It cannot be said that just looking at macro data can guarantee wealth, after all, there are many ways to make money, especially the most profitable plans are written in the criminal law for everyone to consult for free. Macroeconomics may not necessarily be a tool for making money, but it is a highly fault-tolerant investment method. The simplest way is to buy at the bottom when liquidity is tight and sell when liquidity is loose. This may not necessarily lead to 100% wealth, but losses are definitely not significant. In addition, macroeconomics is not something that can be achieved just by words. Macroeconomics requires a lot of learning, even if it is not an understanding of the global economy and policies, it also requires an understanding of the economy and policies of specific countries. The threshold for macro level education is high and low. People like me, who have no education or foundation, can say a few words, but they are only superficial. However, since I started studying macro in 2022, I have at least made some small money in the overall direction. Although I cannot make a fortune, I can still live and work in this small place. I am not encouraging everyone to learn macroeconomics, after all, all roads lead to Rome, and as long as they can make money, it is good. After all, macroeconomics, data, technology, or metaphysics are all designed to serve the purpose of making money. No one is higher or lower than anyone else, and those who can make money are all good ways. PS： Especially in this cycle, it is not a problem to say that macro economics do not make money, unless it is all about playing Meme. Otherwise, whether it is cryptocurrency, US stocks, or large A-shares, whether it is US bonds, DeFi, or real estate, they are all closely related to macro economics. You can't see, it just means you can't see, but it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.