Difficult, it's too difficult for ordinary people Many project parties lack systematic planning when planning activities, and most of them make impulsive decisions without designing reasonable activities around the long-term development of the agreement. This short-sighted behavior has brought two main problems: 1. Raising community expectations, even a slight fluctuation in the market will ultimately prevent it from being fulfilled. We can only rely on the witch's oil head to screen data, turn a blind eye, and ultimately lead to the so-called collapse of community trust. Of course, many project parties are indifferent and do everything for the sake of the university. 2. Some activities are driven by the operations team, but the senior management of the project is not fully aware of their impact and consequences. The operations team creates a bunch of malicious activities for traffic, which will inevitably cause traffic backlash, Exchanges often put pressure on project parties to allocate a larger proportion of tokens in order to gain more market share. In order to obtain listing, liquidity support, and market exposure, the project team had to sacrifice the share of community users and directly compress the share of community retail investors. The project team also has its own small 99, but the unanimous voice to the outside world is that the strength of the exchange leaves the project team with no other choice This kind of game is inevitable, and community users have almost no chance of winning, often becoming the biggest victims in the end. The most direct impact is the shrinkage of airdrops, and retail investors who once followed hard are abandoned. At the same time, liquidity is squeezed, and exchanges receive large amounts of chips and distribute them to exchange users. Most tokens will be thrown into the market, and retail investors are forced to become buyers. Market decline is inevitable under selling. Oh no, the common people are so miserable