On November 6, Eastern Time, the total net outflow of the US spot Bitcoin ETF was approximately $412 million. According to Farside and SoSoValue data, this level of $400 million in a single day is already considered a significant fluctuation historically, but the funds did not withdraw evenly: BlackRock's IBIT experienced a net outflow of about $403 million that day, nearly encompassing the entirety of the selling pressure and becoming the product with the largest outflow. In stark contrast, Fidelity's FBTC recorded a net inflow of approximately $42.82 million against the trend, not only being the Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow that day but also accumulating a historical net inflow of about $10.266 billion, showing that it continues to attract funds. On the same day, the US spot Ethereum ETF recorded a net outflow of about $93.3 million. The Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have seen overall capital outflows for two consecutive trading days, and amidst this backdrop of financial pressure, Glassnode pointed out that the correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 over the past 30 US trading days is about 0.8, which is relatively high since 2020 and emphasized that macro factors are still largely dominating the market. This high correlation is also interpreted by the market as Bitcoin increasingly being viewed as a high beta risk asset that fluctuates with the stock market.
$412 million net outflow: Funds hit the brakes
On November 6, Eastern Time, the US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a total net outflow of approximately $412 million. The research background indicates that a single day outflow at the $400 million level is already considered a large-scale fluctuation historically, which means this instance is not just regular intraday emotional noise, but rather a funding event that can be distinctly marked in a time series. More importantly, this day's outflow was highly concentrated in leading products, with the adjustment of a single product being sufficient to drive the overall scale up, causing the funds to exhibit a "brake-hitting" type of collective reaction.
According to BlockBeats quoting Farside, the US spot Bitcoin ETF has seen significant net outflows for two consecutive trading days. Under this continuity, the $412 million on November 6 is no longer an isolated liquidity peak, but more like a signal of a phase-wise exit by institutional channels. Since the launch of related products, their fund flows have been widely used by the market as a high-frequency indicator to monitor institutional funds entering and exiting the crypto market, and any single-day outflow exceeding the $400 million level is viewed as a concentrated repricing of sentiment and positions; when both the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs are in a continuous net outflow phase, this high-frequency indicator releases a clear directional message: institutional funds are collectively reducing their risk exposure to crypto assets in the short term.
IBIT loses blood, FBTC attracts funds against the trend
From a product structure perspective, the net outflow of approximately $412 million from the Bitcoin spot ETF on November 6 was almost entirely attributed to BlackRock's IBIT. On that day, IBIT experienced a net outflow of about $403 million, the largest scale among all similar products, its outflow scale approaching the total net outflow of the entire market, indicating that funds withdrew highly concentratedly from leading products rather than uniformly from all products. Given that previous fluctuations of over $400 million in a single day have been regarded as significant, IBIT's concentrated loss amplified the overall sentiment signal of "institutions are withdrawing," but this signal more indicates repositioning of positions at the specific product level.
In contrast, Fidelity's FBTC recorded a net inflow of approximately $42.82 million on the same day, making it the Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow that day, and its historical cumulative net inflow has reached about $10.266 billion, showing that its characteristic of continuously attracting funds since its launch has not been interrupted by the current short-term fluctuations. While IBIT experienced significant outflows, FBTC continued to receive funds, and with the steady increase in FBTC's cumulative size, it can be regarded as one of the primary "buyers" and long-term incremental channels in the current market. Thus, the current $400 million level fund movements are not simply consistent withdrawals; they resemble migration and rebalancing between different issuers and products, indicating that the market needs to shift its focus from a single volume perspective to attention to funding differentiation at the product level.
Ethereum ETF facing pressure simultaneously
On the same day the Bitcoin ETF witnessed a $412 million net outflow, the US spot Ethereum ETF also did not escape unscathed. Farside data shows that on November 6, the Ethereum ETF recorded a net outflow of about $93.3 million, marking its second consecutive trading day with negative funds, meaning the pressure is not solely in the Bitcoin direction; withdrawals from mainstream crypto asset ETFs are occurring simultaneously. Considering that the US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have been viewed as important high-frequency indicators of institutional entry and exit into the crypto market since their launch, this simultaneous net outflow pattern will have a noticeably stronger suppressive effect on overall sentiment than the volatility of a single asset.
From an allocation perspective, the Bitcoin ETF and Ethereum ETF have recorded net outflows for two consecutive trading days; combined with the over $500 million funding withdrawal on November 6 from both, it resembles a "portfolio risk reduction" behavior model rather than just rotation between coins. For institutions viewing Bitcoin and Ethereum as high-volatility risk assets, this simultaneous reduction of positions releases a signal of a temporary retreat in risk appetite: on one hand, the overall fund pressure on crypto ETFs constrains the allocation weights centered on these two types of products; on the other hand, whether funds will flow back in the future and which type of products they will flow back to will directly become key observational indicators for assessing whether institutions' risk compensation requirements for crypto assets have been raised again.
Correlation spikes to 0.8
In conjunction with the background of simultaneous outflow from ETFs, another set of data provided by Glassnode further illustrates the issue: the correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 over the past 30 US trading days is about 0.8. A correlation coefficient close to 1 indicates that the price movements of the two are highly synchronized, and Glassnode points out that this level has been relatively high since 2020, with Bitcoin and the stock market rarely exhibiting such tight linkage. In other words, in this recent interval, Bitcoin's intraday volatility is more like an "amplified version" of the S&P 500, with macro factors driving both on the same line.
Glassnode concludes that current macro factors still largely dominate the overall market, and under this framework of 0.8 correlation, Bitcoin is increasingly being traded as a high beta risk asset: when stock market sentiment cools down and risk appetite falls, Bitcoin often adjusts before or to a greater extent than the stock market, and ETF fund outflows are also interpreted as an extended manifestation in this chain. Correspondingly, the narratives earlier emphasized about Bitcoin's "independent market" and "hedging properties" have been noticeably weakened during this phase, with its pricing being closer to that of a high-risk asset portfolio fluctuating with the macro cycle rather than an independent variable that can be priced separately from traditional assets.
From independent market to price anchor of risk assets
On November 6, both Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs recorded net outflows, with the Bitcoin ETF experiencing a total net outflow of about $412 million, combined with the correlation coefficient of Bitcoin and the S&P 500 being about 0.8 at a high level over the past 30 US trading days, these two clues point to one change: Bitcoin is increasingly being incorporated into traditional institutions' asset pricing frameworks, being traded as a high beta risk asset that fluctuates with macro emotional changes, shifting its price anchor from "independent market" to its linkage with the stock market and other risk assets. It is essential to emphasize that this outflow is not a simple "collective retreat"; there is a clear differentiation of funds between products: BlackRock's IBIT had a net outflow of approximately $403 million on November 6, while Fidelity's FBTC had a counter-trend net inflow of about $42.82 million, with a historical cumulative net inflow of about $10.266 billion. This structure of significant outflows from leading products on one side and continued fund absorption by some products on the other side warns investors that when interpreting ETF data, it is crucial to distinguish whether overall capital is exiting the market or migrating "positions" between different issuers and fee structures. In future observations, the net flow changes of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, especially the fluctuating flow between leading products like IBIT and FBTC, as well as whether the correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 maintains around 0.8, continues to rise at a high level, or shows a significant decline, will be key indicators for judging whether institutional risk appetite and Bitcoin's market positioning undergo further shifts.
Join our community to discuss together and become stronger!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
