Ethereum has actively pressed the brakes on the upgrade this time. Originally, the Hoodi testnet was scheduled to fork towards the Glamsterdam upgrade, rehearsing more technical changes for the subsequent mainnet rhythm. However, on October 26, Ethereum Foundation researcher Toni Wahrstätter confirmed in a post that the core developers have decided to delay this fork. The reason is not hesitation in the process, but rather a security report concerning EIP-8037 that has put the upgrade on hold. For Airdrop Radar users, this is not merely a piece of "technical news," but an upstream variable that directly impacts the task arrangements and airdrop window rhythm of Ethereum ecosystem projects.
The key trigger for this delay is a report on EIP-8037 disclosed by the security auditing firm ChainSecurity. The report points out that EIP-8037 has compatibility and potential security issues when interacting with certain smart contracts, forcing developers to reassess the costs of rolling this change out on a larger scale. Subsequently, within the Glamsterdam testnet environment, the team has essentially clarified the specific impact of EIP-8037 on contract interactions, shifting the risks from "unknown" to "identifiable," but a new fork time has not yet been made public. From the perspective of Airdrop Radar, this means that the airdrop rhythm of the Ethereum ecosystem will face short-term technical uncertainties: the task phases and distribution paths of some projects may need to realign with the upgrade timing. However, given that the risk has been identified and is under review, technical decision-making remains focused on security boundaries. Airdrop Radar will view this process as an important reference for technical fundamentals, rather than simply equating a delay in the upgrade with a weakening of airdrop certainty.
Pause on the Upgrade: How a Security Report Disrupted the Rhythm
In the technical progression rhythm of the Glamsterdam upgrade, the actual brake was not the testnet itself, but a risk assessment report from ChainSecurity. Upon receiving this analysis regarding EIP-8037, Ethereum core developers did not choose to "wait and see," but collectively decided to delay the Hoodi testnet's fork towards Glamsterdam. On October 26, Ethereum Foundation researcher Toni Wahrstätter publicly clarified this report as the main reason for the postponement—the upgrade path switched from "countdown" to "pause and review" in an instant, as the security audit firm directly intervened in the ordering of the technical timeline.
This disruption of rhythm underscores Ethereum's high dependence on and respect for third-party security audits before major version upgrades. The report disclosed by ChainSecurity indicated compatibility and potential safety issues with EIP-8037 when interacting with certain contracts, prompting core developers to discuss these unknown risks and consider the delay in the fork as a necessary cost for the contract ecosystem to gain time. Later, within the Glamsterdam testnet environment, the research and development team has largely clarified the specific impact of EIP-8037 on contract interactions, moving the risks from "unobservable" to "identifiable." From the on-chain ecological perspective of Airdrop Radar, this "security-first" decision is an upstream background variable affecting the current participation rhythm: it does not directly conclude airdrop distribution for any project, but will continuously influence the participation paths of users regarding task phase arrangements, eligibility verification windows, and technical fundamental assessments.
EIP-8037 Named: Contract Interaction Becomes a Potential Minefield
In this paused upgrade, the spotlight has truly fallen on EIP-8037. It was originally just an improvement proposal within the Glamsterdam upgrade plan, but due to the potential compatibility and safety hazards when interacting with smart contracts, it has been directly highlighted by the security audit, instantly transforming from a "technical detail" to a core variable affecting the timeline. For upstream developers, this is not simply a code patch issue but requires answering a more critical question: Will the numerous contracts already running on Ethereum encounter unseen risks due to this change?
The ChainSecurity report focuses the controversy on a scenario—when on-chain contracts reach the behavior changes introduced by EIP-8037 under specific interaction paths, will unexpected outcomes occur? Public information has not listed the specific numbers or types of affected contracts, but for ecosystem participants, this kind of "uncertainty list" is enough to compel all parties to reassess their existing task paths: which interaction tasks that depend on complex contract calls need reevaluation, and which projects need to reserve more buffer periods based on technical fundamentals. Airdrop Radar will treat these kinds of "audit-named" improvement proposals as technical warning signals during the filtering and tracking of Ethereum ecosystem projects, rather than simply focusing on whether the upgrade lands on time.
Notably, with the advancement of the Glamsterdam testnet environment, the specific impacts of EIP-8037 on contract interactions have been largely clarified by the development and research teams, shifting technical risks from the "unknown zone" to the "identifiable zone." This means that upstream understanding of problem boundaries is becoming clearer; whether for proposal revisions or adjustments in upgrade tempo, the logic will be more predictable. For airdrop projects and participants reliant on the Ethereum ecosystem, this does not translate into a direct issuance promise, but rather serves as an invisible demarcation concerning task rhythm, qualification verification methods, and technical fundamental evaluations, thereby becoming a key technical variable for Airdrop Radar's ongoing tracking.
Testnet Rhythm Slows: Indirect Pressure on Ethereum Airdrop Lines
From the project cards visible to users, the postponement of the Hoodi testnet's fork towards the Glamsterdam upgrade has not immediately stirred a "status reordering" in the Ethereum section of Airdrop Radar. Current public information has yet to provide a new fork time, nor confirmed if the Ethereum mainnet timeline will be affected; therefore, whether "claimable," "under verification," or still in early task phases, the participation paths of projects remain contingent on the announcements made by the respective project parties. In other words, this technical incident primarily impacts the timeline and technical background, rather than the tasks or claim entrances already visible to users.
The real pressure falls on those projects that regard the Ethereum upgrade roadmap as a reference for task design. Some Ethereum ecosystem projects, when planning interactive actions for the testnet, will conceive incentive tasks and qualification verification logic surrounding the new testnet environment or new features; now that the fork timing for Glamsterdam remains ambiguous, these plans must leave more buffer periods, delaying or splitting the rhythm of tasks originally aimed to "hit the upgrade window." For users, such changes often reflect updates in task instructions and time boundaries rather than a project suddenly reverting from "claimable" back to a prior stage.
From Airdrop Radar's perspective, the delay of this upgrade and the risk handling around EIP-8037 are considered as upstream variables affecting the task rhythm of the Ethereum ecosystem but will not be directly equated with a plus or minus effect on the certainty of any airdrop issuance. The key signal users need to discern is that Ethereum's technical timeline is introducing more time and technical variables that require continuous attention; these factors will ultimately be channeled to the Airdrop Radar page through project adjustments in task rhythms, changes in participation phases, and modifications of eligibility rules.
Safety-First Development Culture: Calibration of Consensus Between Projects and Participants
The proactive delay of the Hoodi testnet's upgrade to Glamsterdam essentially represents a value choice made within the testing environment: Ethereum core developers actively postponed rather than waiting for incidents on the mainnet to roll back. On October 26, researcher Toni Wahrstätter made this decision public and pointed to ChainSecurity's audit report on EIP-8037—the report clarified compatibility and potential safety issues when interacting with certain contracts. Subsequently, the upgrade team has gradually clarified the specific effects of EIP-8037 on contract interactions within the Glamsterdam testnet, condensing risks from "unknown" to "identifiable," while also reinforcing a signal: third-party security audits are not merely process nodes but are external checks that can directly rewrite the upgrade timeline.
Under this tone, Ethereum projects listed on Airdrop Radar can no longer regard protocol upgrades as a linear, predictable timeline. Airdrop Radar takes funding information and technological progression as references for technical fundamentals in project cards, but will not directly conclude airdrop certainty based on an upgrade's acceleration or delay. For project teams, this compels task design to allow redundant space for protocol changes: no longer treating a specific fork date as the sole task anchor but reserving buffers for "possible delays" and "possible detail adjustments," allowing eligibility verification, phase transitions, and points or whitelist rhythms to be synchronized with upstream technical variables, rather than continuing forward in task-side when a pause is pressed on the technical side.
For participants, this safety-first culture is reshaping their information priority on Airdrop Radar. In the past, when filtering Ethereum ecosystem projects, many users solely focused on rising popularity and funding backgrounds; now, the progression of upgrades alongside security audit conclusions is becoming a third line of important information that stands alongside the first two. As users browse project cards and filter the Ethereum section, they are beginning to view technical robustness and upgrade rhythm as necessary considerations before participating: an ecosystem willing to press pause for risks at the testnet stage is more likely to maintain transparency and restraint during future task path adjustments, and this choice of deceleration rather than pushing through in the face of technical variables is itself a key signal that airdrop participants need to understand and use to adjust their participation rhythm.
After Digestion of Technical Risks: New Variables to Monitor in Airdrop Rhythm
The story doesn’t end here; it has merely entered a more sparse but equally critical observation phase. The future timeline for the Glamsterdam upgrade and the final handling of EIP-8037 will become upstream technical signals for continuous tracking by Airdrop Radar: as of now, public channels have not disclosed a new fork date or adjustment plan for the mainnet upgrade. Although EIP-8037 has completed the impact analysis within the Glamsterdam testnet environment, the final plan has yet to be detailed publicly. The October 26 "braking" has been marked as a critical node in the Ethereum upgrade path; Airdrop Radar will, in subsequent selections of Ethereum ecosystem projects, more clearly consider technical upgrades and security audit conclusions as references for assessing project technical fundamentals, rather than simply equating them with airdrop issuance certainty.
Changes that will truly impact users still depend on the rhythm of the upgrade’s resumption and the safety conclusions provided. Whether Ethereum ecosystem projects adjust task windows or modify testnet participation actions will depend on when core developers announce the new timeline, and whether EIP-8037 is ultimately accepted, replaced, or continues to be refined into a compromise solution. Currently, AiCoin data has not shown any signs of collectively adjusting the claimable status or directly closing task windows due to this event. Given the limited information, a more reasonable interpretation is to view this delay as a process where technical risks are exposed and digested in advance—moving risks from "unknown" to "known, pending disposal," rather than simply a negative event. For airdrop participants in the Ethereum ecosystem, what they truly need to monitor are the upgraded rescheduling, EIP-8037 determinations, and the subsequent slight adjustments to task rhythms, as these are the key variables that will alter participation decisions in the near future.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
