On October 13, 2026, at the venue of the American Business Economics Association annual meeting, Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, who is also a voting member of the 2026 FOMC, broke the market's mild expectations of a "peak in interest rate hikes." She publicly stated that under the current policy stance, the time required for inflation to return to the 2% target "may exceed acceptable levels," and the Fed needs to make monetary policy more restrictive, indicating that interest rates "still need to be raised" and maintaining a tightening stance before achieving the price stability goal is appropriate. More importantly for trading, she preferred a method of "smaller adjustments but more frequently," accompanied by her judgment that while recent U.S. Treasury yields have risen, the overall financial conditions remain neutral, effectively informing the market that the economy can still bear tighter funding prices and that high-frequency interest rate hikes have not been ruled out for the future. This hawkish signal contradicts the previous mainstream expectation of "rates near their peak and the rate hike cycle nearing its end," forcing capital to reassess the future trajectory of risk-free rates and financial conditions. For cryptocurrency risk assets including BTC and ETH, the new expectation of rising rates and tightening monetary conditions means that the discount rate for valuations will continue to increase, risk appetite will be suppressed, and the relative attractiveness between dollar assets and on-chain assets will begin to shuffle anew.

The Rate Hike Cycle Is Not Over: Hawkish Voter Reshapes the Path

At the annual meeting, Hammack directly highlighted the focus of controversy: in her view, the current level of interest rates is not sufficient for inflation to return to the 2% target within "an acceptable timeframe," and the restrictive nature of monetary policy remains weak. In other words, what the market perceives as "close to the end" from the perspective of this 2026 FOMC voter appears more like an unfinished uphill journey. She emphasized that maintaining a tightening stance before true price stability is achieved is not only appropriate but necessary, and explicitly stated that interest rates still need to be raised and that rate hikes are possible in the future, although the timing and magnitude have yet to be specified. This statement effectively tore down the mild narrative of "the rate hike cycle has ended" in public, pushing the two key macro variables of terminal interest rates and the duration of tightening back into a state of uncertainty.

As a hawkish voice with voting rights, Hammack's position first impacted the interest rate expectation curve: the longer the "time for inflation to decrease," the more it implies that the policy interest rate stays at a higher range for a longer period, short-term interest rate expectations are revised upward, and long-term yields need to be re-embedded into assumptions of a tighter monetary environment. She preferred "smaller but more frequent" adjustments, forcing the market to price in a more frequent policy reaction function, the uncertainty of interest rates itself will uplift the premium required for risk assets. During this repricing process, assets like BTC and ETH, regarded as high-volatility long-term assets, see their discount rates forced upward, the yield references of on-chain funds shift from "near-peak interest rates" to "still in an upward adjustable interest rate corridor," and some capital may tend to flow back into short-term debt and cash-like instruments, leading to an upward re-anchoring of the overall risk premium for cryptocurrencies; for the crypto market, what truly needs to be tracked is whether the sustained increase in risk premium following the repricing of interest rate paths leads to a structural withdrawal of on-chain funds.

Small Steps, High-Frequency Rate Hikes: New Pressures on Volatility and Risk Appetite

Hammack did not simply throw out a statement like "we need to raise rates again," but instead indicated a shift in rhythm—from the traditional "large and low frequency" to a tilt towards "smaller and more frequent" rate adjustment methods. The reasoning she provided is that this approach makes it easier for businesses and households to plan their financial decisions in advance; it seems to reduce the uncertainty of a "policy surprise" for micro entities, but on a macro level, it suggests another kind of ongoing pressure: interest rates will no longer rapidly approach peak levels through several large actions, but rather maintain a tighter stance over a longer period with small but continuously accumulating steps. For the market, this path makes it more challenging for the "terminal interest rate" to become a clear anchor that can be traded quickly, as capital must endure the suspense of "interest rates still being adjustable" for a more extended period, thus suppressing risk appetite and making it difficult for a typical scenario of "a collective rush into high-beta assets after peaking interest rates" to occur.

Extending to the cryptocurrency market, this gradual but continuous tightening path will quietly rewrite the volatility structure and trading rhythm of BTC and ETH. Traditional large interest rate hikes often create significant volatility in the week of announcement, after which the market quickly reprices around the new interest rate level, and long and short positions can capitalize on "policy implementations" to capture directional gains; however, in Hammack's preferred small-step high-frequency mode, the interest rate path itself becomes a continuous source of disturbance, the increase in discount rates is no longer a few jumps but slowly climbs along the timeline, suppressing significant event-driven market movements while raising medium to long-term uncertainty. The result is that longs find it harder to confidently leverage up after a "confirmed peak," while shorts must dynamically manage positions and drawdowns amidst a series of small adjustments. The long/short rhythm of on-chain funds is thus forced into a shorter, more fragmented trading cycle, with volatility shifting from concentrating on a few key meeting days to reflecting more frequent but not necessarily extreme "slow grind" volatility throughout the entire tightening phase. This will determine whether the crypto market, under Hammack's small-step high-frequency tightening, experiences a brief period of risk suppression or enters a new normal of high volatility and high risk premiums.

U.S. Treasury Yields Ascend, Still Neutral: Rate Attractiveness Crowds Out Crypto

More dramatically, Hammack is not calling for tightening in an environment that has already been "crushed by high interest rates." At the annual meeting, she pointed out that U.S. Treasury yields have recently risen significantly, but overall financial conditions remain, in her view, "neutral," and have not genuinely suppressed demand; the economy can still withstand tighter monetary policy. This effectively tells the market that even though Treasury yields have risen to some extent, they have not yet reached the threshold of "injuring fundamentals," and therefore continuing to maintain or even escalate tightening is reasonable. This judgment directly boosts future expectations for risk-free yields, reopening space for what was initially thought to be a "peak approaching" rate hike cycle.

For cryptocurrency assets, the macro script changing is not just about funding costs but also the benchmark for opportunity costs. As dollar rates continue to rise, the annualized returns on safe assets like U.S. Treasuries and money market funds are still deemed "adjustable" variables under Hammack's framework. Traditional capital will be attracted to higher certainty yields, creating an "attraction effect" towards rate products, and correspondingly leading to a "crowding out effect" for high-volatility assets like BTC and ETH. Whether through institutions raising the threshold yield for dollar rates in asset allocation or the increased financing costs in dollars for crypto trading, the outcome follows the same logic: each unit of risk capital must prove its worthier "return," and allocations to on-chain positions require higher expected returns to pass muster. Under the combination of Hammack's neutral financial conditions and tighter policies, the valuation space of BTC and ETH will be compressed, and their risk premiums will increase.

Above the Inflation Target: BTC/ETH Pressured by Higher Discount Rates

When Hammack repeatedly emphasized at the annual meeting that "inflation has not yet returned to the 2% target" and believes that under the current policy stance, inflation's return will take a "longer than acceptable time," what the market hears is not merely a technical statement, but a language of asset pricing: the discount rate must be higher and maintained for a longer duration. She clearly stated that interest rates still need to be raised and preferred "smaller but more frequent" rate hikes, essentially telling investors that over the next period, the path of risk-free rates will rise and be filled with momentum, which directly rewrites the underlying parameters of valuation for all long-duration assets.

Under this hypothetical path, BTC is repriced as a "long-term risk asset": its narrative leans more towards future adoption and long-term hedging against fiat currency systems instead of current cash flows. An increase in the discount rate implies that future prices and application prospects are deemed "more distant," and institutions discount the future upward space in their models, meaning the current price they are willing to pay for an asset with no short-term earnings is compressed. ETH resembles more of a tech growth stock: network fees, application ecosystems, and on-chain activities lead to "cash flows" and network value being highly front-loaded into the future. In a context where Hammack advocates for maintaining a restrictive monetary policy and inflation risks remain elevated, these future returns must be discounted at higher rates, naturally contracting valuation multiples, as funds tend to seek refuge in shorter-duration, high-certainty dollar rate assets.

Previously, the market believed the rate hike cycle was nearing its end, but now, after this hawkish statement, needs to repricing expectations for inflation and interest rates: inflation is seen as "still a task not completed," and the peak of policy and duration at high levels has been revised upward. The valuation anchors for BTC and ETH have shifted from "liquidity easing is on the way" to "the high-rate norm is not yet over." Under this anchor, the allocation preferences of on-chain funds naturally shift from chasing high beta long positions to placing more emphasis on liquidity and yield certainty in dollar-denominated instruments. After Hammack's remarks, the key determining factor for whether BTC and ETH can escape the pressures of high discount rates will become the speed at which inflation returns to 2% and the new consensus on the peak and duration of interest rates.

After the Hawkish Signal: Macroeconomic Radars for Crypto Traders

Hammack's statement at this annual meeting equated to pressing the "tighten again" button simultaneously on the three main lines of interest rate paths, financial conditions assessments, and risk appetite: on one hand, as this year's FOMC voter, she publicly preferred a "smaller amplitude, higher frequency" interest rate hike method and explicitly believes that interest rates still need to be raised and that the tightening stance should be maintained until inflation returns to 2%, which elongates what was originally perceived by the market as a nearing end of the rate hike cycle; on the other hand, she acknowledges the recent significant rise in U.S. Treasury yields while still defining financial conditions as "neutral," indicating that within her framework, the current interest and yield levels are still insufficient to genuinely suppress demand, and risk assets did not gain the protective umbrella of "the financial environment is sufficiently tight, and can be relaxed afterwards." Under this macro narrative, the overall judgment for the crypto market is straightforward: interest rate peaks are uncertain, and the duration might be longer, strengthening the relative attractiveness of dollar assets, and BTC and ETH can only seek a new balance under higher discount rate ceilings. Specifically for traders' radars, they need to monitor three types of signals: first, whether subsequent public comments from other Federal Reserve officials follow Hammack’s hawkish tendencies, thus incorporating "small steps, high-frequency rate hikes" into collective expectations; second, whether the U.S. Treasury yield curve continues to rise or falls, and whether various financial conditions indices remain within the "neutral" range, which determines how much more tightening can be done and how long it may last; third, whether on-chain and market structural indicators agree with this path—whether the supply of dollar-anchored assets continues to expand or contract, whether BTC/ETH futures basis and funding rates shift to a discount or increased short rates, or whether opportunities for positive hedging reappear under high-rate shadows. For crypto traders, what truly needs to be continuously tracked is not the emotional fluctuations from any single speech but whether these macro and on-chain signals converge in the same direction, as they will ultimately together determine the price center and volatility structure of BTC and ETH under high-frequency small-step rate hike expectations.

Join our community, let's discuss, and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。