Recently, Bitcoin suddenly accelerated downwards against the backdrop of highly concentrated long leverage positions, with the intraday price repeatedly breaching the key thresholds of $65,000 and $64,000, displaying obvious characteristics of continuous breakdowns. Accompanied by the rapid price decline, the futures market experienced concentrated liquidations within a very short time. According to CoinGlass data statistics, the total liquidation scale across the network in the past hour was approximately $691 million, of which the liquidation of long positions was about $671 million, and the liquidation of short positions was about $19.51 million. The imbalance between long and short positions was extreme, indicating that previous market risks were almost entirely piled on the long side. This round of price movement did not reflect clear news impacts but was a typical case of "crowded high-leverage longs - price breaks key levels - passive liquidations magnify downward trends," with the selling pressure mainly coming from insufficient long margin triggering forced liquidations, and the technical sell-offs at the contract level dominating market direction within a short time.

Key thresholds breached in succession

In this recent round of price action dominated by technical selling pressure, Bitcoin's price began to accelerate downwards from around $65,000, first breaching the first key threshold. When BTC fell below $65,000, HTX quoted about $64,966.08, corresponding to a 24-hour drop of approximately 5.76%; OKX quoted approximately $64,950.9 USDT during the same period. Both mainstream platforms gave the price signal "fell below $65,000" around the same time, and the price did not show significant pauses near the key level, indicating that the downward momentum had opened up after the combination of active selling and passive liquidations.

Once a key threshold is breached, subsequent declines lack effective buffers and quickly extend to the level of $64,000. When it further fell below $64,000, HTX quoted approximately $63,965.39, OKX about $63,979.6 USDT, and Bitget about $63,943.13 USDT, with the prices from all three platforms almost in the same concentrated range; according to their respective statistics, the 24-hour and intraday declines were approximately in the range of 5.76%–6.65%. OKX showed a 24-hour decline of about 6.64% and an intraday decline of about 2.69%, while Bitget had an intraday decline of about 6.40%. The two key thresholds of $65,000 and $64,000 were breached in quick succession, with different platforms showing highly synchronized prices. This price structure caused continuous impacts on investors' psychological support, and coupled with the passive selling from highly leveraged longs, resulted in "stomping" behavior in contract trading near the critical levels.

$671 million in long liquidations: Passive selling pressure from longs

According to CoinGlass data, approximately $691 million in liquidations occurred across the network in the past hour, of which about $671 million were from long positions and only about $19.51 million from short positions, indicating an extreme imbalance with "longs outnumbering shorts by dozens of times." This ratio directly reveals that prior to the decline, market leverage risk was highly concentrated on the long side, as most traders chose to increase leverage betting on upward movement at the $65,000 and $64,000 levels, meaning that once the price fell below these key integers, the densely stacked long positions were the first to be affected.

Under the mechanism of contract trading, the margin for longs rapidly shrinks as the price falls. When the equity falls below the maintenance margin requirement, the exchange's system will passively liquidate it, converting it into immediate market sell orders. The current $671 million scale of long liquidations essentially represents concentrated passive sell orders surging out within a short period, directly exacerbating Bitcoin's downward slope during the breakdown process. In contrast, the liquidation of short positions was only about $19.51 million, indicating that the dominant force in this round of movement was not shorts actively increasing their positions at high levels to suppress the price but rather the automatic dismantling and liquidation of the long leverage chain amidst continuous breakdowns. This signifies that the rapid price drop this time was more driven by passive selling from crowded longs rather than sustained offensive actions from shorts.

Leverage liquidation spiral: Drop - liquidation - accelerated decline

In the context of highly concentrated long leverage, BTC prices continuously broke below the $65,000 and $64,000 thresholds, directly triggering a rapid deterioration of margin ratios. As the market price dropped from HTX's approximate $64,966.08 down to the range quoted by OKX and Bitget of around $63,980/63,940, a large number of long contracts hit the maintenance margin thresholds preset by the exchange. The system automatically initiated the forced liquidation process according to risk control rules, placing sell orders at the market price incrementally. The chain of falling prices - insufficient margin - triggering forced liquidation rapidly cycled repeatedly within a very short time, quickly amplifying the total liquidation scale across the network to about $691 million in the past hour, with about $671 million from longs, with the selling pressure almost entirely coming from passive liquidations rather than active reductions by investors.

This process has essential differences in performance from ordinary spot selling. Spot selling involves holders actively placing orders in batches based on expectations and liquidity conditions, with a relatively controllable rhythm; whereas contract liquidations involve the risk control system intervening instantaneously once a threshold is breached, disregarding price structures and market depth, and only continuously executing orders at market price, easily creating a localized "vacuum" at illiquid price points, compressing what could have been a gradual deleveraging process into a few concentrated long downward candles. Differentiating between spot selling pressure and liquidation pressure aids in understanding that this round of price movement below $64,000 was more driven by a technical liquidation spiral rather than a single-direction active selling behavior.

Platform data discrepancies: How to interpret the decline rates

From platform data, there is an obvious discrepancy in the interpretation of decline rates. When BTC fell below around $65,000, HTX quoted approximately $64,966.08, with a corresponding 24-hour decline of about 5.76%; subsequently, when it was breached at $64,000, OKX quoted about $63,979.6 USDT, indicating a 24-hour decline of approximately 6.64% and an intraday decline of about 2.69%; Bitget quoted around $63,943.13 USDT within the same price range but reported an intraday decline of about 6.40%. The same asset, close time points, but appearing with multiple numbers such as 5.76%, 6.64%, 6.40%, and 2.69%, indicates that there is no unified official answer to how much the decline was, but it depends on the statistical starting point and calculation dimension.

The key to the differences lies in the different time windows and reference prices: the 24-hour decline can be traced back from the current moment for an entire day or can be based on the platform-defined "natural day's" opening price; the "intraday decline," however, may be calculated according to the zero point of the trading day, the daily settlement time, or a certain reference price in the market. Research briefs also clearly indicate that there are differences in the statistical definitions of 24-hour and intraday declines among the various platforms, and it must be noted when reporting and analyzing that specific data sources and calculation methods are cited. For investors, a more reasonable approach is to understand this round of adjustment as a sharp decline roughly in the range of 5.7%–6.6%, while assessing risks in conjunction with the trend of broken key levels, rather than considering a single percentage from one platform as the final standard to precisely depict market volatility.

After the short-term reshuffle: Long risks and next steps to consider

During this rapid decline, BTC quickly broke below $65,000 and $64,000, with a 24-hour decline concentrated in the range of about 5%–6%. In the past hour, the total liquidation across the network was approximately $691 million, of which about $671 million was from long positions and only about $19.51 million from short positions, and the extremely tilted liquidation structure itself serves as a direct risk warning to highly leveraged longs. For traders participating in short-term contracts, this typical "breach of key levels + high leverage liquidation" process indicates that in a high leverage environment, levels of margin, concentration of positions, and selection of key price points are more decisive than directional judgment itself. When the price falls within the previously densely populated area of longs by 5%–6%, accounts with insufficient margin buffer are highly likely to be forcefully liquidated by the system, further amplifying the "decline - liquidation - further decline" liquidation spiral. How to respond subsequently does not rely on predicting where BTC will go, but rather on establishing a quantifiable risk management framework, such as continuously tracking changes in the long-short ratio within various liquidation data, assessing the deviations of one’s own leverage relative to the overall market leverage, and identifying price points like $65,000 and $64,000 that could trigger concentrated liquidations once breached, thereby controlling position and leverage levels under data-driven constraints so that each short-term reshuffle releases more structural risk rather than uncontrollable losses at the account level.

Join our community to discuss together and grow stronger!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits from AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits from AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。