarded as a marginal position in the asset allocation of companies and individuals. Saylor unexpectedly shifted this label in the "Policy Recommendations for Prosperity in the Digital Economy," reclassifying Bitcoin as "Digital Capital," which effectively moves it from the vault to the center of capital structures. His definition of "digital capital" is not abstract but directly points to the balance sheets of banks and insurance companies: Bitcoin should be a capital asset that can be included on the balance sheet, recognized, managed under clear rules, and used as collateral to issue credit. For him, who has already heavily invested in Bitcoin through Strategy's balance sheet, this is not a spectator's conceptual game but an attempt to use his own holding experience to advocate for a new institutional identity for Bitcoin.

Once Bitcoin is redefined from "digital gold" to "digital capital," its role in the mainstream financial system is no longer merely as an external variable of price volatility, but is envisioned as an underlying resource that financial institutions can actively manage: banks can design credit and risk mitigation around it, and insurance companies can design products and duration matching based on it, while regulators must include it in discussions of capital, collateral, and risk weights. The cost of this identity upgrade is that risk perception must shift from "speculative target" to "regulated capital," raising higher demands for compliance, custodial technologies, and prudent regulatory frameworks; while the potential benefit is providing a legitimate and explainable pathway for institutions that are willing to engage with Bitcoin within the rules. Saylor attempts to pull Bitcoin from the regulatory firewall's fringe assets into the capital coordinates that can be systematically evaluated and allocated through the concept of "digital capital."

Imagining Bank Custody and Bitcoin Collateralized Credit

After naming Bitcoin as "digital capital," Saylor naturally pushed the battleground towards traditional banks. He calls directly in the lengthy article: allow banks to custody Bitcoin under "clear and operable regulatory rules" and issue collateralized credit based on it. The narrative logic is very clear—if Bitcoin is no longer merely a static position on a publicly traded company's balance sheet, but is seen in the banking system as a capital asset that can be collateralized, then it can be pledged like real estate or corporate equity in exchange for real-world credit and liquidity. For banks, this means that a new revenue pathway can be established around Bitcoin between custody services and collateral financing, bringing "on-chain assets" that were previously outside of the system into the daily processes of term structure and risk pricing.

Once Bitcoin becomes compliant collateral within this framework, the imaginative space of bank business structures will open up: custody departments will no longer merely safeguard "alternative assets" but will stand at the starting point of a new round of credit product design, while risk control and prudent regulation must write new valuation and risk models that take into account Bitcoin's volatility and on-chain characteristics. For Bitcoin itself, it transforms from a "buy-and-hold" position into a liquidity source that can be repeatedly pledged and refinanced within the bank's balance sheet, where price fluctuations may no longer only represent the gains and losses of speculators but could become a variable in banks' credit expansion and contraction. However, all of this presently remains at the advocacy level: evidence shows that no regulatory body or legislator has yet transformed this recommendation into effective rules, nor responded publicly with related details, under the backdrop of tightening global crypto asset regulation. The banking custody and Bitcoin collateralized credit Saylor envisions remains merely a draft not yet signed off by regulators.

Token Financing, Digital Dollar, and the Rights Puzzle of Insurance

While bank custody and credit are just "sketches," Saylor pushed his vision further in this lengthy article from September 2026 to the earlier stage of "capital formation." He advocates lowering the thresholds for token financing and digital capital generation, allowing more companies and even projects to issue their own digital tokens and digital dollars, directly competing for yield under transparent rules. Unlike traditional regulators who are accustomed to "setting red lines before discussing innovation," he attempts to revert issuance rights, pricing rights, and interest rights back to market participants, using a "Digital Bill of Rights" to define who is qualified to create digital assets, rather than adding additional layers of approval.

After banks, he attempts to connect the balance sheets of insurance companies. The lengthy article explicitly states that insurance institutions should have feasible pathways to include "digital capital" on both the asset and liability sides, allowing them to hold Bitcoin and other digital capital on the asset side while designing new risk protection products around these assets. In his vision, insurance is no longer just about pricing traditional risks associated with homes, vehicles, and personal life; it can also cover scenarios like digital asset custody, loss, hacker attacks, and the underlying capital used for these protections is the on-chain digital capital itself. Complementing this, he emphasizes the need to improve the circulation rules for tokenized securities while protecting financial privacy and identity rights—allowing individuals to enjoy the liquidity of the digital market when holding, trading, and financing without being stripped of their data in every single transaction. These interrelated suggestions are pieced together into a complete digital asset rights system, spanning from token issuance, digital dollar competition, to insurance and tokenized securities, privacy, and identity protection. In this framework, Bitcoin is just one of the core bases of digital capital's puzzle, not the sole protagonist.

AI-Driven 24-Hour Digital Economy

After laying out the rights terrain of token issuance, digital dollar competition, and tokenized securities, Saylor raised his perspective to a longer timeline—no longer limited to discussing a single asset, but a "24/7 digital economy" driven by AI and digital agents that operates around the clock. In his narrative, this economy is filled with automated digital entities: they continuously produce data, facilitate transactions, and optimize resource allocation, yet their rhythm is hampered by the operating hours and compliance processes of traditional financial infrastructure. Therefore, he deliberately ties the digital asset policy framework to productivity gains in the AI era, shaping that "Digital Bill of Rights" as a foundational institution suited for the digital intelligence age, rather than a special exemption for a particular industry.

Within this logic, "more freely creating, financing, owning, and trading assets" is no longer just a demand of the crypto industry but a fundamental need of the 24-hour digital economy: if the generation and flow of capital are still controlled by a handful of intermediaries and approval rhythms, then the efficiency of AI and digital agents will be significantly diminished at the financial level. Thus, Saylor writes digital rights as a foundational infrastructure thread—allowing more entities to issue digital tokens and digital dollars, competing on yields, improving the circulation rules for tokenized securities, while protecting financial privacy and identity rights—attempting to persuade traditional readers that safeguarding these rights lays the pipeline for the entire digital economy rather than seeking a special passage for Bitcoin. Through this narrative of the times, he elevates his policy advocacy from "creating space for crypto" to "preserving the basics for the digital intelligence era," also naturally providing a seemingly legitimate framework for Bitcoin, as "digital capital,” to enter banks and insurance balance sheets, through a narrative linked to overall societal productivity.

Empowerment Legislation and the Bitcoin Game under Tightening Regulations

In the context of a tightening global regulatory atmosphere, Saylor is not asking for another layer of "forbidden lists," but rather a "Digital Bill of Rights" geared towards the digital asset and digital intelligence era, translating legislation from a constraining tool to an empowering framework—allowing individuals and businesses to create, issue, finance, custody, transfer, and use digital assets, letting Bitcoin enter banks and insurance balance sheets as "digital capital" under predictable rules. However, the reality is that as of late September 2026, this lengthy article remains merely a set of publicly available policy suggestions, and no regulatory body or legislator has provided a specific response. Bitcoin's transition from corporate asset allocation to the center of financial institutional balance sheets still faces a whole set of institutional hurdles such as capital classification, risk recognition, and custody responsibilities that have yet to be rewritten. In the policy game beyond 2026, this "Policy Recommendations for Prosperity in the Digital Economy" resembles a discourse bargaining chip: it provides a structured narrative and agenda-setting script for those embracing Bitcoin, and sketches out a pathway that can be discussed, modified, but also cannot be overlooked for hesitant regulators and financial institutions.

Join our community, let's discuss, and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。