Deepseek analyzed that the probability of the US Congress approving the inclusion of Bitcoin in the national strategic reserve is very low and almost impossible to pass. The following are the main reasons and analysis: --- 1. The volatility and risk of Bitcoin** -Bitcoin's price fluctuates greatly and is not suitable as a national strategic reserve asset. Strategic reserves typically require highly stable assets (such as gold, foreign exchange, etc.) to cope with economic crises or changes in the international situation. -The US government tends to hold assets with high liquidity and low risk, while the high volatility of Bitcoin does not match its demand. --- 2. Regulatory and Legitimacy Disputes** -Bitcoin has not yet been explicitly recognized as a legal tender or official reserve asset in the United States, and its legal status remains controversial. -There are significant differences in attitudes towards cryptocurrencies within the US Congress, with many lawmakers criticizing their anonymity, potential illegal uses (such as money laundering and terrorist financing), and environmental issues (mining energy consumption). --- 3. * * Political resistance** -Many members of the US Congress are skeptical of cryptocurrencies, especially progressive Democrats and supporters of the traditional financial system. -Key institutions such as the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department are also cautious about cryptocurrencies, believing that they may pose a threat to financial stability. --- 4. Purpose of Strategic Reserve** -The US strategic reserves (such as oil strategic reserves and gold reserves) are mainly used to respond to emergencies or international crises, while Bitcoin currently does not have this function. -The value of Bitcoin depends on market confidence and technological infrastructure, rather than physical or national credit support, and therefore is not suitable as a strategic reserve. --- 5. Public and industry attitudes** -Although the cryptocurrency industry supports the legalization and adoption of Bitcoin, the acceptance of cryptocurrency by the general public and traditional financial institutions is still limited. -Including Bitcoin in strategic reserves may raise public questions about government decisions, especially when Bitcoin prices fluctuate dramatically. --- 6. * * International impact** -If the United States includes Bitcoin in its strategic reserves, it may trigger imitation or opposition from other countries, affecting the stability of the international financial system. -At present, major economies around the world, such as China and the European Union, hold a strict regulatory attitude towards cryptocurrencies, and unilateral actions by the United States may trigger international controversy. --- conclusion Considering the above factors, the likelihood of the US Congress approving the inclusion of Bitcoin in the strategic reserve is extremely low. Unless Bitcoin can address issues of volatility, regulation, and legitimacy in the future and gain broad political and social consensus, this proposal will be difficult to implement. Currently, Bitcoin is more likely to exist as a private investment asset or technological innovation rather than a part of national strategic reserves.