When I was talking about this point yesterday, it was actually because I had coffee with a project team brother who just came from Australia and talked about the issuance of valuable anchored assets on the asset chain. I was inspired by this @Calilytiu posted a few days ago, saying that making the real world valuable but with low-frequency trading attributes, even with various price discovery tools on the chain, will not increase its trading volume much. More often involved as collateral on the chain I believe in this logic. One of the main abilities of public chains like @ Lumenetworks, which specialize in RWA, is to move various Web2 mortgages onto the chain for liquidation. The CDO of the 2008 financial crisis had a rigid demand for buying and selling, which did not comply with regulations on Tradfi. However, when it was put on the chain, it was another matter But liquidation requires liquidity. A non cash and non-standard thing that cannot be liquidated in a closed loop like on chain lending (will liquidation involve the need for third-party arbitration), how much on chain liquidity can there be, from a fundamental logic perspective, is a mystery If in the end, we give him liquidity, it cannot be driven by the fundamental demand of Tradfi on the chain, but rather by the pure on chain native trading demand that deviates from its RWA fundamentals To put it simply, traditional assets on the chain are boring, but are they being used as memes and launched on the chain using an on chain launch mechanism? Tomorrow, find a time to discuss the objective feasibility and the inevitability of audience trends