Since October, a Nasdaq-listed company that was originally viewed as "heavily bound to Solana" has suddenly started to loosen its chips. Public materials show that SkyAI (stock code SKYA) had previously held over 2 million Solana (SOL) as its core digital asset reserve, yet within less than a month, it transferred about 1.57 million SOL out of its holdings, valued at about $175 million at the time of reporting, of which only about 1 million SOL, valued at approximately $100 to $107 million, was included in the company's public disclosures. Almost simultaneously with this significant reduction, SkyAI proposed a cash tender offer plan, attempting to repurchase some company shares, but the details of the terms remain vague in the current materials. The real source of conflict ignited by the response of the major shareholder: Bastion Trading, holding about 9.99%, publicly voiced its concerns, pointing out that SkyAI had quietly sold about 70% of its SOL reserves in less than a month, rejecting participation in the tender offer and demanding a more comprehensive explanation from the company for this large sale. Without a detailed official response or formal regulatory intervention, this conflict surrounding the sharp reduction in SOL positions has essentially escalated into a governance dispute regarding how publicly listed companies manage on-chain assets and whether they are willing to transparently disclose key decisions.
From SOL Reserve Company to Large-scale Reduction
To understand the intensity of this dispute, one must return to the initial positioning SkyAI left in the market. According to public materials, before October, SkyAI held over 2 million SOL as its core digital asset reserve, and such a concentrated exposure to a single chain asset was uncommon among Nasdaq-listed companies. The outside world had once regarded SkyAI as a "company heavily bound to Solana," tying its stock price and company risk closely to the fate of those 2 million SOL.
The real rupture in expectations occurred after October. According to AiCoin data, since October, SkyAI has transferred approximately 1.57 million SOL on-chain and at the asset level, valued at about $175 million at the time of reporting. The company confirmed in its disclosures that it sold about 1 million SOL, with the media estimating the corresponding amount to be in the $100 to $107 million range, while there has yet to be a clear explanation regarding the remaining transferred portion. Consequently, the market and media summarized this position reduction as "approximately 70% of reserves sold or transferred," indicating that a previously nearly all-in company on SOL had actively dismantled most of its chips in less than a month. This pace and proportion forced external observers to reassess SkyAI's asset allocation logic, believing its risk appetite is shifting from highly concentrated, clearly directed exposure to a single chain to a smaller scale but structurally opaque new status.
Tender Offer Encountering Obstacles and Bastion's Counterattack
Following the intensive transfer out of 1.57 million SOL on-chain, SkyAI almost simultaneously announced another capital action: launching a cash tender offer, using its own funds to initiate a share buyback from circulating shareholders. Current materials did not disclose the specific price range and scale of the offer, nor did they clearly state the correlation between the sale of SOL and the repurchase funds, leaving only a rough outline - the management is rapidly contracting its exposure to Solana while attempting to reshape the company's equity structure and market image through the buyback.
The one pushing this arrangement into the spotlight was Bastion Trading, a significant shareholder with approximately 9.99%. As an essential shareholder close to 10%, Bastion publicly announced its refusal to participate in the cash tender offer and explicitly criticized SkyAI for "quietly" selling about 70% of its SOL reserves in less than a month, questioning whether the company was sufficiently transparent in its disclosures. Bastion tied its stance to governance demands: unless SkyAI provides a comprehensive explanation regarding the path, pace, and decision-making process of the substantial SOL sale, it would not cooperate with management in "smoothing" the impact of the event through buybacks. Thus, what could have been packaged as a routine capital structure optimization quickly evolved into a public game of chess between management and major shareholders over decisions on on-chain reductions and disclosure obligations.
The Grey Area of Digital Asset Reserves and Information Disclosure
In traditional corporate governance frameworks, "significant asset changes" are usually regarded as matters that require timely and thorough explanation, but the premise is often that these assets are in bank accounts, securities accounts, or physical projects, with trading paths and settlement cycles relatively clear. When core reserves become on-chain tokens, the board and management face a different set of semantics: whether an on-chain transfer counts as a "reduction," whether it is an internal address adjustment or an external sale, whether it needs to be disclosed separately, and how the timing and detail of disclosures match shareholder expectations have not been fully answered by existing rules. The result is a regulatory and cognitive gray area between traditional information disclosure systems and visible on-chain financial actions.
The controversy surrounding SkyAI is stuck in the middle of this grey line. According to AiCoin data, since October, SkyAI has cumulatively transferred out about 1.57 million SOL on-chain, while the company only explained in public materials that it sold approximately 1 million SOL, corresponding to an amount of $100 to $107 million, leaving a "blank space for explanation" of nearly 570,000 tokens between the two. In less than a month, the core reserves were reduced by about 70%, while a cash tender offer was simultaneously issued, yet the management did not provide a more detailed narrative regarding the pace and direction of the reduction and its connection to the repurchase plan. This made it difficult for major shareholders and the market to judge: whether such a level of reserve adjustment, in the eyes of management, was merely "routine asset management" or had already touched the threshold of a significant matter that required additional explanation. The SkyAI case exposes not only the differences between on-chain and off-chain accounting but also raises the question of what scale and speed of substantial reductions must be placed under the spotlight and clearly communicated to all shareholders when digital assets become "core chips" on a publicly listed company's balance sheet.
The Implications of SkyAI's Actions for Shareholders and SOL
When Bastion Trading publicly refused to participate in the cash tender offer as a major shareholder with approximately 9.99%, and explicitly criticized the company for quietly selling about 70% of its SOL reserves in less than a month, it became clear that this was no longer merely a technical asset adjustment but had escalated into a conflict of trust between shareholders and management. For retail and small shareholders, on one hand, there is evidence from AiCoin data showing that about 1.57 million SOL was transferred out in a short time, of which approximately 1 million has been clearly sold for cash, while on the other hand, there is a lack of clear reasons for the reduction and asset reallocation plans, forcing them to infer risk judgments from the major shareholder's doubts. This information asymmetry is likely to lower their expectations regarding the quality of corporate governance and may be reflected in valuation as a demand for a discount on management.
From the perspective of the SOL market, the Nasdaq-listed company previously packaged as "with Solana as the core reserve" converted most of its positions to dollars within a month, which is difficult not to be interpreted as some signal of risk repricing or strategic adjustment: whether it is a reassessment of single chain exposure or a repositioning of its business model, the existing materials do not provide answers. As the report does not offer a more detailed on-chain breakdown, specific transaction price ranges, or company profit and loss data, the external observations can only construct narratives around "70% reduction," "major shareholder not buying in," "tender offer running parallel to sell-off," and so forth, resulting in discussions primarily residing in emotions and positions rather than in quantitative analyses based on complete data.
Examining the Future of Governance in Crypto Companies through the SkyAI Controversy
SkyAI's reduction of about 70% of its SOL reserves in less than a month, while only synchronously disclosing details of about 1 million sold, and the disconnect between large on-chain transfers and information timing directly triggered the public counterattack and refusal to participate in the tender offer by Bastion Trading, a shareholder holding about 9.99%. This brought differences that should ideally be resolved internally within the board and shareholder meetings to the forefront. This conflict illustrates for the first time the "pressure test of governance" on public companies with single-chain assets as core reserves: when the company's treasury is highly concentrated in a certain crypto asset, significant adjustments in positions are no longer just asset management decisions but will be immediately interpreted as repricing of stock prices, shareholder rights, and even company strategy. For publicly listed companies that hold large amounts of crypto assets in the future, the SkyAI case conveys at least three signals: first, the timing of disclosures regarding on-chain address and position changes must align with significant decisions rather than being addressed afterwards with rough numbers; second, major shareholders pressuring publicly is becoming a routine tool to bind management, especially in scenarios where reserves are concentrated and information asymmetry is more pronounced; third, in the absence of detailed responses from SkyAI and formal regulatory statements, this incident is likely to be referenced as a sample in subsequent institutional discussions and market practices. It is worth monitoring whether SkyAI will proactively disclose the uses and logic behind the remaining SOL transfers, whether other shareholders will further respond collectively after Bastion, and whether the regulatory authorities will intervene to promote clearer governance rules regarding crypto asset holdings and significant adjustments.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
